Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SEMENOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom ...

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (22)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12

  Russland verurteilt: 25.000 Euro wegen Festnahme nach Demo

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 74086/16

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 69-84, 20 September 2016, concerning examination of criminal cases in the absence of a prosecuting party in the judicial proceedings governed by the CAO; Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, §§ 106-225, 26 April 2016, related to disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of solo manifestations; Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013; and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016, concerning disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of public assemblies).

  Detention as an administrative suspect after the offence record had been compiled, until the hearing before the first instance court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 149-52, 5 January 2016, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019).

  11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

  11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

  11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

• EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08

  KARELIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 74086/16

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 69-84, 20 September 2016, concerning examination of criminal cases in the absence of a prosecuting party in the judicial proceedings governed by the CAO; Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, §§ 106-225, 26 April 2016, related to disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of solo manifestations; Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013; and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016, concerning disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of public assemblies).

  Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 69-84, 20 September 2016).

  Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 69-84, 20 September 2016).

  Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 69-84, 20 September 2016).

• EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 21613/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 74086/16

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 69-84, 20 September 2016, concerning examination of criminal cases in the absence of a prosecuting party in the judicial proceedings governed by the CAO; Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, §§ 106-225, 26 April 2016, related to disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of solo manifestations; Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013; and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016, concerning disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of public assemblies).

  11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

  11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

  11 (2) - disproportionate measures against participants of peaceful public assemblies (Kasparov and Others v. Russia no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, and Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 102-42, 5 January 2016).

• EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 22/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 74086/16

  Final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/08/2019.

  Final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/08/2019.

  Final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/08/2019.

• KAG Mainz, 30.10.2008 - M 26/08

  Eingruppierung Kirchenmusiker

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 74086/16

  26/08/2019.

  Final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/08/2019.

• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 47598/08

  TIMISHEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 74086/16

  The law also required that such escorting and detention be an "exceptional case" and necessary for the prompt and proper examination of the alleged administrative case or to secure the enforcement of any penalty to be imposed (see, for example, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, and Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, § 71, 15 November 2018), and that the use of the escort measure be properly documented (see Timishev v. Russia [Committee], no. 47598/08, § 21, 28 November 2017, and Kalyapin v. Russia, no. 6095/09, § 76, 23 July 2019).

  No written record of the applicant's escort and detention (Art. 27.2 § 3 CAO) (see Timishev v. Russia [Committee], no. 47598/08, § 21, 28 November 2017).

• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 5865/07

  BUTKEVICH v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 74086/16

  The law also required that such escorting and detention be an "exceptional case" and necessary for the prompt and proper examination of the alleged administrative case or to secure the enforcement of any penalty to be imposed (see, for example, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, and Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, § 71, 15 November 2018), and that the use of the escort measure be properly documented (see Timishev v. Russia [Committee], no. 47598/08, § 21, 28 November 2017, and Kalyapin v. Russia, no. 6095/09, § 76, 23 July 2019).

  Detention as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment of "exceptional circumstances" under Art. 27.3 § 1 CAO, and beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65,.

• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 72051/17

  KORNEYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 74086/16

  The authorities' failure to comply with those requirements, in the Court's view, led to it finding a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see, in particular, Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019; Kalyapin, cited above, §§ 76-79; and Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

  Detention as an administrative suspect after the offence record had been compiled, until the hearing before the first instance court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 149-52, 5 January 2016, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019).

• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 18.02.2005 - 12/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 74086/16

  12/02/2020.
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.06.2012 - 10/12

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 74086/16

  10/12/2019.
• KAGH, 07.06.2013 - M 22/12

  Zustimmung der MAV beim Einsatz von Dienstleistungskräften (Anästhesieteam) - zum …
• KAG Münster, 28.01.2010 - 26/09

  Kostentragungspflicht des Dienstgebers für die Hinzuziehung eines …
• EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 10/10

  BRUNNER v. TURKEY
• KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 18/06
• RG, 18.05.1905 - 20/05

  Ist fahrlässige Übertretung der Vorschrift des § 368 Nr. 10 St.G.B.'s strafbar?
• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 54381/08

  TSVETKOVA v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications
• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 25501/07

  NOVIKOVA v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications
• EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 50271/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 11.12.2014 - 1253/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 10810/15

  SMADIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.07.2019 - 6095/09

  KALYAPIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 17105/18

  AKHTYAMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VG Köln, 05.12.2023 - 12 K 2019/22
  Rn. 18 2505/20 -, juris, sowie das österreichische Vorabersuchen an den EuGH vom 05.11.2021 - C-663/21 -, juris wegen besonderer Schwierigkeiten rechtlicher Art und grundsätzlicher Bedeutung mit Beschluss vom 09.12.2022 auf die Kammer rückübertragen hat.