Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SANDEL v. \

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82

  KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 21790/03

  This right applies not only to oral statements made at the trial hearing but also to documentary material and the pre-trial proceedings (see Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, § 74, Series A no. 168).
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00

  ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 21790/03

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 64, ECHR 2004-IV).
• EGMR, 28.11.1978 - 6210/73

  Luedicke, Belkacem und Koç ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 21790/03

  The Court recalls that Article 6 § 3 (e) indicates that a person "charged with a criminal offence" who cannot understand or speak the language used in court has the right to the free assistance of an interpreter for the translation or interpretation of all those documents or statements in the proceedings instituted against him which are necessary for him to understand, or to have rendered into the court's language in order to have the benefit of a fair trial (see Luedicke, Belkacem and Koç, 28 November 1978, § 48, Series A no. 29, p. 20).

 
• LG Bonn, 25.09.2008 - 27 Qs 5/08

  Rechtmäßigkeit einer Durchsuchung von Geschäftsräumen aufgrund des Verdachts …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 21790/03

  27/08/2010.
• EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 19611/04

  SUBINSKI v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 21790/03

  Consequently, this was the date on which he was "charged" for the purposes of Article 6 of the Convention and which is to be taken as the starting point for calculating the relevant period (see Subinski v. Slovenia, no. 19611/04, § 62, 18 January 2007 and the references cited therein).
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 26541/02

  NANKOV v.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 21790/03

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see Nankov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26541/02, § 45, 29 November 2007).
• EKMR, 02.03.1983 - 9742/82

  X. v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 21790/03

  In this connection they referred to the case of X. v. Ireland (see X. v. Ireland (dec.) no. 9742/82, 2 March 1983).