Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  McINTYRE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 2, Art. 14, Art. 34, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. d MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

  Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1998 - 29046/95

  For the purposes of Article 14 of the Convention, a difference of treatment is discriminatory if it "has no objective and reasonable justification", that is, if it does not pursue a "legitimate aim" or if there is not a "reasonable relationship" of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised (see, inter alia, Eur. Court HR, Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 16, para. 33).
• EGMR, 04.12.1989 - 14688/89

  SIMPSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1998 - 29046/95

  The Commission has more recently recognised "that there must be a wide measure of discretion left to the appropriate authorities as to how to make the best use possible of the resources available to them in the interests of disabled children generally" (see No. 14688/89, Dec. 4.12.89, D.R. 64, p. 194 and No. 28915/95, Dec. 17.1.97, unpublished).
• EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 28915/95

  S.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1998 - 29046/95

  The Commission has more recently recognised "that there must be a wide measure of discretion left to the appropriate authorities as to how to make the best use possible of the resources available to them in the interests of disabled children generally" (see No. 14688/89, Dec. 4.12.89, D.R. 64, p. 194 and No. 28915/95, Dec. 17.1.97, unpublished).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 51500/08

  ÇAM c. TURQUIE

  Elles ne cherchèrent pas non plus à envisager des aménagements pour pourvoir aux besoins pédagogiques spécifiques que la cécité de la requérante pouvait requérir (comparer McIntyre c. Royaume-Uni, no 29046/95, décision de la Commission du 21 octobre 1998, non publiée).
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 289/14

  STOIAN v. ROMANIA

  Relying on McIntyre v. the United Kingdom (no. 29046/95, Commission decision of 21 October 1998, unreported) and Groza v. Romania ((dec.), no. 31017/05, 21 February 2012), the Government argued that the measures taken by the authorities were proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued.
• EGMR, 31.05.2022 - 23077/19

  ARNAR HELGI LARUSSON v. ICELAND

  The Commission has addressed accessibility issues in the context of the right to education (see McIntyre v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 29046/95, 21 October 1998), and the Court has in a similar vein addressed issues relating to accommodation for people with disabilities in education (see Enver Sahin v. Turkey, no. 23065/12, 30 January 2018; G.L. v. Italy, no. 59751/15, 10 September 2020; and Çam v. Turkey, no. 51500/08, 23 February 2016).