Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OSMANOV AND YUSEINOV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 04.09.2003 - 54178/00
• EGMR, 23.09.2004 - 54178/00, 59901/00

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2004 - 54178/00

  Article 13 therefore offers an alternative: a remedy will be considered "effective" if it can be used either to expedite a decision by the courts dealing with the case, or to provide the accused with adequate redress for delays that have already occurred (see Mifsud v. France (dec.)[GC], no. 57220/00, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 24559/94

  GIBAS c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2004 - 54178/00

  However, the Court considers that the possibility to appeal to the various levels of the prosecution authorities cannot be regarded as an effective remedy because such hierarchical appeals aim to urge the authorities to utilise their discretion and do not give the accused a personal right to compel the State to exercise its supervisory powers (see Gibas v. Poland, no. 24559/94, Commission decision of 6 September 1995, Decisions and Reports 82, p. 76, at p. 82, Kuchar and Stis v. the Czech Republic (dec.), 37527/97, 23 May 2000, Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, §§ 47 and 64, ECHR 2001-VIII and Hartman v. the Czech Republic, no. 53341/99, § 66, ECHR 2003-VIII (extracts)).

• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 48059/06

  DIMITROV AND HAMANOV v. BULGARIA

  In a number of judgments, that Court has noted that before the introduction of Article 239a of the [1974] Code of Criminal Procedure our State did not make available a remedy complying with the requirements of Article 13, read in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and capable of ensuring that the pre-trial phase of criminal proceedings does not exceed a reasonable time [(see Osmanov and Yuseinov v. Bulgaria, nos. 54178/00 and 59901/00, 23 September 2004; Mitev v. Bulgaria, no. 40063/98, 22 December 2004; and Sidjimov v. Bulgaria, no. 55057/00, 27 January 2005)].

  The Court has found in a number of judgments that, apart from the above-mentioned remedy, there are no acceleratory remedies in respect of the length of criminal proceedings in Bulgaria (see Osmanov and Yuseinov v. Bulgaria, nos. 54178/00 and 59901/00, § 38, 23 September 2004; Mitev, cited above, §§ 158-59; Sidjimov, cited above, §§ 40-41; Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 48137/99, § 91, 1 December 2005; Nalbantova v. Bulgaria, no. 38106/02, § 34, 27 September 2007; Karamitrov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 53321/99, § 58, 10 January 2008; Atanasov and Ovcharov, cited above, §§ 56 and 57; Krasimir Yordanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50899/99, § 35, 15 February 2007; Gavazov, cited above, §§ 164-65; Petrov v. Bulgaria, no. 15197/02, § 62, 22 May 2008; Kirov v. Bulgaria, no. 5182/02, § 81, 22 May 2008; Sheremetov, cited above, § 52; Balabanov, cited above, §§ 30 and 32; Myashev, cited above, § 22; Valentin Ivanov v. Bulgaria, no. 76942/01, § 36, 26 March 2009; and Yankov and Manchev, cited above, § 32).

  54178/00 and 59901/00, §§ 23-30, 23 September 2004.

• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 21272/03

  SAKHNOVSKI c. RUSSIE

  En fait, un accusé ne saurait revendiquer la qualité de victime d'une violation de l'article 6 § 3 avant sa condamnation (X c. Royaume-Uni, no 8083/77, décision de la Commission du 13 mars 1980, Décisions et rapports (DR) 19, p. 223 ; EÄŸinlioÄŸlu c. Turquie, no 31312/96, décision de la Commission du 21 octobre 1998, non publiée ; Osmanov et Yousseïnov c. Bulgarie (déc.), nos 54178/00 et 59901/00, 4 septembre 2003, et Witkowski c. Pologne (déc.), no 53804/00, 3 février 2003).
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 66568/09

  KARS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Aussi, les requérants ne peuvent plus se prétendre victimes d'une violation de leur droit à un procès équitable (voir, en ce sens, Stamoulakatos c. Grèce (déc.), no 42155/98, 9 novembre 1999, et Osmanov et Husseinov c. Bulgarie (déc.), nos 54178/00 et 59901/00, 4 septembre 2003).

 
• EGMR, 26.07.2012 - 33560/06

  PETKO YORDANOV c. BULGARIE

  La Cour a traité à maintes reprises d'affaires soulevant des questions semblables à celle du cas d'espèce et a constaté la violation de l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention en raison des retards injustifiés de la procédure pénale au stade de l'instruction préliminaire (voir Osmanov et Yousseïnov c. Bulgarie, nos 54178/00 et 59901/00, §§ 29 et 30, 23 septembre 2004 ; Myashev c. Bulgarie, no 43428/02, § 16, 8 janvier 2009 ; Yankov et Manchev c. Bulgarie, nos 27207/04 et 15614/05, §§ 21 et 22, 22 octobre 2009).
• EGMR, 22.12.2004 - 40063/98

  MITEV v. BULGARIA

  As the Court found in its Osmanov and Yuseinov v. Bulgaria judgment (nos. 54178/00 and 59901/00, §§ 38-42, 23 September 2004) at the relevant time there was no formal remedy under Bulgarian law that could have expedited the determination of the criminal charges against the applicant.
• EGMR, 20.06.2017 - 4751/07

  METIS YAYINCILIK LIMITED SIRKETI ET SÖKMEN c. TURQUIE

  En l'absence de condamnation et donc d'ingérence dans l'exercice par le deuxième requérant de ses droits de la défense invoqués dans les griefs formulés ci-dessus, la Cour rejette-t-elle cette partie de la requête pour défaut manifeste de fondement, en application de l'article 35 §§ 3a) et 4 de la Convention (voir Eginlioglu c. Turquie, no 31312/96, décision de la Commission du 21 octobre 1998, Stamoulakatos c. Grèce (déc.), no 42155/98, 9 novembre 1999, et Osmanov et Husseinov c. Bulgarie (déc.), nos 54178/00 et 59901/00, 4 septembre 2003).
• EGMR, 27.01.2005 - 55057/00

  SIDJIMOV v. BULGARIA

  As the Court found in its Osmanov and Yuseinov v. Bulgaria judgment (nos. 54178/00 and 59901/00, §§ 38-42, 23 September 2004) at the relevant time there was no formal remedy under Bulgarian law that could have expedited the determination of the criminal charges against the applicant.
• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 30506/04

  ENCHO PETKOV v. BULGARIA

  54178/00 and 59901/00, §§ 23-30, 23 September 2004; Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 59913/00, §§ 89-96, 2 February 2006; and Yankov and Manchev v. Bulgaria, nos.