Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALBEKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 38, Art. 38 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violations of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 38-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 13.09.2007 - 68216/01
• EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 68216/01

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

  ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 68216/01

  They relied in this connection on the cases of Assanidze v. Georgia ([GC], no. 71503/01, §§ 202-203, ECHR 2004-II) and Tahsin Acar v. Turkey ((preliminary objection) [GC], no. 26307/95, § 84, ECHR 2003-VI).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 68216/01

  The Court reiterates that the obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", also requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see, mutatis mutandis, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 49, § 161, and Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 324, § 86).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 68216/01

  The passage of time will inevitably erode the amount and quality of the evidence available and the appearance of a lack of diligence will cast doubt on the good faith of the investigative efforts, as well as drag out the ordeal for the members of the family (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 86, ECHR 2002-II).

 
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 68216/01

  The Court observes that in previous cases it has already found this reference insufficient to justify refusal (see, among other authorities, Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 123, ECHR 2006-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 68216/01

  In a case where the application raises issues as to the effectiveness of the investigation, the documents of the criminal investigation are fundamental to the establishment of the facts and their absence may prejudice the Court's proper examination of the complaint both at the admissibility and at the merits stage (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57945/00

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 68216/01

  The Court further reiterates that the requirements of Article 13 are broader than a Contracting State's obligation under Article 2 to conduct an effective investigation (see Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia, nos. 57942/00 and 57945/00, § 183, 24 February 2005).

• EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 33056/17

  TKHELIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Furthermore, the applicant did not claim that she had herself been financially dependent on her daughter before her death (compare, for instance, Kukhalashvili and Others v. Georgia, nos. 8938/07 and 41891/07, § 162, 2 April 2020, and Albekov and Others v. Russia, no. 68216/01, §§ 125-27, 9 October 2008).
• EGMR, 02.04.2020 - 8938/07

  KUKHALASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Secondly, from the few documents submitted by the applicants, it cannot be established with certainty that they were exclusively financially dependent upon their deceased family members (compare, for instance, Gakiyev and Gakiyeva v. Russia, no. 3179/05, §§ 171-73, 23 April 2009; Albekov and Others v. Russia, no. 68216/01, §§ 125-127, 9 October 2008; and Ikincisoy v. Turkey, no. 26144/95, § 137, 27 July 2004).
• EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 36255/16

  TURAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  The principles concerning the relevant procedural and substantive aspects of Article 2 of the Convention have been summarized in Albekov and Others v. Russia, no. 68216/01, § 94, 9 October 2008, and Tsechoyev v. Russia, no. 39358/05, § 136, 15 March 2011, respectively.
• EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 72080/12

  SHAVADZE v. GEORGIA

  However, having regard to the applicant's failure to submit any documents in support of her claim, it cannot be established with certainty that she was exclusively financially dependent on her deceased husband (compare, for instance, Kukhalashvili and Others, cited above, § 162; Albekov and Others v. Russia, no. 68216/01, §§ 125-27, 9 October 2008; and Ikincisoy v. Turkey, no. 26144/95, § 137, 27 July 2004).