Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALIYEVA AND ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Aliyeva and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ALIYEVA AND ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 35587/08

  The obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", also requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force, either by State officials or private individuals (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 103, ECHR 1999-IV; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Branko Tomasic and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598/06, § 62, 15 January 2009).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

  MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 35587/08

  The obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", also requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force, either by State officials or private individuals (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 103, ECHR 1999-IV; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Branko Tomasic and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598/06, § 62, 15 January 2009).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 35587/08

  The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws which protect the right to life (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II).

 
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 35587/08

  The investigation must be effective in the sense that it is capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see OÄŸur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 88, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 35587/08

  Whatever mode is employed, the authorities must act of their own motion once the matter has come to their attention (see, for example, mutatis mutandis, Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, ECHR 2000-VII, § 63).
• EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 35587/08

  The Court further notes that it also recently had an opportunity to clarify the above-mentioned criteria, and found that for a "genuine connection" to be established, both criteria must be satisfied: the period of time between the death as the triggering event and the entry into force of the Convention must have been reasonably short, and a major part of the investigation must have been carried out, or ought to have been carried out, after the entry into force (see Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, § 148, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 35403/06

  TSINTSABADZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 35587/08

  In all cases, the next of kin of the victim must be involved in the procedure to such an extent as is necessary to safeguard his or her legitimate interests (see Tsintsabadze v. Georgia, no. 35403/06, § 76, 15 February 2011).

• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 36925/07

  GÜZELYURTLU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND TURKEY

  In the absence of "special features" in a given case (within the meaning of Rantsev, cited above, § 243; for instance, treaty commitments to investigate or to institute criminal proceedings in respect of a death occurring in another State Party as in the case of Aliyeva and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 35587/08, § 57, 31 July 2014), a State was obliged to investigate a death under Article 2 only if there was such a "jurisdictional link" between the victim and the State.
• EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 1049/17

  NIKA v. ALBANIA

  The applicants' letter of 2021 (see paragraph 78 above), in which they acknowledged having been kept informed of investigative developments that had occurred prior to 2020, does not suffice to justify the conclusion that they were involved in the procedure to the extent necessary to safeguard their legitimate interests (see Tsintsabadze v. Georgia, no. 35403/06, § 76, 15 February 2011, and Aliyeva and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 35587/08, § 70, 31 July 2014).
• EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 73974/14

  TSALIKIDIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  In all cases, the victim's next of kin must be involved in the procedure to the extent necessary to safeguard his or her legitimate interests (see Aliyeva and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 35587/08, § 70, 31 July 2014).