Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 44261/19 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,48193) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
PAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 10347/10
MIKA c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 44261/19
The requirement to prove the truth of a value judgment is impossible to fulfil and infringes freedom of opinion itself, which is a fundamental part of the right secured by Article 10 (see Mika v. Greece, no. 10347/10, § 31, 19 December 2013). - EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 29483/09
SEMIR GÜZEL v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 44261/19
Criminal charges and prosecutions could therefore amount to a violation of Article 10 even if the prosecution was abandoned or discontinued (see Murat Vural v. Turkey, no. 9540/07, § 52, 21 October 2014, and Semir Güzel v. Turkey, no. 29483/09, § 27, 13 September 2016). - EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08
Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 44261/19
The general principles concerning the necessity of an interference with freedom of expression can be found in Pentikäinen v. Finland ([GC], no. 11882/10, §§ 87-91, ECHR 2015); and the general principles applicable to cases in which the right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention has to be balanced against the right to respect for private life under Article 8 of the Convention were set out by the Grand Chamber in Axel Springer AG v. Germany ([GC], no. 39954/08, §§ 78-95, ECHR 2012) and Von Hannover v. Germany (No. 2) ([GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 95-113, ECHR 2012). - EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 9540/07
MURAT VURAL v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 44261/19
Criminal charges and prosecutions could therefore amount to a violation of Article 10 even if the prosecution was abandoned or discontinued (see Murat Vural v. Turkey, no. 9540/07, § 52, 21 October 2014, and Semir Güzel v. Turkey, no. 29483/09, § 27, 13 September 2016).
- EGMR, 02.11.2023 - 14228/18
PANIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, concerning permanent video surveillance of detainees and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; and Pal v. the United Kingdom, no. 44261/19, §§ 39-63, 30 November 2021, related to criminal arrest and prosecution in breach of Article 10 of the Convention). - EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 20755/08
AZADLIQ AND ZAYIDOV v. AZERBAIJAN
It therefore rejects their claim in respect of pecuniary damage (compare, for example, Marinova and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 33502/07 and 3 others, § 120-21, 12 July 2016; Pal v. the United Kingdom, no. 44261/19, § 69, 30 November 2021; and Freitas Rangel, cited above, § 67).