Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 10809/06 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TURCAN v. MOLDOVA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5-1 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (5) Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 14437/05
MODARCA v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 10809/06
The administration added that a detailed video recording of the cell had been provided by the Government to the Court as evidence in the case of Modarca v. Moldova (no. 14437/05, 10 May 2007). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 10809/06
The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law on Article 3 of the Convention regarding, in particular, conditions of detention and medical assistance to detainees (see, among others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI; Ostrovar v. Moldova, no. 35207/03, §§ 76-79, 13 September 2005; and Sarban, cited above, §§ 75-77). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 28358/95
BARANOWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 10809/06
He relied on Article 186 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (see paragraph 15 below) and on the cases of Baranowski v. Poland (no. 28358/95, ECHR 2000-III) and Jecius v. Lithuania (no. 34578/97, ECHR 2000-IX), and claimed that, following the referral of the case to the trial court on 20 February 2006, his detention did not have a legal basis.
- EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 10809/06
He relied on Article 186 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (see paragraph 15 below) and on the cases of Baranowski v. Poland (no. 28358/95, ECHR 2000-III) and Jecius v. Lithuania (no. 34578/97, ECHR 2000-IX), and claimed that, following the referral of the case to the trial court on 20 February 2006, his detention did not have a legal basis. - BFH, 30.08.2013 - X B 28/13
Anforderungen an die Begründung der Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde bei Verfahrensrügen
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 10809/06
On 16 January 2006 the applicant was transferred to the remand centre of the Ministry of Justice no.29/13 (also known as Prison no. 13, former Prison no. 3) in Chisinau. - EGMR, 07.11.2006 - 30649/05
HOLOMIOV v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 10809/06
The Government referred to Article 53 of the Constitution, Article 1405 of the Civil Code and Law no. 1545 on compensation for damage caused by the illegal acts of the criminal investigation organs, prosecution and courts, as well as to the case of Drugalev v. the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of Finance, cited in Holomiov v. Moldova, (no. 30649/05, § 88, 7 November 2006). - EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 35207/03
OSTROVAR v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 10809/06
The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law on Article 3 of the Convention regarding, in particular, conditions of detention and medical assistance to detainees (see, among others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI; Ostrovar v. Moldova, no. 35207/03, §§ 76-79, 13 September 2005; and Sarban, cited above, §§ 75-77). - EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 39835/05
TURCAN AND TURCAN v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 10809/06
The applicant made a separate complaint regarding the initial period of his detention, until 3 February 2006 (the case of Ţurcan and Ţurcan v. Moldova, application no. 39835/05).
- EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 11353/06
[FRE]
Elle a pu ainsi observer une série de problèmes récurrents au sujet des prisons de ce pays, dont la surpopulation, le manque d'hygiène et de conditions matérielles appropriées, la mauvaise qualité et la quantité insuffisante de la nourriture, et l'absence de soins médicaux adéquats (voir, parmi d'autres, Becciev c. Moldova, no 9190/03, §§ 41-48, 4 octobre 2005, Holomiov, précité, §§ 113-122, Istratii, précité, §§ 48-59 et 68-72, Modarca, précité, §§ 63-69, Ciorap c. Moldova, no 12066/02, §§ 65-71, 19 juin 2007, Popovici c. Moldova, nos 289/04 et 41194/04, §§ 56-57, 27 novembre 2007, Turcan c. Moldova, no 10809/06, §§ 35-39, 27 novembre 2007, Malai c. Moldova, no 7101/06, §§ 33-35, 13 novembre 2008, Valeriu et Nicolae Rosca c. Moldova, no 41704/02, §§ 78-79, 20 octobre 2009, Gavrilovici c. Moldova, no 25464/05, §§ 42-44, 15 décembre 2009, I.D., précité, §§ 44-46, Oprea c. Moldova, no 38055/06, §§ 39-42, 21 décembre 2010, Rotaru c. Moldova, no 51216/06, §§ 33-42, 15 février 2011, Feraru c. Moldova, no 55792/08, §§ 41-46, 24 janvier 2012, Hadji c. Moldova, nos 32844/07 et 41378/07, §§ 19-20, 14 février 2012, Constantin Modarca c. République de Moldova, no 37829/08, §§ 25-27, 13 novembre 2012, Ciorap c. République de Moldova (no 3), no 32896/07, §§ 35-37, 4 décembre 2012, Mitrofan, précité, §§ 37-41, Ipati, précité, §§ 64-65 ; et Segheti, §§ 30-33). - EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 47203/06
[ENG]
As to the conditions of detention in Prison No. 13 between February and October 2006, the Court recalls that in Å¢urcan v. Moldova (no. 10809/06, §§ 35-39, 27 November 2007) it found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the applicant's poor conditions of detention in the same detention facility between February and September 2006. - EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 15868/07
[ENG]
- EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 4834/06
STRAISTEANU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
As to the conditions of detention in Prison No. 13 between September and November 2006, the Court recalls that in Å¢urcan v. Moldova (no. 10809/06, §§ 35-39, 27 November 2007) it found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the applicant's poor conditions of detention in the same detention facility between February and September 2006. - EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 21984/05
GOREA ET 1 AUTRE AFFAIRE CONTRE LA REPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
10809/06.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 21984/05, 10809/06 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GOREA ET 1 AUTRE AFFAIRE CONTRE LA REPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
Etat défendeur incité à payer la réparation au titre de la satisfaction équitable (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GOREA AND 1 OTHER CASE AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Respondent State urged to pay just satisfactions award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 21984/05
- EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 21984/05, 10809/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 10809/06
TURCAN v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 21984/05
10809/06.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".