Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 14927/12, 30415/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,11538) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FEHÉR AND DOLNÍK v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 12 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 53124/09
GENOVESE v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 14927/12
Since the Convention guarantees no right to nationality, the question whether a person was denied a State's nationality arbitrarily in a way susceptible of raising an issue under the Convention is to be determined with reference to the terms of the domestic law (for a recapitulation of the relevant case-law see Kuric and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, § 353, ECHR 2012; Genovese v. Malta, no. 53124/09, § 30, 11 October 2011; Fedorova v. Latvia (dec.), no. 69405/01, 9 October 2003; Karassev v. Finland (dec.), no. 31414/96, ECHR 1999-II; Fedorova v. Latvia (dec.), no. 69405/01, 9 October 2003; and, mutatis mutandis, Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321/99, § 77, ECHR 2002-II; all with further references). - EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00
Andrejeva ./. Lettland
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 14927/12
The Court has held that benefits under a State's social security system may, under certain circumstances, attract the guarantees of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, and that unjustified denial of such benefits on the ground of a person's nationality is contrary to Article 14 in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, §§ 77-92, ECHR 2009). - EGMR, 12.01.1999 - 31414/96
KARASSEV v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 14927/12
Since the Convention guarantees no right to nationality, the question whether a person was denied a State's nationality arbitrarily in a way susceptible of raising an issue under the Convention is to be determined with reference to the terms of the domestic law (for a recapitulation of the relevant case-law see Kuric and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, § 353, ECHR 2012; Genovese v. Malta, no. 53124/09, § 30, 11 October 2011; Fedorova v. Latvia (dec.), no. 69405/01, 9 October 2003; Karassev v. Finland (dec.), no. 31414/96, ECHR 1999-II; Fedorova v. Latvia (dec.), no. 69405/01, 9 October 2003; and, mutatis mutandis, Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321/99, § 77, ECHR 2002-II; all with further references).