Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ANNAGI HAJIBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN

  Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 37-1 - Striking out applications);Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election);Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ANNAGI HAJIBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (36)Zitiert selbst (13)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11

  The Court has examined a number of cases concerning searches of lawyers' offices under Article 8 of the Convention, finding that such searches amount to an interference with the lawyer's "private life", "home", and "correspondence" (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, §§ 29-33, Series A no. 251-B; Tamosius v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62002/00, ECHR 2002-VIII; Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no. 50882/99, §§ 70-72, 27 September 2005; Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, §§ 43-45, ECHR 2007-IV; and Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, § 212, 22 December 2008).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11

  Whether or not contacts between the authorities and an applicant are tantamount to unacceptable practices from the standpoint of Article 34 must be determined in the light of the particular circumstances of the case (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 130, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 22.05.2008 - 65755/01

  ILIYA STEFANOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11

  In cases where search warrants at issue were formulated in excessively broad terms, lacking any reservation in respect of privileged documents and giving the prosecution unrestricted discretion in determining which documents to seize, the Court has found that the lawyer's rights under Article 8 of the Convention had been breached on that ground (see Aleksanyan, cited above, §§ 216-18; Smirnov v. Russia, no. 71362/01, §§ 47-49, 7 June 2007; and Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 65755/01, §§ 41-42, 22 May 2008).

• EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11

  The Contracting Party's procedural obligation must be enforced irrespective of the eventual outcome of the proceedings and in such a manner as to avoid any actual or potential chilling effect on the applicants or their representatives (see Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, § 209, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 22.12.2008 - 46468/06

  ALEKSANYAN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11

  The Court has examined a number of cases concerning searches of lawyers' offices under Article 8 of the Convention, finding that such searches amount to an interference with the lawyer's "private life", "home", and "correspondence" (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, §§ 29-33, Series A no. 251-B; Tamosius v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62002/00, ECHR 2002-VIII; Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no. 50882/99, §§ 70-72, 27 September 2005; Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, §§ 43-45, ECHR 2007-IV; and Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, § 212, 22 December 2008).
• EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 50882/99

  PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11

  The Court has examined a number of cases concerning searches of lawyers' offices under Article 8 of the Convention, finding that such searches amount to an interference with the lawyer's "private life", "home", and "correspondence" (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, §§ 29-33, Series A no. 251-B; Tamosius v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62002/00, ECHR 2002-VIII; Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no. 50882/99, §§ 70-72, 27 September 2005; Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, §§ 43-45, ECHR 2007-IV; and Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, § 212, 22 December 2008).
• EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 25091/94

  SAHiN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11

  Therefore, searches of lawyers' premises should be subject to especially strict scrutiny (see Elçi and Others v. Turkey, nos. 23145/93 and 25091/94, § 669, 13 November 2003).
• EGMR, 19.09.2002 - 62002/00

  TAMOSIUS contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11

  The Court has examined a number of cases concerning searches of lawyers' offices under Article 8 of the Convention, finding that such searches amount to an interference with the lawyer's "private life", "home", and "correspondence" (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, §§ 29-33, Series A no. 251-B; Tamosius v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62002/00, ECHR 2002-VIII; Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no. 50882/99, §§ 70-72, 27 September 2005; Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, §§ 43-45, ECHR 2007-IV; and Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, § 212, 22 December 2008).
• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  INTIGAM ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11

  The circumstances relating to Mr Aliyev's arrest and detention are the subject of a separate application brought by him before the Court (application no. 68762/14).
• EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 18705/06

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11

  The Court considers that this complaint falls to be examined only under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and that no separate examination is necessary under Article 13 (compare Namat Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 18705/06, § 57, 8 April 2010).
• EGMR, 11.06.2015 - 31953/11

  TAHIROV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 16.06.2016 - 30362/11

  SOLTANOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 09.12.2010 - 4741/06

  [ENG]

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.04.2022 - 32734/11

  FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 21-28, 22 October 2015).

  The submissions on this complaint made by the applicant and the Government were similar to those made by the parties in respect of the same complaint raised in the case of Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 57-60, 22 October 2015).

• EGMR, 02.12.2021 - 64733/09

  ELECTION MONITORING CENTRE AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 21-28, 22 October 2015).

  The submissions made by the applicants and the Government were similar to those made by the parties in respect of the same complaint raised in the case of Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 57-60, 22 October 2015).

• EGMR, 20.05.2021 - 46930/10

  MEHMAN ALIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 21-28, 22 October 2015).

  The submissions made by the applicants and the Government were similar to those made by the parties in respect of the same complaint raised in the case of Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 57-60, 22 October 2015).

• EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11

  ABDALOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 21-28, 22 October 2015).

  Having studied the terms of the Government's unilateral declaration, the Court considers - for the reasons stated in Tahirov v. Azerbaijan (no. 31953/11, §§ 32-42, 11 June 2015) and Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 30-40, 22 October 2015), which are equally applicable to the present case and from which the Court sees no reason to deviate - that the proposed declaration does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the present application.

• EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 7218/13

  MAJIDLI v. AZERBAIJAN and 2 other applications

  The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 21-28, 22 October 2015).

  The submissions made by the applicant and the Government were identical to those made by the parties in respect of the same complaint raised in the case of Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 57-60, 22 October 2015).

• EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 12098/09

  SALMANOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 21-28, 22 October 2015).

  The submissions made by the applicant and the Government were similar to those made by the parties in respect of the same complaint raised in the case of Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 57-60, 22 October 2015).

• EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 36821/11

  SAMADBAYLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 21-28, 22 October 2015).

  Having studied the terms of the Government's unilateral declarations, the Court considers - for the reasons stated in Tahirov v. Azerbaijan (no. 31953/11, §§ 32-42, 11 June 2015) and Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 30-40, 22 October 2015), which are equally applicable to the present cases and from which the Court sees no reason to deviate - that the proposed declarations do not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the present applications.

• EGMR, 27.10.2016 - 37614/11

  SHUKUROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 21-28, 22 October 2015).

  The submissions made by the applicant, the Government and the third party, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), were identical to those made by the relevant parties in respect of the same complaint raised in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 57-63, 22 October 2015).

• EGMR, 05.12.2019 - 8513/11

  ABIL v. AZERBAIJAN (No.2)

  The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 21-28, 22 October 2015).

  Having studied the terms of the Government's unilateral declaration, the Court considers - for the reasons stated in Tahirov v. Azerbaijan (no. 31953/11, §§ 34-42, 11 June 2015) and Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 33-40, 22 October 2015), which are equally applicable to the present case and from which the Court sees no reason to deviate - that the proposed declaration does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the present application.

• EGMR, 16.12.2021 - 52482/10

  ASGAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 21-28, 22 October 2015).

  The submissions made by the applicant and the Government were similar to those made by the parties in respect of the same complaint raised in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 57-60, 22 October 2015).

• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  INTIGAM ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16

  HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 13.12.2018 - 66650/13

  MURSALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN and 10 other applications
• EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 39919/07

  ELCHIN HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 04.02.2025 - 66345/12

  SALAMOVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 23.02.2023 - 73088/13

  MAHMUDOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 34528/13

  MAHADDINOVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 67374/11

  YAGUBLU v. AZERBAIJAN and 2 other applications
• EGMR, 26.09.2019 - 56317/11

  MAHAMMAD MAJIDLI v. AZERBAIJAN and 3 other applications
• EGMR, 16.06.2016 - 30362/11

  SOLTANOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 11.12.2025 - 54829/12

  VINOGRADOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications
• EGMR, 19.09.2019 - 7268/10

  HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 29.06.2017 - 44699/13

  HAJILI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 09.12.2025 - 29550/14

  MIRAGAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 29.06.2023 - 38228/12

  LALAZAR MAMMADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 12.01.2023 - 70981/11

  ELECTION MONITORING AND DEMOCRACY EDUCATION CENTRE AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 13731/12

  ALIBEYOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 2326/11

  MAMMADLI v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 07.10.2025 - 54572/13

  SADIGOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 24.10.2024 - 43164/10

  BABALI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 23.02.2023 - 79522/13

  BAYRAMOV AND IMANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 15996/12

  HAJIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 16.06.2016 - 29781/11

  GAYA ALIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 31793/10

  HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 13 other applications
• EGMR, 28.09.2017 - 69180/11

  HAJIBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN and 3 other applications
• EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 20411/11

  ASLAN ISMAYILOV v. AZERBAIJAN