Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NELSON v. UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 14+5, Art. 14, Art. 5, Art. 7 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NELSON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 14+5, Art. 14, Art. 5, Art. 7 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1986 - 11077/84

  H.R., Marckx judgment of 13.6.1979, Series A no. 32).
• EGMR, 24.06.1982 - 7906/77

  VAN DROOGENBROECK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.10.1986 - 11077/84

  24.6.82, Series A no. 50) i.e. "monitoring the development of the.

• EKMR, 14.10.1996 - 24919/94

  GERGER v. TURKEY

  However, the Commission also recalls, where a settled sentencing policy appears to affect individuals in a discriminatory fashion, this may arise issues under Article 5 in conjuction with Article 14 (Art. 5+14) of the Convention (No. 11077/84, Dec. 13.10.86, D.R. 49 pp. 170, 174).
• EGMR, 27.03.2018 - 14431/06

  ALEKSANDR ALEKSANDROV v. RUSSIA

  However, where a sentencing policy or decision affects individuals in a discriminatory manner - for example, where the custodial sentence determined pursuant to domestic legal provisions differentiates between offenders on account of their age or gender - the Court has accepted that an arguable claim of a violation of Article 14 of the Convention, taken together with Article 5 § 1 (a), may arise (see Khamtokhu and Aksenchik, cited above, §§ 55-59; Gerger v. Turkey [GC], no. 24919/94, § 69, 8 July 1999; and Nelson v. the United Kingdom, no. 11077/84, Commission decision of 13 October 1986).
• EGMR, 14.02.2003 - 2485/02

  IZQUIERDO MEDINA contre l'ESPAGNE

  Par ailleurs, d'une manière générale, la durée des peines infligées par les tribunaux ne relève pas de la Convention (N. c. Royaume-Uni, no 11077/84, décision de la Commission du 13 octobre 1986, Décisions et rapports (DR) 49, p. 170).

 
• EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 23572/94

  ESPOSITO v. ITALY

  Neither the applicant's civil rights and obligations, nor any criminal charges against him were thus at stake, but only the means of execution of a sentence already inflicted; Article 6 is therefore not applicable in the present case (cf. No. 7034/75, Dec. 12.10.77, D.R. 10, p. 146; No. 11077/84, Dec. 13.10.86, D.R. 49, p. 170; No. 21169/92, Dec. 31.8.94, unpublished).
• EKMR, 02.04.1992 - 18943/91

  MCALLISTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  However, where a settled sentencing policy appears to affect individuals in a discriminatory fashion, the Commission has taken the view that this may raise issues under Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 5 (Art. 14+5) of the Convention (see e.g. No. 11077/84, Dec. 13.10.86, D.R. 49 p. 170).
• EKMR, 02.04.1992 - 19000/91

  M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  However, where a settled sentencing policy appears to affect individuals in a discriminatory fashion, the Commission has taken the view that this may raise issues under Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 5 (Art. 14+5) of the Convention (see e.g. No. 11077/84, Dec. 13.10.86, D.R. 49 p. 170).
• EKMR, 14.04.1994 - 22564/93

  GRICE c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Where however procedures relating to the release of prisoners appear to operate in a discriminatory manner, the Commission has held that this may raise issues under Article 5 in conjunction with Article 14 (Art. 5+14) of the Convention (see eg. No. 11077/84, Dec. 13.10.86, D.R. 49 p. 170).