Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STEPHENS v. MALTA (No. 1)

  Art. 1, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-1 No violation of Art. 5-4 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07
• EGMR, 10.07.2013 - 11956/07

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (15)

• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 48787/99

  Transnistrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07

  The exercise of jurisdiction is a necessary condition for a Contracting State to be able to be held responsible for acts or omissions imputable to it which give rise to an allegation of the infringement of rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention (see Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia, [GC], no. 48787/99, § 311, ECHR 2004 -...).

  The Court refers to its case-law on the notion of "jurisdiction" and how that notion has been interpreted and applied in different contexts (see Ilascu and Others [GC], no. 48787/99, cited above; Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, ECHR 2001-XII; Assanidzé v. Georgia, [GC], no. 71503/01, ECHR 2004 -...; Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161; Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201; Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215; Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310; Loizidou v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; Issa and Others v. Turkey, no. 31821/96, 16 November 2004; Behrami and Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (dec.) [GC], nos.

• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07

  The Court refers to its case-law on the notion of "jurisdiction" and how that notion has been interpreted and applied in different contexts (see Ilascu and Others [GC], no. 48787/99, cited above; Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, ECHR 2001-XII; Assanidzé v. Georgia, [GC], no. 71503/01, ECHR 2004 -...; Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161; Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201; Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215; Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310; Loizidou v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; Issa and Others v. Turkey, no. 31821/96, 16 November 2004; Behrami and Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (dec.) [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 12.12.2001 - 52207/99

  V. und B. B., Ž. S., M. S., D. J. und D. S. gegen Belgien, Dänemark, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07

  The Court refers to its case-law on the notion of "jurisdiction" and how that notion has been interpreted and applied in different contexts (see Ilascu and Others [GC], no. 48787/99, cited above; Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, ECHR 2001-XII; Assanidzé v. Georgia, [GC], no. 71503/01, ECHR 2004 -...; Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161; Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201; Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215; Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310; Loizidou v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; Issa and Others v. Turkey, no. 31821/96, 16 November 2004; Behrami and Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (dec.) [GC], nos.

 
• EGMR, 23.03.1995 - 15318/89

  LOIZIDOU c. TURQUIE (EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07

  The Court refers to its case-law on the notion of "jurisdiction" and how that notion has been interpreted and applied in different contexts (see Ilascu and Others [GC], no. 48787/99, cited above; Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, ECHR 2001-XII; Assanidzé v. Georgia, [GC], no. 71503/01, ECHR 2004 -...; Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161; Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201; Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215; Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310; Loizidou v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; Issa and Others v. Turkey, no. 31821/96, 16 November 2004; Behrami and Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (dec.) [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 71412/01

  A. B. und B. B. gegen Frankreich und der Individualbeschwerde Nr. 78166/01 von R. …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07

  71412/01 and 78166/01, 2 May 2007; Drodz and Janousek v. France and Spain, 26 June 1992, Series A no. 240, and Hess v. the United Kingdom, no. 6231/73, 28 May 1975, Decisions and Reports (DR) no. 2, p. 72).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07

  The Court reiterates that a decision or measure favourable to the applicant is not in principle sufficient to deprive him of his status as a "victim" unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, for example, Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 32, §§ 69 et seq; and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI).
• EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

  DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07

  Nevertheless, a State which institutes such a system must in principle accord to the detainees the same guarantees on appeal as at first instance (see, inter alia, mutatis mutandis, Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, p. 14, § 25 in fine, and Ekbatani v. Sweden, judgment of 26 May 1988, Series A no. 134, p. 12, § 24).
• EGMR, 20.03.1991 - 15576/89

  CRUZ VARAS ET AUTRES c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07

  The Court refers to its case-law on the notion of "jurisdiction" and how that notion has been interpreted and applied in different contexts (see Ilascu and Others [GC], no. 48787/99, cited above; Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, ECHR 2001-XII; Assanidzé v. Georgia, [GC], no. 71503/01, ECHR 2004 -...; Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161; Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201; Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215; Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310; Loizidou v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; Issa and Others v. Turkey, no. 31821/96, 16 November 2004; Behrami and Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (dec.) [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87

  VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07

  The Court refers to its case-law on the notion of "jurisdiction" and how that notion has been interpreted and applied in different contexts (see Ilascu and Others [GC], no. 48787/99, cited above; Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, ECHR 2001-XII; Assanidzé v. Georgia, [GC], no. 71503/01, ECHR 2004 -...; Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161; Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201; Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215; Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310; Loizidou v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; Issa and Others v. Turkey, no. 31821/96, 16 November 2004; Behrami and Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (dec.) [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 12.05.1992 - 13770/88

  MEGYERI c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07

  Although it is not always necessary that the procedure under Article 5 § 4 be attended by the same guarantees as those required under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for criminal or civil litigation (see the Megyeri v. Germany judgment of 12 May 1992, Series A no. 237-A, p. 11, § 22, and Reinprecht v. Austria, no. 67175/01, § 31, ECHR 2005-II), it must have a judicial character and provide guarantees appropriate to the kind of deprivation of liberty in question.
• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94

  Anforderungen an die unverzügliche Vorführung der festgenommenen Person i.S.d. …
• EGMR, 21.10.1986 - 9862/82

  SANCHEZ-REISSE c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 17977/91

  KAMPANIS v. GREECE
• EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 67175/01

  REINPRECHT c. AUTRICHE
• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25644/94

  T.W. v. MALTA

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 06.07.2015 - C-237/15

  Lanigan

  81 - Vgl. EGMR, Bogan u. a./Vereinigtes Königreich, 29. November 1988, Serie A Nr. 145-B, § 65, sowie Stephens/Malta, 21. April 2009, Nr. 11956/07, § 95.

  86 - EGMR, Meygeri/Deutschland, 12. Mai 1992, Serie A Nr. 237-A, § 65, und Stephens/Malta, 21. April 2009, Nr. 11956/07, § 95.