Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RUIZ MATEOS v. the UNITED KINGDOM

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (18)Zitiert selbst (8)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.09.1988 - 13021/87

  24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 17 at paras.
• EKMR, 12.10.1982 - 8588/79

  BRAMELID and MALMSTRÖM v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.09.1988 - 13021/87

  8588/79 and 8589/79, Bramelid and Malmström v. Sweden,.
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.09.1988 - 13021/87

  April 1988, Series A no. 131, paras.

• EKMR, 15.12.1983 - 10358/83

  C. v. the UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.09.1988 - 13021/87

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention (e.g. No. 10358/83,.
• EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 7987/77

  COMPANY X. v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.09.1988 - 13021/87

  71, 77; No. 7987/77, Dec.
• EKMR, 08.02.1973 - 5258/71

  X. v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.09.1988 - 13021/87

  222, 236; No. 5258/71,.
• EKMR, 04.07.1983 - 10000/82

  H. v. the UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.09.1988 - 13021/87

  context No. 10000/82, Dec.
• EKMR, 01.12.1986 - 11949/86

  D.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 08.09.1988 - 13021/87

  4.7.83, D.R. 33 p. 247; No. 11949/86, Dec.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 16812/17

  RUSTAVI 2 BROADCASTING COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  The Court notes that private-law disputes do not themselves engage the responsibility of the State under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Ruiz Mateos v. the United Kingdom, no. 13021/87, Commission decision of 8 September 1988, Decisions and Reports (DR) 57, pp.
• EGMR, 12.12.2013 - 39544/05

  ZAGREBACKA BANKA D.D. v. CROATIA

  The Court notes at the outset that the enforcement and the bankruptcy proceedings in the present case concern a civil-law dispute between private parties and therefore do not themselves engage the responsibility of the State under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Ruiz Mateos v. the United Kingdom, no. 13021/87, Commission decision of 8 September 1988, Decisions and Reports (DR) 57, pp.
• EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 72783/11

  THEO NATIONAL CONSTRUCT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  The Court reiterates in this respect that proceedings concerning civil-law disputes between private parties do not engage by themselves the responsibility of the State under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (Ruiz Mateos v. the United Kingdom, no. 13021/87, Commission decision of 8 September 1988, Decisions and Reports (DR) 57 p. 268; Tormala v. Finland (dec.), no. 41258/98, 16 March 2004; Eskelinen v. Finland (dec.), no. 7274/02, 3 February 2004; Kranz v. Poland (dec.), no. 6214/02, 10 September 2002; and Skowronski v. Poland (dec.), no. 52595/99, 28 June 2001).

• EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 6169/13

  MINDEK v. CROATIA

  The Court notes at the outset that... civil-law dispute[s] between private parties... do not themselves engage the responsibility of the State under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Ruiz Mateos v. the United Kingdom, no. 13021/87, Commission decision of 8 September 1988, Decisions and Reports (DR) 57, pp.
• EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 6214/02

  KRANZ v. POLAND

  The Court notes that the domestic proceedings in the present case concern a civil law dispute between private individuals and, therefore, they may not themselves engage the responsibility of the State under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis, application no. 13021/87, Ruiz Mateos v. the United Kingdom, decision of 8 September 1988, DR 57, p. 268).
• EGMR, 14.03.2000 - 46833/99

  DE DIEGO NAFRIA contre l'ESPAGNE

  Pour ce qui est de l'article 13, 1a Cour rappelle que les garanties de cette disposition s'effacent devant celles de l'article 6 § 1 (cf., par exemple, n° 13021/87, déc. 8.9.1988, D.R. 57, p. 268).
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 24321/05

  INVESTYLIA PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED v. CYPRUS

  The function of the domestic courts in disputes between private parties is to determine the nature and extent of their mutual duties and obligations, with the inevitable consequence that one party may ultimately be unsuccessful in the litigation in question (see, amongst a number of authorities, Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 43, ECHR 2002 VIII; Kuchar and Stis v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 37527/97, 21 October 1998; Ruiz Mateos v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 13021/87, 8 September 1988 and Bramelid and Malmström v. Sweden nos.
• EGMR, 28.06.2001 - 52595/99

  SKOWRONSKI v. POLAND

  The Court notes that the domestic proceedings in the present case concern a civil law dispute between private individuals and therefore they may not themselves engage the responsibility of the State under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis, Ruiz Mateos v. the United Kingdom, application no. 13021/87, Commission decision of 8 September 1988, DR 57, p. 268).
• EGMR, 30.11.2000 - 42042/98

  PERYT v. POLAND

  The Court notes that the domestic proceedings in the present case concern a civil law dispute between private individuals and therefore they may not themselves engage the responsibility of the State under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis, application no. 13021/87, Ruiz Mateos v. the United Kingdom, decision of 8 September 1988, DR 57, p. 268).
• EGMR, 11.05.2000 - 43275/98

  QUESTEL contre la FRANCE

  Or la Cour rappelle que le « simple fait qu'une instance judiciaire fournisse un forum pour trancher un tel litige de droit privé ne donne pas lieu à une atteinte par l'Etat aux droits de propriété garantis par l'article 1er du protocole N°1 " (voir N° 13021/87, déc. 8.9.88, Décisions et rapports (D.R.) 57, p. 268).
• EKMR, 27.10.1998 - 20094/92

  CISE HOLDING S.A. ET AUTRES contre la SUISSE
• EGMR, 18.11.2010 - 17487/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 14.01.2003 - 75108/01

  PADO v. POLAND
• EKMR, 21.10.1998 - 37527/97

  KUCHAR AND STIS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 25646/94

  YOUNG v. IRELAND
• EKMR, 19.01.1998 - 26760/95

  WERNER v. POLAND
• EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 27558/95

  BURROWS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 28477/95

  DOBBIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM