Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29793/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,29137) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29793/96
However, the scope of review by the Convention organs is limited and it is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see Eur. Court H.R., Winterwerp judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 18, para. 39, p. 20, paras. 45-46; Eur. Comm. H.R., No. 9997/82, Dec. 7.12.82, D.R. 31 p. 245). - EGMR, 28.10.1987 - 8695/79
Inze ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29793/96
There can be no room for application of Article 14 (Art. 14) unless the facts of the case fall within the ambit of one or more of such provisions (Eur. Court H.R., Inze judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A no. 126, p. 17, para. 36). - EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11152/84
CIULLA v. ITALY
Auszug aus EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29793/96
The Commission recalls that under international law, to which Article 26 (Art. 26) makes express reference, the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies demands the use of such remedies as are available and sufficient and relate to the breaches alleged (see, Eur. Court H.R., Ciulla judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, p. 15, para. 31; Brozicek judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, pp. 16-17, para. 34). - EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 10964/84
BROZICEK v. ITALY
Auszug aus EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29793/96
The Commission recalls that under international law, to which Article 26 (Art. 26) makes express reference, the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies demands the use of such remedies as are available and sufficient and relate to the breaches alleged (see, Eur. Court H.R., Ciulla judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, p. 15, para. 31; Brozicek judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, pp. 16-17, para. 34).