Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 50213/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,42460) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TAM v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 5-1 Violation of Art. 5-4 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 50213/99
- EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 50213/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 50213/99
The Convention here refers essentially to national law and lays down the obligation to conform to the substantive and procedural rules of national law (see, amongst many authorities, Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, pp. 17-18, 19-20, §§ 39 and 45; Bizzotto v. Greece, judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1738, § 31, and Aerts v. Belgium, judgment of 30 July 1998, Reports 1998-V, p. 1961, § 46). - EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 50213/99
In order to determine whether a proceeding provides adequate guarantees, regard must be had to the particular nature of the circumstances in which such proceeding takes place (see, among other authorities, Winterwerp, cited above, § 57; Trzaska v. Poland, no. 25792/94, § 74; Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 100, ECHR 2000-IX and D.N. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27154/95, § 41, ECHR 2001-III). - EGMR, 29.03.2001 - 27154/95
D.N. c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 50213/99
In order to determine whether a proceeding provides adequate guarantees, regard must be had to the particular nature of the circumstances in which such proceeding takes place (see, among other authorities, Winterwerp, cited above, § 57; Trzaska v. Poland, no. 25792/94, § 74; Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 100, ECHR 2000-IX and D.N. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27154/95, § 41, ECHR 2001-III).