Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 9103/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,49254) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GEORGIAN LABOUR PARTY v. GEORGIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Art. 14, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Partly admissible partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 9103/04
- EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 9103/04
- EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 9103/04
- EGMR, 07.08.2008 - 9103/04
- EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 9103/04
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 9103/04
At the outset, the Court emphasises that it is not its role to examine disputes over internal politics (mutatis mutandis, Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 149, ECHR 2004-II) and that the parties should use the machinery of the Convention only for the purposes for which it has been established. - EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 5667/02
KÉRÉTCHACHVILI c. GEORGIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 9103/04
The Court further recalls that, in principle, an application, even if it uses offensive language, may only be rejected as abusive under Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see Keretchashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, 2 May 2006; Varbanov v. Bulgaria, judgment 5 October 2000, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, §§ 53-54). - EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 61164/00
DURINGER et AUTRES et GRUNGE contre la FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 9103/04
61164/00 and 18589/02). - EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 46468/99
MANOUSSOS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 9103/04
However, the persistent use of insulting or provocative language by an applicant may be considered an abuse of the right of individual petition (see Manoussos v. the Czech Republic and Germany (dec.), no. 46468/99, 9 July 2002; Duringer and Others v. France (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 02.09.2004 - 11676/04
BOSKOSKI c. " L'EX-REPUBLIQUE YOUGOSLAVE DE MACEDOINE "
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 9103/04
Should it be established that the office of the Head of the State had been given the power to initiate and adopt legislation or enjoyed wide powers to control the passage of legislation or the power to censure the principal legislation-setting authorities, then it could arguably be considered to be a "legislature" within the meaning of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 (see Boskoski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 11676/04, ECHR 2004-...).