Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STOJC v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Stojc v. Slovenia

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 20965/03

  RIBIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 20159/06

  For relevant domestic law see judgment Ribic v. Slovenia (no. 20965/03, 19 October 2010, § 19).

  The case is thus similar to the case Ribic v. Slovenia (no. 20965/03, 19 October 2010).

• EGMR, 06.04.2006 - 42274/02

  BIZJAK JAGODIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 20159/06

  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see, Bastic v. Slovenia, no. 75809/01, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006 and Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006) the Court considers that the length of the proceedings, which lasted more than five years and eight months at two levels of jurisdiction was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
• EGMR, 06.04.2006 - 75809/01

  BASTIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 20159/06

  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see, Bastic v. Slovenia, no. 75809/01, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006 and Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006) the Court considers that the length of the proceedings, which lasted more than five years and eight months at two levels of jurisdiction was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.

 
• EGMR, 27.04.2006 - 38528/02

  RODIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 20159/06

  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see, Bastic v. Slovenia, no. 75809/01, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006 and Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006) the Court considers that the length of the proceedings, which lasted more than five years and eight months at two levels of jurisdiction was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 18/03

  VANZHULA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 20159/06

  18/03/2013.
• EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 32600/05

  BARISIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 20159/06

  In my separate opinion in Barisic v. Slovenia (32600/05) I have set out the reasons why I cannot accept the Court's current "broad brush" approach to "length of proceedings" claims.
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 20159/06

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 for a case to be heard within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 20159/06

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 33347/07

  GROBIN v. SLOVENIA

  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Barisic v. Slovenia, no. 32600/05, §§ 45-47, 18 October 2012; Stojc v. Slovenia, no. 20159/06, §§ 22-25, 18 October 2012; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006 and Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006) the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable-time" requirement.