Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ANAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 8 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 18.10.2006 - 46410/99

  Rechtssache ÜNER gegen die NIEDERLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 21783/08

  The Court recalls that the criteria used to determine whether an interference with private or family life in an expulsion case is "necessary in a democratic society" have been summarised by the Grand Chamber as follows (see Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, §§ 57-58, ECHR 2006-XII):.
• EGMR, 06.02.2001 - 44599/98

  BENSAID c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 21783/08

  The Court recalls its findings in the case of Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, §§ 37-40, ECHR 2001-I, which involved an Algerian man diagnosed with schizophrenia and psychotic illness, who was to be removed from the United Kingdom to Algeria.
• EGMR, 07.11.2000 - 31519/96

  KWAKYE-NTI ET DUFIE contre les PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 21783/08

  However, the Court has previously held that there will be no family life between parents and adult children or between adult siblings unless they can demonstrate additional elements of dependence (Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 97, ECHR 2003 X; Kwakye-Nti and Dufie v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 31519/96, 7 November 2000).
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 2345/02

  SAID v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 21783/08

  The Court finds it appropriate to deal with the complaint under Article 2 together with the related complaint under Article 3 and will proceed on this basis (see Said v. the Netherlands, no. 2345/02, § 37, ECHR 2005-VI and D. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 May 1997, Reports 1997-III, § 59).
• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 53080/07

  MIAH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 21783/08

  The Court recalls that, as Article 8 protects the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings and the outside world and can sometimes embrace aspects of an individual's social identity, it must be accepted that the totality of social ties between settled migrants such as the applicant and the community in which they are living constitutes part of the concept of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8. Indeed it will be a rare case where a settled migrant will be unable to demonstrate that his or her deportation would interfere with his or her private life as guaranteed by Article 8 (see Miah v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, § 17, 27 April 2010).

• EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 38030/12

  KHAN v. GERMANY

  Der Gerichtshof weist erneut darauf hin, dass in Ausweisungsfällen nicht alle niedergelassenen Migranten gleich starke familiäre oder soziale Bindungen in dem Vertragsstaat, in dem sie leben, haben werden, dass aber die relative Stärke oder Schwäche solcher Bindungen angemessener berücksichtigt wird, indem die Verhältnismäßigkeit der Abschiebung des Antragstellers gemäß Artikel 8 Abs. 2 untersucht wird (siehe Anam./. Vereinigtes Königreich (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 21783/08, 7. Juni 2011).

  Nichtsdestotrotz muss die andauernde Gefahr für die öffentliche Sicherheit, die die Beschwerdeführerin weiterhin darstellt, berücksichtigt werden (siehe in analoger Anwendung, Anam./. Vereinigtes Königreich (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 21783/08, 7. Juni 2011).

• EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 29999/04

  MAMASAKHLISI v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIA

  The Court's assessment 282. The Court has previously held that no family life can be claimed between parents and adult children or between adult siblings unless they can demonstrate additional elements of dependence (see Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 97, ECHR 2003-X; see also Kwakye-Nti and Dufie v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 31519/96, 7 November 2000, and Anam v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 21783/08, 7 June 2011).
• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 52178/10

  SAMSONNIKOV v. ESTONIA

  cit., and Anam v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 21783/08, 7 June 2011).