Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PANAYI v. CYPRUS

  Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09

  This subsidiary character is reflected in Articles 13 and 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09

  The purpose of Article 35 § 1, which sets out the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies, is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09

  Finally, as is evident from section 11 of Law 2(I)/2010, in assessing the reasonableness of the length of proceedings, the domestic courts are required to look at a number of the criteria established by the Court's case-law, such as the complexity of the case, the applicant's conduct and that of the competent authorities, (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Frydlender v.France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

 
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09

  Finally, as is evident from section 11 of Law 2(I)/2010, in assessing the reasonableness of the length of proceedings, the domestic courts are required to look at a number of the criteria established by the Court's case-law, such as the complexity of the case, the applicant's conduct and that of the competent authorities, (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Frydlender v.France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09

  The existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, inter alia, Vernillo v. France, 20 February 1991, § 27, Series A no. 198; Dalia v. France, 19 February 1998, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, and Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, ECHR 2002-VIII).In addition, according to the "generally recognised principles of international law", there may be special circumstances which absolve the applicant from the obligation to exhaust the domestic remedies at his disposal (see Selmouni, cited above, § 75).
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76

  VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09

  However, the Court points out that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 71, 1996-IV; Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, § 37; and Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01

  BRUSCO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09

  However, the Court points out that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 71, 1996-IV; Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, § 37; and Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01

  NOGOLICA c. CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09

  A similar decision was taken in respect of cases brought against Slovenia, Croatia, Slovakia and Poland following legislative changes (see Korenjak v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 463/03, 15 May 2007; Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005; Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII; and Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00

  ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09

  57984/00, 60226/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00 and 68563/01, ECHR 2002-IX).
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03

  MICHALAK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 46370/09

  A similar decision was taken in respect of cases brought against Slovenia, Croatia, Slovakia and Poland following legislative changes (see Korenjak v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 463/03, 15 May 2007; Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005; Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII; and Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 463/03

  KORENJAK v. SLOVENIA

• EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  ALTIUS INSURANCE LTD v. CYPRUS

  Law on Effective Remedies for Violations of the Right to a Determination of Civil Rights and Obligations within a Reasonable Time (Law 2(I)/2010) 40. The relevant provisions of Law 2(I)/2010 are set out in detail in Panayi v. Cyprus ((dec.), no. 46370/09, 23 September 2010).
• EGMR, 07.07.2020 - 41553/18

  GURAVSKA v. LATVIA

  The Court observes that some States have also adopted remedies that combine the acceleratory and compensatory elements (see Novak v. Croatia (dec.), no. 7877/14, §§ 49-61, 14 June 2016, and Panayi v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 46370/09, 23 September 2010).