Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÖSTERREICHISCHE SCHUTZGEMEINSCHAFT FÜR NICHTRAUCHER AND ROCKENBAUER v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 25.03.1985 - 8734/79

  Barthold ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.12.1991 - 17200/91

  The Contracting States have a margin of appreciation in assessing whether such a need exists, but this goes hand in hand with a European supervision which is more or less extensive depending on the circumstances (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 24-25, para. 55; Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, pp. 19-20, para. 33).
• EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9063/80

  GILLOW v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.12.1991 - 17200/91

  Furthermore, the mere fact that four of the Supreme Court judges deciding upon the merits of the action, had already been involved in the interim injunction proceedings, is not in itself sufficient to give rise to legitimate doubts as to their impartiality (cf. mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court H.R., Gillow judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 109, p. 28, para. 73).
• EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83

  MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH ET KLAUS BEERMANN c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.12.1991 - 17200/91

  The Contracting States have a margin of appreciation in assessing whether such a need exists, but this goes hand in hand with a European supervision which is more or less extensive depending on the circumstances (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 24-25, para. 55; Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, pp. 19-20, para. 33).
• EKMR, 11.05.1981 - 7990/77

  X. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 02.12.1991 - 17200/91

  The interim injunction proceedings therefore fall outside the scope of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention (cf., mutatis mutandis, No. 7990/77, Dec. 11.5.81, D.R. 24 pp. 57, 61).

• EGMR, 22.02.2007 - 5266/03

  NIKOWITZ AND VERLAGSGRUPPE NEWS GMBH v. AUSTRIA

  The Government also referred in this regard to the judgment in Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal (no. 37698/97, ECHR 2000-X) and the decision in Österreichische Schutzgemeinschaft für Nichtraucher and Rockenbauer v. Austria (no. 17200/91, Commission decision of 2 December 1991, unreported).