Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ERDOGAN YILMAZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (12)Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 33750/03

  YETER v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 19374/03

  [1] An application concerning this incident is currently pending before the Court (application no. 33750/03, Yeter (Yumli) and others v. Turkey).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 19374/03

  As to the seriousness of the treatment in question, the Court reiterates that, under its case-law in this sphere (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, §§ 96-97, ECHR 1999-V), in order to determine whether a particular form of ill-treatment should be qualified as torture, it must have regard to the distinction, embodied in Article 3, between this notion and that of inhuman or degrading treatment.
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 19374/03

  The relevant domestic law and practice in force at the material time are outlined in Batı and others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 96-100, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).

• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 48130/99

  IVAN VASILEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 19374/03

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 3 (see, in particular, Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 62, 12 April 2007; Yavuz v. Turkey, no. 67137/01, § 38, 10 January 2006; Emirhan Yıldız and Others v. Turkey, no. 61898/00, §§ 41-42, 5 December 2006; Diri v. Turkey, no. 68351/01, §§ 35-39, 31 July 2007).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 19374/03

  The relevant domestic law and practice in force at the material time are outlined in Batı and others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 96-100, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 31.07.2007 - 68351/01

  DIRI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 19374/03

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 3 (see, in particular, Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 62, 12 April 2007; Yavuz v. Turkey, no. 67137/01, § 38, 10 January 2006; Emirhan Yıldız and Others v. Turkey, no. 61898/00, §§ 41-42, 5 December 2006; Diri v. Turkey, no. 68351/01, §§ 35-39, 31 July 2007).
• EGMR, 08.08.2006 - 49048/99

  HUSEYIN ESEN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 19374/03

  In this context, the Court reiterates its earlier finding in a number of cases that the Turkish criminal law system can prove to be far from rigorous and have no dissuasive effect capable of ensuring the effective prevention of unlawful acts perpetrated by State agents if criminal proceedings brought against the latter are dropped for being time-barred (see among others, Yesil and Sevim, cited above, § 42, and Hüseyin Esen v. Turkey, no. 49048/99, § 63, 8 August 2006).
• EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 34738/04

  YESIL ET SEVIM c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 19374/03

  The Court reaffirms that when an agent of the State is accused of crimes that violate Article 3, the criminal proceedings and sentencing must not be time-barred and the granting of an amnesty or pardon should not be permissible (see Yesil and Sevim v. Turkey, no. 34738/04, § 38, 5 June 2007).
• EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 67137/01

  YAVUZ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 19374/03

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 3 (see, in particular, Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 62, 12 April 2007; Yavuz v. Turkey, no. 67137/01, § 38, 10 January 2006; Emirhan Yıldız and Others v. Turkey, no. 61898/00, §§ 41-42, 5 December 2006; Diri v. Turkey, no. 68351/01, §§ 35-39, 31 July 2007).
• EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 61898/00

  EMIRHAN YILDIZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 19374/03

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 3 (see, in particular, Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 62, 12 April 2007; Yavuz v. Turkey, no. 67137/01, § 38, 10 January 2006; Emirhan Yıldız and Others v. Turkey, no. 61898/00, §§ 41-42, 5 December 2006; Diri v. Turkey, no. 68351/01, §§ 35-39, 31 July 2007).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.09.2019 - 36617/07

  AFET SÜREYYA EREN AGAINST TURKEY AND 130 OTHER CASES

  19374/03.
• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 32715/19

  SCAVONE c. ITALIE

  La Cour a ainsi conclu à la violation des garanties procédurales de l'article 3 dans des affaires où la prescription avait joué parce que les autorités n'avaient pas agi avec la promptitude et la diligence requises (voir, entre autres, Bati et autres c. Turquie, nos 33097/96 et 57834/00, §§ 97 et 145-147, CEDH 2004-IV (extraits), Abdülsamet Yaman, précité, § 59, Yesil et Sevim c. Turquie, no 34738/04, §§ 38-42, 5 juin 2007, Erdogan Yilmaz et autres c. Turquie, no 19374/03, § 57, 14 octobre 2008, Erdal Aslan c. Turquie, nos 25060/02 et 1705/03, §§ 75-79, 2 décembre 2008, Paduret c. Moldova, no 33134/03, § 75, 5 janvier 2010, Karagöz et autres c. Turquie, nos 14352/05 et 2 autres, §§ 53-55, 13 juillet 2010, Savin c. Ukraine, no 34725/08, §§ 70-71, 16 février 2012, Ugur c. Turquie, no 37308/05, § 105, 13 janvier 2015, et Barovov c. Russie, no 9183/09, § 42, 15 juin 2021).
• EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 33750/03

  YETER v. TURKEY

  An application concerning the events prior to Mr Süleyman Yeter's death was examined by the Court in the case of ErdoÄŸan Yılmaz and Others v. Turkey (no. 19374/03, 14 October 2008).

• EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 22867/05

  [ENG]

  Lastly, the Court reiterates that, in a number of cases concerning alleged ill-treatment in custody where the prosecution of the alleged perpetrators has been time-barred following lengthy proceedings, it has noted that the criminal-law system has proved to be far from rigorous in ensuring the effective prevention of unlawful acts such as those complained of by the applicants (see, among other authorities, Müdet Kömürcü v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 40160/05, § 30, 21 July 2009; SalmanoÄŸlu and Polattas v. Turkey, no. 15828/03, § 101; 17 March 2009; and ErdoÄŸan Yılmaz and Others v. Turkey, no. 19374/03, § 57, 14 October 2008).
• EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 14352/05

  [ENG]

  The Court reiterates that, in a number of similar cases where prosecutions have been time-barred following lengthy proceedings, it has noted that the criminal law system has proved to be far from rigorous and lacking in the dissuasive effect capable of ensuring the effective prevention of unlawful acts such as those complained of by the applicants (see Müdet Kömürcü, cited above, § 30; SalmanoÄŸlu and Polattas v. Turkey, no. 15828/03, § 101, 17 March 2009; ErdoÄŸan Yılmaz and Others v. Turkey, no. 19374/03, § 57, 14 October 2008).
• EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 30685/05

  BARAN AND HUN v. TURKEY

  In this connection, the Court reaffirms that when an agent of the State is accused of crimes which violate Article 3, the criminal proceedings and sentencing must not be time-barred and the granting of an amnesty or pardon should not be permissible (see ErdoÄŸan Yılmaz and Others v. Turkey, no. 19374/03, § 56, 14 October 2008).
• EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 4390/03

  [FRE]

  En outre, lorsqu'un agent de l'État est accusé de mauvais traitements, il est d'une extrême importance, aux fins d'un « recours effectif ", que la procédure pénale et la peine ne soient pas frappées par la prescription (cf. Erdogan et autres c. Turquie, no 19374/03, §§ 54-55, 14 octobre 2008).
• EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 40160/05

  [ENG]

  The Court reaffirms that when, in principle, an agent of the State is accused of crimes that violate Article 3 of the Convention, the criminal proceedings and sentencing must not become time-barred and the granting of an amnesty or pardon should not be permissible (see ErdoÄŸan Yılmaz and Others v. Turkey, no. 19374/03, § 56, 14 October 2008, and, mutatis mutandis, Ali and Ayse Duran v. Turkey, no. 42942/02, § 72, 8 April 2008).
• EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 27566/06

  [ENG]

  In this connection, the Court reaffirms that when an agent of the State is accused of crimes that violate Article 3, the criminal proceedings and sentencing must not be time-barred and the granting of an amnesty or pardon should not be permissible (see ErdoÄŸan Yılmaz and Others v. Turkey, no. 19374/03, § 56, 14 October 2008).
• EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 31300/05

  [ENG]

  The Court reaffirms that when an agent of the State is accused of crimes that violate Article 3, the criminal proceedings and sentencing must not be time-barred and the granting of an amnesty or pardon should not be permissible (see ErdoÄŸan Yılmaz and Others v. Turkey, no. 19374/03, § 56, 14 October 2008).
• EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 3076/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 35160/05

  [ENG]