Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31950/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,63796) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GÖKHAN YILDIRIM v. TURKEY
Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 30.09.2008 - 31950/05
- EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31950/05
- EGMR - 31950/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31950/05
Failing which, a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V, and Ribitsch v. Austria, § 34, 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31950/05
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 3 of the Convention (see, in particular, ErdoÄ?an YaÄ?ız v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2007-... (extracts); Hacı Özen v. Turkey, no. 46286/99, §§ 44-45, 12 April 2007; Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX; and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31950/05
Failing which, a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V, and Ribitsch v. Austria, § 34, 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336).
- EGMR, 14.11.2002 - 67263/01
MOUISEL v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31950/05
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 3 of the Convention (see, in particular, ErdoÄ?an YaÄ?ız v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2007-... (extracts); Hacı Özen v. Turkey, no. 46286/99, §§ 44-45, 12 April 2007; Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX; and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31950/05
Where domestic proceedings have taken place, it is not the Court's task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and as a general rule it is for those courts to assess the evidence before them (see Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 29, Series A no. 269). - EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94
AVSAR c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31950/05
In assessing evidence, the Court has generally applied the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt" (see Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 282, ECHR 2001). - EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02
ERDOGAN YAGIZ v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31950/05
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 3 of the Convention (see, in particular, ErdoÄ?an YaÄ?ız v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2007-... (extracts); Hacı Özen v. Turkey, no. 46286/99, §§ 44-45, 12 April 2007; Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX; and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 46286/99
HACI ÖZEN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31950/05
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 3 of the Convention (see, in particular, ErdoÄ?an YaÄ?ız v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2007-... (extracts); Hacı Özen v. Turkey, no. 46286/99, §§ 44-45, 12 April 2007; Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX; and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).