Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 28680/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,60627) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 13 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 28680/06
- EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 28680/06
- EGMR, 08.03.2012 - 28680/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88
Jens Söring
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 28680/06
The Court's case-law establishes that Article 3, which prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment cannot be relied on where distress and anguish, however deep, flows, inevitably, from the measures which are otherwise compatible with the Convention, unless there is a special element which causes the suffering to go beyond that inherent in their implementation (see, mutatis mutandis, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, p. 15, § 30; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 39, § 100; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX). - EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 28680/06
The Court's case-law establishes that Article 3, which prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment cannot be relied on where distress and anguish, however deep, flows, inevitably, from the measures which are otherwise compatible with the Convention, unless there is a special element which causes the suffering to go beyond that inherent in their implementation (see, mutatis mutandis, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, p. 15, § 30; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 39, § 100; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX). - EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94
Mord an James Bulger
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 28680/06
The Court's case-law establishes that Article 3, which prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment cannot be relied on where distress and anguish, however deep, flows, inevitably, from the measures which are otherwise compatible with the Convention, unless there is a special element which causes the suffering to go beyond that inherent in their implementation (see, mutatis mutandis, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, p. 15, § 30; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 39, § 100; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX). - EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 28945/95
T.P. ET K.M. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 28680/06
The local authority complaints mechanism and local government ombudsman had already been found by the Court not to be effective remedies in these circumstances (T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28945/95, ECHR 2001-V (extracts)).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.03.2012 - 28680/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,91423) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A.D. ET O.D. CONTRE LE ROYAUME-UNI
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A.D. AND O.D. AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 28680/06
- EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 28680/06
- EGMR, 08.03.2012 - 28680/06
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 28680/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64666) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 28680/06
- EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 28680/06
- EGMR, 08.03.2012 - 28680/06
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 28680/06
The Court reiterates that it is not normally within its province to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts because, as a general rule, it is for the domestic courts to assess the evidence before them (see, inter alia, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, p. 12, § 34 and Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, §§ 33-34). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 28680/06
The Court reiterates that it is not normally within its province to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts because, as a general rule, it is for the domestic courts to assess the evidence before them (see, inter alia, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, p. 12, § 34 and Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, §§ 33-34).
- EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 23284/04
BORIS POPOV v. RUSSIA
It was not suggested that he failed to comply with any formal or procedural requirements (see Francisco v. France (dec.), no. 38945/97, 29 August 2000; see also, mutatis mutandis, T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28945/95, §§ 107-110, ECHR 2001-V (extracts), and A.D. and O.D. v. the United Kingdom, no. 28680/06, §§ 102-104, 16 March 2010).