Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 34 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  X. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 34 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (9)

• EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 59696/00

  KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that a person may not claim to be a victim of a violation of his right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the Convention which, according to him, took place in the course of proceedings in which he was acquitted or which were discontinued (see X v. the United Kingdom, no. 8083/77, Commission decision of 13 March 1980, Decisions and Reports 19, p. 223, and EÄ?inlioÄ?lu v. Turkey, no. 31312/96, Commission decision of 21 October 1998).

  In the previous cases the Court acknowledged that an acquitted defendant could no longer claim to be a victim of alleged violations of the Convention during the proceedings (see X. v. the United Kingdom, no. 8083/77, Commission decision of 13 March 1980, DR 19, p. 223).

• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 21272/03

  SAKHNOVSKI c. RUSSIE

  En fait, un accusé ne saurait revendiquer la qualité de victime d'une violation de l'article 6 § 3 avant sa condamnation (X c. Royaume-Uni, no 8083/77, décision de la Commission du 13 mars 1980, Décisions et rapports (DR) 19, p. 223 ; EÄŸinlioÄŸlu c. Turquie, no 31312/96, décision de la Commission du 21 octobre 1998, non publiée ; Osmanov et Yousseïnov c. Bulgarie (déc.), nos 54178/00 et 59901/00, 4 septembre 2003, et Witkowski c. Pologne (déc.), no 53804/00, 3 février 2003).
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 41452/07

  LENEV v. BULGARIA

  According to the Court's and the former Commission's settled case-law, a person may not claim to be a victim of a breach of his or her right to a fair trial that allegedly took place in the course of proceedings in which he or she was acquitted or which were discontinued (see, among other authorities, X v. Austria, no. 5575/72, Commission decision of 8 July 1975, Decisions and Reports (DR) 1, p. 44; X v. the United Kingdom, no. 8083/77, Commission decision of 13 March 1980, DR 19, p. 223; EÄŸinlioÄŸlu v. Turkey, no. 31312/96, Commission decision of 21 October 1998, unreported; Correia de Matos v. Portugal (dec.), no. 48188/99, 15 November 2001, ECHR 2001-XII; Osmanov and Yuseinov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 54178/00, 4 September 2003; I.I. v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 44082/98, 25 March 2004; Oleksy v. Poland (dec.), no. 1379/06, 16 June 2009; G.L. v. Poland (dec.), no. 36714/09, 16 November 2010).

 
• EKMR, 01.07.1992 - 13156/87

  BYRN v. DENMARK

  Likewise the Commission has previously held that an applicant who has sought and gained redress in the national courts may not subsequently any longer claim to be a victim within the meaning of Article 25 of the Convention (cf. No. 5575/72, Dec. 8.7.74, D.R. 1 p. 44 and No. 8083/77, Dec. 13.3.80, D.R. 19 p. 223).
• EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 28475/95

  GRATZER v. AUSTRIA

  Moreover, an acquittal will normally be regarded as rectifying procedural errors alleged to have violated the Convention (No. 5575/72, Dec. 8.7.74, D.R. 1, p. 44; No. 8083/77, Dec. 13.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 223).
• EKMR, 24.02.1997 - 27338/95

  F.S.J. AND 22 OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND

  Moreover, an acquittal will normally be regarded as rectifying procedural errors alleged to have violated the Convention (cf. No. 8083/77, Dec. 13.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 223).
• EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 22120/93

  G.P. v. ITALY

  However, the Commission notes that the applicant was acquitted; it recalls its constant case-law to the effect that an acquitted defendant cannot claim to be a victim of violations of the Conventions which allegedly took place in the course of the proceedings as a result of which he was acquitted (see No. 8083/77, Dec. 13.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 223).
• EKMR, 13.04.1989 - 13004/87

  WILSON ; and OTHERS v. UNITED KINGDOM

  In these circumstances the Commission is of the opinion that any defects which may have existed at the time of the applicants' trial must be considered to have been rectified by the decision of the Court of Appeal (see e.g. No. 8083/77, Dec. 13.3.80, D.R. 19 p. 223).
• EKMR, 01.03.1991 - 13572/88

  OSTERGREN ET AL c. SUEDE

  In such circumstances, the Commission considers that any defects which may have existed in the course of the proceedings against them must be regarded as having been rectified by the acquittal (cf. No. 8083/77, Dec. 13.3.80, D.R. 19 p. 223).