Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OSSEWAARDE v. RUSSIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 14+9-1 - Prohibition of ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  OSSEWAARDE v. RUSSIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 22.04.2013 - 48876/08

  Verbot politischer Fernsehwerbung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 27227/17

  The Government did not explain the rationale behind subjecting missionary work to new formalities (see, by contrast, Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, §§ 110 et passim, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 302/02

  JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 27227/17

  Where however no evidence of coercion or improper pressure has been adduced, the Court has affirmed the applicants' right to engage in individual evangelism and door-to-door preaching (see Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow and Others v. Russia, no. 302/02, § 122, 10 June 2010).
• EGMR, 13.12.2001 - 45701/99

  Metropolitankirche von Bessarabien u.a. ./. Moldawien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 27227/17

  In the same vein, where the exercise of the right to freedom of religion or of one of its aspects is subject under domestic law to a system of prior authorisation, involvement in the procedure for granting authorisation of a recognised ecclesiastical authority cannot be reconciled with the requirements of paragraph 2 of Article 9 (see Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, § 117, ECHR 2001-XII).

• EGMR, 27.03.2018 - 14431/06

  ALEKSANDROV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 27227/17

  However, a sentencing measure which sanctions differently the same offence on account of personal characteristics (or "status") of the offender has been found to give rise to an issue under Article 14 of the Convention (see Paraskeva Todorova v. Bulgaria, no. 37193/07, § 37, 25 March 2010, and Aleksandr Aleksandrov v. Russia, no. 14431/06, § 22, 27 March 2018, in which a violation was found because of a differential sentencing of the applicants on account of, respectively, the ethnic origin and place of residence).
• EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

  Kokkinakis ./. Griechenland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 27227/17

  His preaching had not constituted "a corruption or deformation of true evangelism" (he referred, by contrast, to Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 48, Series A no. 260-A) or any threat of danger to public order.
• EGMR, 01.10.2009 - 76836/01

  Verweigerung der Zuerkennung von Rechtspersönlichkeit an Scientology-Kirchen

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 27227/17

  76836/01 and 32782/03, §§ 51-58 and 82-89, ECHR 2009.
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15

  KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 27227/17

  the decision of the President of the Section to appoint one of the sitting judges of the Court to act as ad hoc judge, applying by analogy Rule 29 § 2 of the Rules of the Court (see, for the similar situation and explanation of the background, Kutayev v. Russia, no. 17912/15, §§ 4-8, 24 January 2023);.
• EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 10810/15

  SMADIKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 27227/17

  After that date, recourse to the review procedure under the CAO was not subject to any time-limit and did not constitute a remedy to be exhausted (he referred to Smadikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 10810/15, 31 January 2017).
• EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 42911/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 27227/17

  The Government submitted that the application was inadmissible for non-exhaustion of the effective domestic remedies because the applicant had not filed an application for review with the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (they referred to Orlovskaya Iskra v. Russia, no. 42911/08, § 79, 21 February 2017).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.03.2025 - 39776/15

  KOLYASNIKOV v. RUSSIA

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023 (unjustified restrictions on missionary work).

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023.

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023.

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023.

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023.

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023.

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023.

• EGMR - 4513/18 (anhängig)

  TUGUZHEKOV v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023 (unjustified restrictions on missionary work).

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023 (unjustified restrictions on missionary work).

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023 (unjustified restrictions on missionary work).

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023 (unjustified restrictions on missionary work).

  Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023 (unjustified restrictions on missionary work).

• EGMR, 09.07.2026 - 31582/20

  BARSUK AND GYL v. UKRAINE

  The Court has already held that Article 9 of the Convention applies to activities of this kind, that is, imparting information about a particular set of beliefs to others who do not hold them (see Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, § 39, 7 March 2023, and Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, §§ 31 and 36, Series A no. 260-A).

• EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17

  BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN and 2 other applications

  In that connection, the Court notes that it is apparent that in so far as the restrictions did not regulate the content of the religious expression or the manner of its delivery, they were not fit to protect society from religious extremism or any other forms of intolerance (compare Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, § 45, 7 March 2023).
• EGMR, 08.07.2025 - 81028/17

  RAFIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  To accept the contrary would amount to the exclusion of minority religious beliefs which are not formally registered with the State, and consequently would amount to admitting that a State can dictate what a person can or cannot believe (see Masaev v. Moldova, no. 6303/05, § 26, 12 May 2009, and Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, § 46, 7 March 2023).
• EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 2134/23

  PIVKINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In the cases where all acts and judicial decisions leading to the alleged Convention violations occurred up until the termination date, the Court determined that it had jurisdiction to deal with them (see, among others, Fedotova and Others, cited above, § 73; Svetova and Others v. Russia, no. 54714/17, § 28, 24 January 2023; Kogan and Others v. Russia, no. 54003/20, § 49, 7 March 2023; and Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, § 28, 7 March 2023).
• EGMR, 09.06.2026 - 56007/21

  VELEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  L'association ADF International déduit de la jurisprudence de la Cour (Kokkinakis c. Grèce, 25 mai 1993, série A no 260-A, Ossewaarde c. Russie, no 27227/17, 7 mars 2023, Les témoins de Jéhovah de Moscou et autres c. Russie, no 302/02, 10 juin 2010) et des travaux d'autres organes internationaux de protection des droits de l'homme (la Commission de Venise du Conseil de l'Europe et le Comité des droits de l'homme des Nations Unies) que les activités missionnaires, telles que la prédication de porte-à-porte, bénéficient au nom du respect de la liberté religieuse et de la liberté d'expression d'une protection particulière contre les immixtions des autorités publiques.
• EGMR, 13.05.2026 - 11890/21

  ASHYROV AND SKOKOV v. RUSSIA

  Rn. 11 In the leading case of Ossewaarde v. Russia (no. 27227/17, 7 March 2023), the Court found that the Russian Government had failed to justify the newly introduced restrictions on missionary work.
• EGMR, 06.02.2024 - 43082/14

  HAMZAYAN v. ARMENIA

  The act of imparting information about a particular set of beliefs to others who do not hold those beliefs - known as missionary work or evangelism in Christianity - is protected under Article 9 alongside other acts of worship, such as the collective study and discussion of religious texts, which are aspects of the practice of a religion or belief in a generally recognised form (see Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, § 39, 7 March 2023, with further references).
• EGMR - 39038/21 (anhängig)

  PLATT v. TÜRKİYE and 2 other applications

  In their exercise of the freedoms protected under Article 9 of the Convention, were the applicants victims of discrimination on grounds of their religion, in breach of Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 9 (see, mutatis mutandis, Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia and Frolov v. Russia, no. 37477/11, §§ 35-44, 23 November 2021, and Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, §§ 48-57, 7 March 2023)?.
• EGMR - 37814/21 (anhängig)

  WILSON v. TÜRKİYE and 19 other applications
• EGMR - 54264/17 (anhängig)

  MANI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 7949/18 (anhängig)

  MANDRICHENKO v. RUSSIA and 1 other application