Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MIHAI TOMA v. ROMANIA

  Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 7 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Toma v. Romania

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06
• EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 1051/06

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.02.1995 - 17440/90

  WELCH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  Other factors that may be taken into account as relevant in this connection are the nature and purpose of the measure in question; its characterisation under national law; the procedures involved in the making and implementation of the measure; and its severity (see Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, §§ 27-28, Series A no. 307-A).

  It follows that the exception raised by the Government is inadmissible (see also Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, § 28, Series A no. 307-A).

• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  It reiterates that it is master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts and as it could decide to examine the complaint submitted to it under more than one of the Convention's provisions (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 54, ECHR 2009-...).

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, notably, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).

• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 19359/04

  Rückwirkende Aufhebung der Höchstdauer der Sicherungsverwahrung (Verurteilung; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  In the instant case, the Court notes that under the Emergency Ordinance the annulment of the driving licence was no longer left to the police's discretion, but became automatic for cases like the applicant's (contrast Coëme and Others, cited above, § 149; mutatis mutandis, Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, § 32, Series A no. 317-B; and M. v. Germany, no. 19359/04, §§ 127-128, 17 December 2009.

• EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

  Kokkinakis ./. Griechenland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, notably, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).
• EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 21906/04

  KAFKARIS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, notably, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 75909/01

  Sud Fondi S.r.l. u.a. ./. Italien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, notably, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).
• EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 73661/01

  NILSSON c. SUEDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  The Court has established in the case Maszni v. Romania (no. 59892/00, § 66, 21 September 2006) that although the annulment of a driving licence is regarded by the national law as an administrative measure, it constitutes rather a criminal matter for the purpose of Article 6 of the Convention, in so far as its severity gives it a punitive and dissuasive character pertaining to criminal sanctions (see also Welch, cited above, § 28; and Nilsson v. Sweden (dec.), no. 73661/01, 13 December 2005).
• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 15917/89

  JAMIL v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  In the instant case, the Court notes that under the Emergency Ordinance the annulment of the driving licence was no longer left to the police's discretion, but became automatic for cases like the applicant's (contrast Coëme and Others, cited above, § 149; mutatis mutandis, Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, § 32, Series A no. 317-B; and M. v. Germany, no. 19359/04, §§ 127-128, 17 December 2009.
• EGMR, 21.09.2006 - 59892/00

  MASZNI c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  The Court has established in the case Maszni v. Romania (no. 59892/00, § 66, 21 September 2006) that although the annulment of a driving licence is regarded by the national law as an administrative measure, it constitutes rather a criminal matter for the purpose of Article 6 of the Convention, in so far as its severity gives it a punitive and dissuasive character pertaining to criminal sanctions (see also Welch, cited above, § 28; and Nilsson v. Sweden (dec.), no. 73661/01, 13 December 2005).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen