Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YANKOV AND MANCHEV v. BULGARIA

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (28)Zitiert selbst (11)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 27207/04

  Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy in respect of an arguable complaint of a breach of the requirement of Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 146-57, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 27207/04

  The prominent place held in a democratic society by the right to a fair trial favours a substantive, rather than a formal, conception of "charge"; it requires the Court to look behind the appearances and examine the realities of the procedure in question (see Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 44, Series A no. 35, and Adolf v. Austria, 26 March 1982, § 30, Series A no. 49).
• EGMR, 26.03.1982 - 8269/78

  Adolf ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 27207/04

  The prominent place held in a democratic society by the right to a fair trial favours a substantive, rather than a formal, conception of "charge"; it requires the Court to look behind the appearances and examine the realities of the procedure in question (see Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 44, Series A no. 35, and Adolf v. Austria, 26 March 1982, § 30, Series A no. 49).

• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 27207/04

  A remedy is effective if it prevents the alleged violation or its continuation or provides adequate redress for any beach that has already occurred (ibid., § 158, and Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 23.09.2004 - 54178/00

  OSMANOV AND YUSEINOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 27207/04

  The Court has previously found that until 2003 Bulgarian law did not provide remedies allowing those accused in criminal proceedings to expedite the determination of the charges against them (see Osmanov and Yuseinov v. Bulgaria, nos. 54178/00 and 59901/00, §§ 38-40, 23 September 2004; Sidjimov v. Bulgaria, no. 55057/00, § 41, 27 January 2005; Nalbantova v. Bulgaria, no. 38106/02, § 34, 27 September 2007; and Atanasov and Ovcharov v. Bulgaria, no. 61596/00, § 56, 17 January 2008).
• EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 61596/00

  ATANASOV AND OVCHAROV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 27207/04

  The Court has previously found that until 2003 Bulgarian law did not provide remedies allowing those accused in criminal proceedings to expedite the determination of the charges against them (see Osmanov and Yuseinov v. Bulgaria, nos. 54178/00 and 59901/00, §§ 38-40, 23 September 2004; Sidjimov v. Bulgaria, no. 55057/00, § 41, 27 January 2005; Nalbantova v. Bulgaria, no. 38106/02, § 34, 27 September 2007; and Atanasov and Ovcharov v. Bulgaria, no. 61596/00, § 56, 17 January 2008).
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 43428/02

  MYASHEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 27207/04

  Taking into account the particular circumstances and the awards made in similar cases (see, for instance, Myashev v. Bulgaria, no. 43428/02, § 27, 8 January 2009), and ruling on an equitable basis, as required under Article 41, the Court awards Mr Yankov EUR 3, 000 and Mr Manchev EUR 2, 000, plus any tax that may be chargeable.
• EGMR, 12.10.2006 - 49438/99

  STAYKOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 27207/04

  As regards compensatory remedies, the Court has not found it established that under Bulgarian law there exists an avenue allowing the accused to obtain damages or other redress in respect of the excessive length of criminal proceedings against them (see Osmanov and Yuseinov, § 41; Sidjimov, § 42; Nalbantova, § 35; Atanasov and Ovcharov, §§ 59 and 60; and Gavazov, § 166, all cited above; see also Staykov v. Bulgaria, no. 49438/99, § 89 in fine, 12 October 2006).
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 38106/02

  NALBANTOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 27207/04

  The Court has previously found that until 2003 Bulgarian law did not provide remedies allowing those accused in criminal proceedings to expedite the determination of the charges against them (see Osmanov and Yuseinov v. Bulgaria, nos. 54178/00 and 59901/00, §§ 38-40, 23 September 2004; Sidjimov v. Bulgaria, no. 55057/00, § 41, 27 January 2005; Nalbantova v. Bulgaria, no. 38106/02, § 34, 27 September 2007; and Atanasov and Ovcharov v. Bulgaria, no. 61596/00, § 56, 17 January 2008).
• EGMR, 27.01.2005 - 55057/00

  SIDJIMOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 27207/04

  The Court has previously found that until 2003 Bulgarian law did not provide remedies allowing those accused in criminal proceedings to expedite the determination of the charges against them (see Osmanov and Yuseinov v. Bulgaria, nos. 54178/00 and 59901/00, §§ 38-40, 23 September 2004; Sidjimov v. Bulgaria, no. 55057/00, § 41, 27 January 2005; Nalbantova v. Bulgaria, no. 38106/02, § 34, 27 September 2007; and Atanasov and Ovcharov v. Bulgaria, no. 61596/00, § 56, 17 January 2008).
• EGMR, 21.09.2000 - 38081/97

  HOWARTH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 48059/06

  DIMITROV AND HAMANOV v. BULGARIA

  27207/04 and 15614/05, §§ 18 and 24, 22 October 2009; Stefanov and Yurukov v. Bulgaria, no. 25382/04, §§ 4 and 14, 1 April 2010; and Rangelov and Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 23240/04, §§ 5 and 14, 1 April 2010).

  27207/04 and 15614/05, § 32, 22 October 2009; Rumen Georgiev v. Bulgaria, no. 27240/04, § 17, 14 October 2010; Kashavelov v. Bulgaria, no. 891/05, § 51, 20 January 2011; and Makedonski v. Bulgaria, no. 36036/04, § 58, 20 January 2011).

  27207/04 and 15614/05, §§ 17-26, 22 October 2009.

• EGMR, 22.02.2017 - 20484/05

  ARABADZHIEV ET ALEXIEV ET 33 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA BULGARIE

  27207/04+.
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 30943/04

  [FRE]

  The reasonableness of that period must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and having regard to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law: the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities (see, as a recent authority, Yankov and Manchev v. Bulgaria, nos. 27207/04 and 15614/05, § 20, 22 October 2009).

• EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 891/05

  KASHAVELOV v. BULGARIA

  The reasonableness of that period must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and having regard to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law: the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities (see, as a recent authority, Yankov and Manchev v. Bulgaria, nos. 27207/04 and 15614/05, § 20, 22 October 2009).
• EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 16137/04

  [FRE]

  La Cour a toutefois estimé que la notion « d'accusation'peut dans certains cas revêtir la forme d'autres mesures, impliquant un tel reproche et entraînant elles aussi des « répercussions importantes sur la situation'du suspect (Foti et autres c. Italie, 10 décembre 1982, § 52, série A no 56), comme par exemple le fait pour un suspect de donner des dépositions devant un agent de police avant son inculpation formelle (Howarth c. Royaume-Uni, no 38081/97, §§ 8, 9 et 20, 21 septembre 2000 ; Yankov et Manchev c. Bulgarie, nos 27207/04 et 15614/05, §§ 9, 10 et 24, 22 octobre 2009 ; Stefanov et Yurukov c. Bulgarie, no 25382/04, §§ 4, 5 et 14, 1 avril 2010).
• EGMR, 26.07.2012 - 33560/06

  [FRE]

  La Cour a traité à maintes reprises d'affaires soulevant des questions semblables à celle du cas d'espèce et a constaté la violation de l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention en raison des retards injustifiés de la procédure pénale au stade de l'instruction préliminaire (voir Osmanov et Yousseïnov c. Bulgarie, nos 54178/00 et 59901/00, §§ 29 et 30, 23 septembre 2004 ; Myashev c. Bulgarie, no 43428/02, § 16, 8 janvier 2009 ; Yankov et Manchev c. Bulgarie, nos 27207/04 et 15614/05, §§ 21 et 22, 22 octobre 2009).
• EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 20484/05

  ARABADZHIEV AND ALEXIEV v. BULGARIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, among many others, Yankov and Manchev v. Bulgaria, nos. 27207/04 and 15614/05, §§ 17-26, 22 October 2009; and Stefanov and Yurukov v. Bulgaria, no. 25382/04, § 17, 1 April 2010).
• EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 27402/05

  NACHEV v. BULGARIA

  Having regard to these facts and applying the principles set out above, the Court finds that in the present case the applicant's situation was "substantially affected" and he could be considered as subject to a "charge" from the moment when he handed his gun to the police or at the latest from the moment he signed the declaration for his income and possessions (see, with further reference, Yankov and Manchev v. Bulgaria, nos. 27207/04 and 15614/05, §§ 17-18 and §§ 23-24, 22 October 2009).
• EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 4570/05

  YANKOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Having regard to these facts and applying the principles set out above, the Court finds that in the present case the second, third and fourth applicants' situation was "substantially affected" and they could be considered as subject to a "charge" from the moment when they were questioned by the police and confessed to the theft (see, with further reference, Yankov and Manchev v. Bulgaria, nos. 27207/04 and 15614/05, §§ 17-18 and §§ 23-24, 22 October 2009).
• EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 25382/04

  STEFANOV & YURUKOV v. BULGARIA

  27207/04 and 15614/05, §§ 17-18 and §§ 23-24, 22 October 2009).
• EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 16850/04

  KANCHEV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 11486/04

  DINUCCI v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 42953/06

  CHERVENYAKOVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 27240/04

  RUMEN GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 23240/04

  RANGELOV AND STEFANOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 39034/04

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 8930/05

  IVANOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 8919/05

  YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 24572/05

  OGNYANOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 2042/05

  POPOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 27397/05

  IVANOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 43064/05

  ANTONOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 04.05.2010 - 36504/05

  KIRYAKOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 10905/04

  MARIA IVANOVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 30305/13

  SRSEN v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 4551/05

  GEORGIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 30506/04

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 48915/10

  NICULESCU v. ROMANIA