Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 35274/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,26792) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89
ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 35274/97
Having regard to the case-law under which the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the particular circumstances of the case, in particular the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities (see, for example, Eur. Court HR, Terranova v. Italy judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 337-B, p. 21, para. 20) and the importance of what is at stake for the applicant in the litigation (see, among other authorities, Eur. Court HR, Allenet de Ribemont v. France judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, p. 19, para. 47), the Commission finds that the period of two years and two months did not exceed, in this case, the "reasonable time" required under Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention. - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92
HOKKANEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.03.1998 - 35274/97
The European Court of Human Rights had previously found that insufficient activity on the part of the social welfare authorities in giving effect to the court decisions and enforcement orders to arrange access of a father to a child may gave rise to a violation of a father's right to respect for his family life (Eur. Court HR, Hokkanen v. Finland judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, p. 23, paras. 60-62,).