Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GULYAN v. ARMENIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GULYAN v. ARMENIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

  MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 11244/12

  The first sentence of Article 2 § 1 enjoins the State not only to refrain from the intentional and unlawful taking of life, but also to take appropriate steps within its internal legal order to safeguard the lives of those within its jurisdiction (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2004-XI, and Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, § 208, ECHR 2011 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 37410/97

  KAMIL UZUN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 11244/12

  Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 2 of the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal question raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on these complaints (see, mutatis mutandis, Kamil Uzun v. Turkey, no. 37410/97, § 64, 10 May 2007, and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 11244/12

  In order to be effective, an investigation must firstly be adequate, that is it must be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts and, where appropriate, the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 233, 30 March 2016; Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç, cited above, § 172;, and Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 113, ECHR 2005-VII).
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 11244/12

  Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 2 of the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal question raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on these complaints (see, mutatis mutandis, Kamil Uzun v. Turkey, no. 37410/97, § 64, 10 May 2007, and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

  ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 11244/12

  In order to be effective, an investigation must firstly be adequate, that is it must be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts and, where appropriate, the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 233, 30 March 2016; Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç, cited above, § 172;, and Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 113, ECHR 2005-VII).

• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 48195/17

  TOROSIAN c. GRÈCE

  Déjà, la majorité aurait pu en tirer, comme nous le faisons, des conclusions spécifiques confirmant le constat que le Gouvernement ne s'est pas acquitté de manière satisfaisante de la charge de réfuter les allégations de mauvais traitements par la police formulées par le requérant (voir, par exemple, Mafalani c. Croatie, § 126, 9 juillet 2015 ; Gulyan c. Arménie, no 11244/12, § 91, 20 septembre 2018 ; Shuriyya Zeynalov c. Azerbaïdjan, §§ 48-62, 10 septembre 2020).
• EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 69517/11

  NANA MURADYAN v. ARMENIA

  Such decisions are not uncommon in the Armenian judicial system and are primarily aimed at pointing out flaws in the investigation which have undermined its effectiveness and the restoration of the rights of the victim in the course of pending, stayed or discontinued criminal proceedings (see, for example, Gulyan v. Armenia, no. 11244/12, §§ 54 and 60, 20 September 2018, where the courts quashed the decisions to discontinue the investigation twice during the same set of criminal proceedings).
• EGMR, 20.05.2021 - 13527/18

  LAPSHIN v. AZERBAIJAN

  Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 2 of the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaints (see, for instance, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Gulyan v. Armenia, no. 11244/12, § 95, 20 September 2018).
• EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 50375/07

  VAZAGASHVILI AND SHANAVA v. GEORGIA

  It concludes, therefore, that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the applicants" remaining complaints (see, amongst many other authorities, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014; Gulyan v. Armenia, no. 11244/12, § 95, 20 September 2018; and Babat and Others v. Turkey, no. 44936/04, § 44, 12 January 2010).