Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SALIKOVA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (17)Zitiert selbst (19)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 25270/06

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 2999/03

  DOVGUCHITS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 25270/06

  The Court recalls that in general the most appropriate form of redress in respect of violations found is to put applicant as far as possible in the position he or she would have been in if the Convention requirements had not been disregarded (see, among many other authorities, Dovguchits v. Russia, no. 2999/03, § 48, 7 June 2007).
• EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 22892/03

  BAKIYEVETS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 25270/06

  The Court reiterates that according to its case-law there was at the material time no effective remedy under Russian law capable of affording redress for the unreasonable length of civil proceedings (see, among many other authorities, Kormacheva, cited above, §§ 61-62; Kuzin v. Russia, no. 22118/02, §§ 42-46, 9 June 2005; Bakiyevets v. Russia, no. 22892/03, § 53, 15 June 2006; Markova v. Russia, no. 13119/03, § 31, 8 January 2009; and Zaytsev and Others v. Russia, no. 42046/06, § 48, 25 June 2009).

• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 13119/03

  MARKOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 25270/06

  The Court reiterates that according to its case-law there was at the material time no effective remedy under Russian law capable of affording redress for the unreasonable length of civil proceedings (see, among many other authorities, Kormacheva, cited above, §§ 61-62; Kuzin v. Russia, no. 22118/02, §§ 42-46, 9 June 2005; Bakiyevets v. Russia, no. 22892/03, § 53, 15 June 2006; Markova v. Russia, no. 13119/03, § 31, 8 January 2009; and Zaytsev and Others v. Russia, no. 42046/06, § 48, 25 June 2009).
• EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 37645/04

  LESNOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 25270/06

  Therefore the Court considers that the Government shall secure, by appropriate means, the enforcement of the judgment of 22 November 2007 in the case no. 2-1467-07 (see Lesnova v. Russia, no. 37645/04, § 25, 24 January 2008).
• EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 42046/06

  ZAYTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 25270/06

  The Court reiterates that according to its case-law there was at the material time no effective remedy under Russian law capable of affording redress for the unreasonable length of civil proceedings (see, among many other authorities, Kormacheva, cited above, §§ 61-62; Kuzin v. Russia, no. 22118/02, §§ 42-46, 9 June 2005; Bakiyevets v. Russia, no. 22892/03, § 53, 15 June 2006; Markova v. Russia, no. 13119/03, § 31, 8 January 2009; and Zaytsev and Others v. Russia, no. 42046/06, § 48, 25 June 2009).
• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 22118/02

  Kuzin ./. Russland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 25270/06

  The Court reiterates that according to its case-law there was at the material time no effective remedy under Russian law capable of affording redress for the unreasonable length of civil proceedings (see, among many other authorities, Kormacheva, cited above, §§ 61-62; Kuzin v. Russia, no. 22118/02, §§ 42-46, 9 June 2005; Bakiyevets v. Russia, no. 22892/03, § 53, 15 June 2006; Markova v. Russia, no. 13119/03, § 31, 8 January 2009; and Zaytsev and Others v. Russia, no. 42046/06, § 48, 25 June 2009).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 25270/06

  In addition, only delays attributable to the State may justify a finding of a failure to comply with the "reasonable time" requirement (see, among other authorities, Zimmermann and Steiner v. Switzerland, 13 July 1983, p. 11, § 24, Series A no. 66; see also Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 25270/06

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 25270/06

  The Court reiterates that an unreasonably long delay in the enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 13.07.1983 - 8737/79

  Zimmermann und Steiner ./. Schweiz
• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90

  YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98

  WIERCISZEWSKA v. POLAND
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 22000/03

  RAYLYAN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 19567/02

  MATICA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 08.06.2016 - 1295/02

  NICOLAU ET 79 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 25.03.2008 - 11549/02

  FALIMONOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.11.2005 - 38020/03

  ANTONOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 4487/04

  [ENG]

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 13122/11

  KOROTYAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to secure, by appropriate means, enforcement of the judgment in the applicant's favour (see Pridatchenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 2191/03 and 3 others, § 68, 21 June 2007, and Salikova v. Russia, no. 25270/06, § 83, 15 July 2010).
• EGMR, 19.06.2014 - 39814/04

  PALACHEVA v. RUSSIA

  It was incumbent upon the domestic authorities to ensure that the national law provided clear guidance on the application of the courts" jurisdiction (see Salikova v. Russia, no. 25270/06, § 58, 15 July 2010).
• EGMR, 30.11.2017 - 33064/07

  KAZACHKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to secure, by appropriate means, enforcement of the judgment in the applicants' favour (see Pridatchenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 2191/03 and 3 others, § 68, 21 June 2007, and Salikova v. Russia, no. 25270/06, § 83, 15 July 2010).

• EGMR, 12.10.2017 - 325/07

  ZAYNETDINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to secure, by appropriate means, enforcement of the judgment in the applicants' favour (see Pridatchenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 2191/03 and 3 others, § 68, 21 June 2007, and Salikova v. Russia, no. 25270/06, § 83, 15 July 2010).
• EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 5489/10

  YUNUSOVA v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that, in so far as the judgments in the applicant's favour remain in force, the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to secure, by appropriate means, enforcement of those judgments (see Pridatchenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 2191/03 and 3 others, § 68, 21 June 2007, and Salikova v. Russia, no. 25270/06, § 83, 15 July 2010).
• EGMR, 18.10.2018 - 27368/06

  SAFRONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to secure, by appropriate means, enforcement of the judgments in the applicants' favour (see Pridatchenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 2191/03 and 3 others, § 68, 21 June 2007, and Salikova v. Russia, no. 25270/06, § 83, 15 July 2010).
• EGMR, 14.12.2017 - 20435/09

  ARTYUSHKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to secure, by appropriate means, enforcement of the judgment in the applicants' favour (see Pridatchenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 2191/03 and 3 others, § 68, 21 June 2007, and Salikova v. Russia, no. 25270/06, § 83, 15 July 2010).
• EGMR, 30.11.2017 - 19388/07

  KURUSHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to secure, by appropriate means, enforcement of the judgment in the applicants' favour (see Pridatchenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 2191/03 and 3 others, § 68, 21 June 2007, and Salikova v. Russia, no. 25270/06, § 83, 15 July 2010).
• EGMR, 12.10.2017 - 66076/11

  MARKINY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to secure, by appropriate means, enforcement of the judgment in the applicants' favour (see Pridatchenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 2191/03 and 3 others, § 68, 21 June 2007, and Salikova v. Russia, no. 25270/06, § 83, 15 July 2010).
• EGMR, 12.10.2017 - 35187/07

  AVDEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to secure, by appropriate means, enforcement of the judgment in the applicants' favour (see Pridatchenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 2191/03 and 3 others, § 68, 21 June 2007, and Salikova v. Russia, no. 25270/06, § 83, 15 July 2010).
• EGMR, 12.10.2017 - 34867/06

  MOROZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.10.2017 - 522/06

  FEDORENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.10.2017 - 2349/06

  DUKHANIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.10.2017 - 48691/13

  BELONOZHKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.10.2017 - 33614/12

  BAYKINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.02.2019 - 60708/13

  KONSTANTINOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.10.2017 - 8356/08

  OKOLELOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA