Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROSSI contre la FRANCE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROSSI v. FRANCE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.11.2002 - 58442/00

  LAVENTS c. LETTONIE

  Le non-respect, par un tribunal, des dispositions susvisées, emporte en principe violation de l'article 6 § 1 (voir Zand c. Autriche, requête no 7360/76, rapport de la Commission du 12 octobre 1978, DR 15, p. 70, §§ 68-71, et Rossi c. France, requête no 11879/85, décision de la Commission du 6 décembre 1989, DR 63, p. 105).
• EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 11770/08

  [ENG]

  The Court reiterates that the phrase "established by law" in Article 6 § 1 also means "established in accordance with law" (see, for instance, Rossi v. France, no. 11879/85, Commission decision of 6 December 1989, Decisions and Reports 63).
• EGMR, 02.04.2013 - 23103/07

  [ENG]

  The Court reiterates that the phrase "established by law" in Article 6 § 1 also means "established in accordance with law" (see, for instance, Rossi v. France, no. 11879/85, Commission decision of 6 December 1989, Decisions and Reports 63, p.105).

• EGMR, 30.11.2000 - 31611/96

  NIKULA v. FINLAND

  The fact that a judge has participated in previous proceedings concerning the same party does not in itself justify doubts as to his or her impartiality (see, e.g., no. 11879/85, 6.12.1989, D. R. 65, p. 232, and no. 17722/91, 8.4.1991, D. R. 69, p. 345).
• EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 41585/98

  LEHTINEN v. FINLAND

  The fact that a judge has participated in previous proceedings concerning the same party does not in itself justify doubts as to his or her impartiality (see, e.g. no. 11879/85, 6.12.1989, D. R. 65, p. 232, and no. 17722/91, 8.4.1991, D. R. 69, p. 345).
• EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 30519/96

  KARJALAINEN v. FINLAND

  e.g. No. 11879/85, Dec.