Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHAVADZE v. GEORGIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SHAVADZE v. GEORGIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 02.04.2020 - 8938/07

  KUKHALASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 72080/12

  It is in relation to this purpose of an effective investigation that any issues, including those of promptness and reasonable expediency, must be assessed (see, as a recent authority, Kukhalashvili and Others v. Georgia, nos. 8938/07 and 41891/07, § 131, 2 April 2020, with further references).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 72080/12

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see, among other authorities, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, §§ 97-100, ECHR 2000-VII, and Akta?? v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, §§ 289-91, ECHR 2003-V (extracts)).
• EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38587/97

  BAYRAM and YILDIRIM v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 72080/12

  Where time is of the essence for resolving an issue in a case, there is a burden on the applicant to ensure that his or her claims are raised before both the relevant domestic authorities and the Court with the necessary expedition to ensure that they may be properly and fairly resolved (see, among other authorities, Bayram and Yildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III).

 
• EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 3598/03

  MERYEM ÇELIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 72080/12

  The Court has previously emphasised that where an individual is taken into custody in good health and dies at the hands of the security forces, the obligation on the authorities to account for the treatment of that individual is particularly stringent (see Meryem Çelik and Others v. Turkey, no. 3598/03, § 61, 16 April 2013).
• EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 26144/95

  IKINCISOY v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 72080/12

  However, having regard to the applicant's failure to submit any documents in support of her claim, it cannot be established with certainty that she was exclusively financially dependent on her deceased husband (compare, for instance, Kukhalashvili and Others, cited above, § 162; Albekov and Others v. Russia, no. 68216/01, §§ 125-27, 9 October 2008; and Ikincisoy v. Turkey, no. 26144/95, § 137, 27 July 2004).
• EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 68216/01

  ALBEKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 72080/12

  However, having regard to the applicant's failure to submit any documents in support of her claim, it cannot be established with certainty that she was exclusively financially dependent on her deceased husband (compare, for instance, Kukhalashvili and Others, cited above, § 162; Albekov and Others v. Russia, no. 68216/01, §§ 125-27, 9 October 2008; and Ikincisoy v. Turkey, no. 26144/95, § 137, 27 July 2004).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 72080/12

  The Court reiterates that there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention, and that this may, in the appropriate case, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, among other authorities, Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 213, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).

• EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 45987/21

  ELIBASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  Having regard to the Court's relevant case-law and in view of the circumstances of the present case, the Court dismisses both inadmissibility pleas (see Machalikashvili and Others v. Georgia, no. 32245/19, §§ 68-69, 19 January 2023; see also Shavadze v. Georgia, no. 72080/12, §§ 26-27, 19 November 2020; Mikeladze and Others v. Georgia, no. 54217/16, § 51, 16 November 2021; and Gaidukevich v. Georgia, no. 38650/18, § 51, 15 June 2023).
• EGMR, 07.11.2023 - 63543/09

  DURDAJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  The requirement to allow for involvement of the victims can hardly be satisfied when victims of violations under Article 2 of the Convention or their next of kin have no possibility to participate in criminal proceedings against perpetrators of such violations (compare Ogur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 92, ECHR 1999-III; Boboc and Others v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 44592/16, § 53, 7 June 2022; Shavadze v. Georgia, no. 72080/12, § 35, 19 November 2020; Vazagashvili and Shanava, cited above, § 91; Iorga v. Moldova, no. 12219/05, §§ 35 and 36, 23 March 2010; and Pisari v. Moldova and Russia, no. 42139/12, § 59, 21 April 2015).