Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 23032/02, 28936/02, 27946/02, 22174/02, 26342/04, 26881/02, 32600/05, 75809/01, 75402/01, 24901/02, 25634/05, 7877/02, 10017/10, 77519/01, 39178/02, 1459/02, 34747/06, 42274/02, 50719/06, 77809/01, 23571/02, 34386/10, 5158/02, 21462/04, 72072/12, 42852/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 23032/02, 28936/02, 27946/02, 22174/02, 26342/04, 26881/02, 32600/05, 75809/01, 75402/01, 24901/02, 25634/05, 7877/02, 10017/10, 77519/01, 39178/02, 1459/02, 34747/06, 42274/02, 50719/06, 77809/01, 23571/02, 34386/10, 5158/02, 21462/04, 72072/12, 42852/02 (https://dejure.org/2016,45363)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.12.2016 - 23032/02, 28936/02, 27946/02, 22174/02, 26342/04, 26881/02, 32600/05, 75809/01, 75402/01, 24901/02, 25634/05, 7877/02, 10017/10, 77519/01, 39178/02, 1459/02, 34747/06, 42274/02, 50719/06, 77809/01, 23571/02, 34386/10, 5158/02, 21462/04, 72072/12, 42852/02 (https://dejure.org/2016,45363)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. Dezember 2016 - 23032/02, 28936/02, 27946/02, 22174/02, 26342/04, 26881/02, 32600/05, 75809/01, 75402/01, 24901/02, 25634/05, 7877/02, 10017/10, 77519/01, 39178/02, 1459/02, 34747/06, 42274/02, 50719/06, 77809/01, 23571/02, 34386/10, 5158/02, 21462/04, 72072/12, 42852/02 (https://dejure.org/2016,45363)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,45363) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LUKENDA ET 263 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA SLOVÉNIE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LUKENDA AND 263 OTHER CASES AGAINST SLOVENIA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.10.2005 - 23032/02
- EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 23032/02, 28936/02, 27946/02, 22174/02, 26342/04, 26881/02, 32600/05, 75809/01, 75402/01, 24901/02, 25634/05, 7877/02, 10017/10, 77519/01, 39178/02, 1459/02, 34747/06, 42274/02, 50719/06, 77809/01, 23571/02, 34386/10, 5158/02, 21462/04, 72072/12, 42852/02
Wird zitiert von ... (7)
- EGMR, 19.06.2006 - 35014/97
HUTTEN-CZAPSKA c. POLOGNE
Suffice it to say here that decisions such as Broniowski or Hutten-Czapska, or for that matter Lukenda (v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, ECHR 2005-X), are practical and pragmatic decisions - akin to class-action judgments - that avert an increase in the quantity of cases without subverting the intended quality of the binding effect of the judgments of this Court.In my opinion, they require the Committee of Ministers" intervention in any event, without adding in any way to the system's efficiency (see, mutatis mutandis, Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, ECHR 2005-X).
- EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 40150/09
GLYKANTZI c. GRÈCE
Par contre, la Cour note que la présente affaire est similaire, du point de vue des questions posées et des personnes concernées, à celles déjà examinées par la Cour dans des « affaires pilotes'antérieures (voir Scordino c. Italie (no 1) [GC], no 36813/97, CEDH 2006-V ; Bourdov (no 2), précité ; Lukenda c. Slovénie, no 23032/02, CEDH 2005-X). - EGMR, 12.03.2014 - 26828/06
KURIC ET AUTRES c. SLOVÉNIE
On 10 January 2013 the Constitutional Court handed down a decision concerning the State's liability under Article 26 of the Constitution in a case stemming from the systemic problem of the protracted length of proceedings (see Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, §§ 89-98, ECHR 2005-X).
- EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 50973/08
VASSILIOS ATHANASIOU ET AUTRES c. GRECE
Par contre, la Cour note que la présente affaire est similaire, du point de vue des questions posées et des personnes concernées, à celles déjà examinées par la Cour dans des «affaires pilotes» antérieures (voir Bourdov c. Russie (no 2), précité ; Scordino c. Italie (no 1) [GC], no 36813/97, CEDH 2006-V ; Lukenda c. Slovénie, no 23032/02, CEDH 2005-X). - EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 54447/10
MICHELIOUDAKIS c. GRÈCE
Par contre, la Cour note que la présente affaire est similaire, du point de vue des questions posées et des personnes concernées, à celles déjà examinées par la Cour dans d'autres « affaires pilotes'antérieures (voir Bourdov (no 2), précité ; Scordino c. Italie (no 1), précité ; Lukenda c. Slovénie, no 23032/02, CEDH 2005-X). - EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 35463/02
UMEK v. SLOVENIA
The Court notes that it has already found that the remedies available prior to the entry into force of the 2006 Act, including a claim for damages under Article 26 of the Slovenian Constitution (see paragraph 24 above), cannot be considered effective (Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, ECHR 2005-X). - EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 44581/98
GERDEN v. SLOVENIA
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 32600/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55614) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BARISIC v. SLOVENIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Barisic v. Slovenia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (5) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 32600/05
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).Thirdly, while the factors to which reference should be made when assessing the reasonableness of the length of proceedings are clear (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, ECHR 2000-VII) a far stricter analysis of each factor should be conducted before a violation is found.
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 32600/05
The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 06.05.1981 - 7759/77
Buchholz ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 32600/05
This approach can be found in cases, such as, Buchholz v. Germany, 6 May 1981, Series A no. 42; Malicka-Wasowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 41413/98, 5 April 2001; and Potas v. Poland (dec.), no. 42615/98, 1 October 2002.
- EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 33347/07
GROBIN v. SLOVENIA
Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Barisic v. Slovenia, no. 32600/05, §§ 45-47, 18 October 2012; Stojc v. Slovenia, no. 20159/06, §§ 22-25, 18 October 2012; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006 and Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006) the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable-time" requirement. - EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 42236/05
HARTMAN v. SLOVENIA
In my separate opinion in Barisic v. Slovenia (32600/05) I have set out the reasons why I cannot accept the Court's current "broad brush" approach to "length of proceedings" claims. - EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 20159/06
STOJC v. SLOVENIA
In my separate opinion in Barisic v. Slovenia (32600/05) I have set out the reasons why I cannot accept the Court's current "broad brush" approach to "length of proceedings" claims. - EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 44135/06
DANIJEL PECNIK v. SLOVENIA
In my separate opinion in Barisic v. Slovenia (32600/05) I have set out the reasons why I cannot accept the Court's current "broad brush" approach to "length of proceedings" claims. - EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 50719/06
BJELIC v. SLOVENIA
In my separate opinion in Barisic v. Slovenia (32600/05) I have set out the reasons why I cannot accept the Court's current "broad brush" approach to "length of proceedings" claims.