Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 20.06.1988 - 11368/85   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1988,10162
EGMR, 20.06.1988 - 11368/85 (https://dejure.org/1988,10162)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20.06.1988 - 11368/85 (https://dejure.org/1988,10162)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. Juni 1988 - 11368/85 (https://dejure.org/1988,10162)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1988,10162) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SCHÖNENBERGER ET DURMAZ c. SUISSE

    Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation de l'Art. 8 Aucune question distincte au regard de l'art. 10 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SCHÖNENBERGER AND DURMAZ v. SWITZERLAND

    Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 10 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings ...

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

    GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.06.1988 - 11368/85
    In accordance with the Court's case-law, the pursuit of this objective may "justify wider measures of interference in the case of a... [convicted] prisoner than in that of a person at liberty" (see the Golder judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 21, § 45).

    These various contacts amounted to preliminary steps intended to enable the second applicant to have the benefit of the assistance of a defence lawyer of his choice and, thereby, to exercise a right enshrined in another fundamental provision of the Convention, namely Article 6 (art. 6) (see, mutatis mutandis, the aforementioned Golder judgment, Series A no. 18, p. 22, § 45).

  • EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83

    BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.06.1988 - 11368/85
    On the basis of the incomplete information in its possession, the observations of those appearing before it and its own case-law in this area (see, as the most recent precedent, the Belilos judgment of 29 April 1988, Series A no. 132, pp. 27-28, § 79), the Court, making an equitable determination, awards to the first applicant 3, 820 CHF in respect of the costs of proceedings in Switzerland and then in Strasbourg until the submission of his memorial in October 1987 and 2, 500 CHF for the hearing of 22 February 1988 and to the second applicant 2, 500 CHF for Mr. Garbade's services before the Court and 250 CHF for the second applicant's travelling and subsistence expenses.
  • EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72

    SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.06.1988 - 11368/85
    The Court agrees with this opinion which is in line with its own case-law (see the Silver and Others judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 41, § 107).
  • EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83

    OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.06.1988 - 11368/85
    The Court points out that, to be necessary in a democratic society, an interference must be founded on a pressing social need and, in particular, be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see, as the most recent precedent, the Olsson judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, p. 31, § 67).
  • EGMR, 24.10.1983 - 5947/72

    SILVER ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI (ARTICLE 50)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.06.1988 - 11368/85
    The contested stopping of the letter may have obstructed the applicants and aroused in them a certain feeling of frustration, but not to the extent of requiring an award of damages; the finding of a violation of Article 8 (art. 8) in itself constitutes adequate just satisfaction in this respect (see, mutatis mutandis the Silver and Others judgment of 24 October 1983, Series A no. 67, p. 6, § 10).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht