Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MUTA v. UKRAINE

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 37246/06
• EGMR, 03.12.2020 - 37246/06

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 37246/06

  The Court further reiterates that its case-law is consistent and clear on the point that Article 3 of the Convention requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into alleged ill-treatment even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see Ay v. Turkey, no. 30951/96, § 60, 22 March 2005, and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII and, most recently, Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, 10 January 2012).
• EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99

  OKKALI c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 37246/06

  This is essential for maintaining the public's confidence in, and support for, the rule of law and for preventing any appearance of the authorities" tolerance of or collusion in unlawful acts (see, mutatis mutandis, Okkalı v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 65, ECHR 2006 XII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00

  MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 37246/06

  The minimum standards of effectiveness laid down by the Court's case-law include the requirements that the investigation must be independent, impartial and subject to public scrutiny, and that the competent authorities must act with exemplary diligence and promptness (see, mutatis mutandis, Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III).
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 32662/06

  BISER KOSTOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 37246/06

  The Court further reiterates that its case-law is consistent and clear on the point that Article 3 of the Convention requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into alleged ill-treatment even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see Ay v. Turkey, no. 30951/96, § 60, 22 March 2005, and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII and, most recently, Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, 10 January 2012).

• EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 27454/11

  ORLIK v. UKRAINE

  The Court, which is master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case, finds that the above complaints fall to be examined under the procedural limb of Article 3 of the Convention (see Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246/06, § 51, 31 July 2012, and Ibrahim Demirtas v. Turkey, no. 25018/10, §§ 19 and 20, 28 October 2014).
• EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 35523/06

  ISAYEVA v. UKRAINE

  Furthermore, Article 3 of the Convention requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into alleged ill-treatment, even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246/06, § 59, 31 July 2012, and O'Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, § 172, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 1661/08

  CHERNAYA v. UKRAINE

  The minimum standards of effectiveness laid down by the Court's case-law include the requirements that the investigation be independent, impartial and subject to public scrutiny, and that the competent authorities must act with exemplary diligence and promptness (see, for example, Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246/06, § 61, 31 July 2012).
• EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 10025/06

  PELESHOK v. UKRAINE

  The Court reiterates that, according to its well-established case-law, Article 3 of the Convention gives rise to a procedural obligation to conduct an effective official investigation into alleged ill-treatment, even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII; Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, § 78, 10 January 2012; and Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246/06, § 59, 31 July 2012).