Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KHAYDAROV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 3 (in case of extradition to Tajikistan) Violation of Art. 5-1 Violation of Art. 5-4 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 40081/14

  Russland verurteilt - Keine Zwangsausweisung nach Syrien

  Having regard to these findings, it considers that it is not necessary to examine this complaint separately on the merits (see, among other authorities, Gaforov v. Russia, no. 25404/09, § 144, 21 October 2010; Khaydarov v. Russia, no. 21055/09, § 156, 20 May 2010; and Khodzhayev v. Russia, no. 52466/08, § 151, 12 May 2010).
• VG Arnsberg, 17.12.2024 - 1 L 1157/24

  Tadschikistan: Ablehnung des Antrags auf Gewährung vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes im …

  Rn. 160 vgl. Urteil vom 20. Mai 2010 - 21055/09 -, Khaydarov gegen Russland, Rn. 110 f., abrufbar unter: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid %22: [%22001-98832%22]},.

  Rn. 168 Vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 20. Mai 2010 - 21055/09 -, Khaydarov gegen Russland, Rn. 34 und 36, abrufbar unter: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng# {%22itemid%22:[%22001-98832%22]}.

  Rn. 170 Vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 20. Mai 2010 - 21055/09 -, Khaydarov gegen Russland, Rn. 111, abrufbar unter: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22 itemid%22:[%22001-98832%22]}.

• EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 67474/11

  AZIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Thus, the Court has already examined cases involving extradition to Tajikistan of persons charged with politically and/or religiously motivated criminal offences (see Khodzhayev v. Russia, no. 52466/08, 12 May 2010; Khaydarov v. Russia, no. 21055/09, 20 May 2010; and Gaforov, cited above).

• EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 26417/10

  OUABOUR c. BELGIQUE

  Partant, s'il est vrai que les faits historiques présentent un intérêt dans la mesure où ils permettent d'éclairer la situation actuelle et son évolution probable, ce sont les circonstances présentes qui sont déterminantes (Mamatkoulov et Askarov c. Turquie [GC], nos 46827/99 et 46951/99, § 69, CEDH 2005-I, Saadi, précité, § 133, et Khaydarov c. Russie, no 21055/09, § 100, 20 mai 2010).
• EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 31890/11

  [ENG]

  Furthermore, he referred to the Court's position in the case of Saadi v. Italy ([GC] no. 37201/06, ECHR 2008) and the cases concerning extradition to Tajikistan: Khodzhayev, cited above; Khaydarov v. Russia (no. 21055/09, 20 May 2010); and Gaforov, cited above, to the effect that diplomatic assurances were not sufficient to conclude that a State would refrain from subjecting the individual extradited to torture when various independent sources pointed to the existence of such practice in that State.
• EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 33809/08

  LABSI v. SLOVAKIA

  The relevant principles are summed up, for example, in Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, §§ 113-121, 23 February 2012; Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06, §§ 124-148, ECHR 2008; Boutagni v. France, no. 42360/08, §§ 44-45, 18 November 2010; Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, §§ 115, 126 and 127, 24 April 2008; Khaydarov v. Russia, no. 21055/09, §§ 96-100 and 111, 20 May 2010; Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, §§ 334-339 and 344, ECHR 2005-III; Garayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 53688/08, §§ 67-75, 10 June 2010; Kolesnik v. Russia, no. 26876/08, § 73, 17 June 2010; Ben Khemais v. Italy, no. 246/07, §§ 53-64, 24 February 2009; or Koktysh v. Ukraine, no. 43707/07, §§ 57-59 and 63-64, 10 December 2009.
• EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 49747/11

  [ENG]

  Having regard to the finding relating to Article 3 (see paragraph 77 above), the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine this complaint separately on the merits (see, among other authorities, Gaforov v. Russia, no. 25404/09, § 144, 21 October 2010; Khaydarov v. Russia, no. 21055/09, § 156, 20 May 2010; and Khodzhayev v. Russia, no. 52466/08, § 151, 12 May 2010).