Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KUPARADZE v. GEORGIA

  No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial);No violation of Article ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KUPARADZE v. GEORGIA

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 30743/09

  The assessment of this minimum is a relative one and depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, inter alia, Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 86, ECHR 2015, with further references, and Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-IX).
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

  ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 30743/09

  The concept of a "continuing situation" refers to a state of affairs in which there are continuous activities by or on the part of the State which render the applicant a victim (see Posti and Rahko v. Finland, no 27824/95, § 39, ECHR 2002-VII, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 75-78, 10 January 2012, with further references).
• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

  BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 30743/09

  Accordingly, the Court does not consider that the appellate court's reasoning to dismiss the two alternative forensic reports was of such an inconclusive nature as to disturb the overall fairness of the proceedings (compare again with Moreira Ferreira, cited above, § 84, and see also Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 62, ECHR 2015 with further references).

 
• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24724/94

  Mord an James Bulger

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 30743/09

  Furthermore, the Convention does not prohibit the States from subjecting convicted juveniles to imprisonment (see, mutatis mutandis, T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724/94, § 97, 16 December 1999).
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 30743/09

  In determining whether, in the light of the above principles, the cumulative effects of the conditions of the applicant's detention (see Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II) in the present case amounted to treatment in breach of Article 3, the Court observes the following.
• EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97

  WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 30743/09

  It marks out the temporal limits of supervision carried out by the Court and signals to both individuals and State authorities the period beyond which such supervision is no longer possible (see Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I).
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 70337/01

  GÜVEÇ c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 30743/09

  In this connection, contrary to the applicant's complaint, her placement in the section for juvenile offenders does not, in and of itself, raise an issue under Article 3 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, D.G. v. Ireland, no. 39474/98, § 97, ECHR 2002-III, and contrast with Güveç v. Turkey, no. 70337/01, § 98, ECHR 2009 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 24.09.2002 - 27824/95

  POSTI AND RAHKO v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 30743/09

  The concept of a "continuing situation" refers to a state of affairs in which there are continuous activities by or on the part of the State which render the applicant a victim (see Posti and Rahko v. Finland, no 27824/95, § 39, ECHR 2002-VII, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 75-78, 10 January 2012, with further references).
• EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 41721/04

  DERYAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 30743/09

  Without requiring a detailed answer to every argument advanced by the complainant, this obligation presupposes that parties to judicial proceedings can expect to receive a specific and explicit reply to the arguments which are decisive for the outcome of those proceedings (see Moreira Ferreira, cited above, § 84; see also Tchankotadze v. Georgia, no. 15256/05, § 103, 21 June 2016, and Deryan v. Turkey, no. 41721/04, § 33, 21 July 2015).

• EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 36475/10

  AGIT DEMIR c. TURQUIE

  Les droits interne et international concernant les mineurs sont décrits dans les arrêts Güveç c. Turquie (no 70337/01, §§ 49-64, CEDH 2009 (extraits)) et Süzer c. Turquie (no 13885/05, §§ 52-57, 23 avril 2013 ; s'agissant des conditions de détention des mineurs, voir Kuparadze c. Géorgie, no 30743/09, §§ 42-44, 21 septembre 2017).

  En ce qui concerne les enfants, la Cour souligne que, conformément au droit international en vigueur (en ce qui concerne les règles internationales pertinentes voir, Kuparadze c. Géorgie, no 30743/09, § 42-44), les règles de détention des mineurs exigent une séparation entre les mineurs et les adultes lors de la détention, qu'elle soit préventive ou après condamnation, ainsi que l'obligation de traiter ces mineurs avec une attention particulière en raison de leur situation, de leur âge et de leurs besoins.

• EGMR, 29.06.2021 - 45801/12

  UCA c. TURQUIE

  Les droits interne et international pertinents concernant les mineurs sont décrits dans les arrêts Güveç c. Turquie (no 70337/01, §§ 49-64, CEDH 2009 (extraits)) et Süzer c. Turquie (no 13885/05, §§ 52-57, 23 avril 2013 ; s'agissant des conditions de détention des mineurs, voir Kuparadze c. Géorgie, no 30743/09, §§ 42-44, 21 septembre 2017).