Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHARIFI v. DENMARK

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Expulsion;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SHARIFI v. DENMARK

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (16)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 77036/11

  SALEM v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21

  The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion have been set out in detail in, for example, Munir Johana v. Denmark (no. 56803/18, §§ 23-26, 12 January 2021) and Salem v. Denmark (no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016).

  Rn. 24 The Court considers it established that there was an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private life within the meaning of Article 8, that the expulsion order and the re-entry ban were "in accordance with the law" and that they pursued the legitimate aim of preventing disorder and crime (see also, for example, Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, § 61, 1 December 2016).

• EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 40601/05

  Rechtssache M. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21

  One of the elements relied on in this respect has been whether the offence leading to the expulsion order was of such a nature that the person in question posed a serious threat to public order (see, among other authorities, Ezzouhdi v. France, no. 47160/99, § 34 13 February 2001; Keles v. Germany, no. 32231/02, § 59, 27 October 2005; and Bousarra v. France, no. 25672/07, § 53, 23 September 2010, in which the Court found that the persons in question did not pose a serious threat to public order; see also Mutlag v. Germany, no. 40601/05, §§ 61-62, 25 March 2010, and Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, § 49, 10 April 2012, in which the Court found that the person in question did pose a serious threat to public order).
• EGMR, 27.10.2005 - 32231/02

  Ausweisung, Schutz von Ehe und Familie, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21

  One of the elements relied on in this respect has been whether the offence leading to the expulsion order was of such a nature that the person in question posed a serious threat to public order (see, among other authorities, Ezzouhdi v. France, no. 47160/99, § 34 13 February 2001; Keles v. Germany, no. 32231/02, § 59, 27 October 2005; and Bousarra v. France, no. 25672/07, § 53, 23 September 2010, in which the Court found that the persons in question did not pose a serious threat to public order; see also Mutlag v. Germany, no. 40601/05, §§ 61-62, 25 March 2010, and Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, § 49, 10 April 2012, in which the Court found that the person in question did pose a serious threat to public order).

• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 60286/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21

  One of the elements relied on in this respect has been whether the offence leading to the expulsion order was of such a nature that the person in question posed a serious threat to public order (see, among other authorities, Ezzouhdi v. France, no. 47160/99, § 34 13 February 2001; Keles v. Germany, no. 32231/02, § 59, 27 October 2005; and Bousarra v. France, no. 25672/07, § 53, 23 September 2010, in which the Court found that the persons in question did not pose a serious threat to public order; see also Mutlag v. Germany, no. 40601/05, §§ 61-62, 25 March 2010, and Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, § 49, 10 April 2012, in which the Court found that the person in question did pose a serious threat to public order).
• EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 56803/18

  MUNIR JOHANA v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21

  The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion have been set out in detail in, for example, Munir Johana v. Denmark (no. 56803/18, §§ 23-26, 12 January 2021) and Salem v. Denmark (no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016).
• EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 41643/19

  ABDI v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21

  The offence was of such a nature that it could have had serious consequences for the lives of others (see, for example, Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, § 33, 14 September 2021, and the cases cited therein).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VG Berlin, 27.09.2023 - 38 K 678.21

  Visumserteilung zum Familiennachzug: Feststellung des Bestehens einer Ehe durch …

  Zu berücksichtigen sei überdies, ob das Familienleben zu einer Zeit begründet wurde, zu der den beteiligten Personen bekannt war, dass die Aufnahme wegen des Aufenthaltsstatus des Stammberechtigten von Beginn an unsicher war (BVerwG…, Urteil vom 27. April 2021 - BVerwG 1 C 45/20 -, NVwZ-RR 2021, 777 [778] Rn. 18 m. w. N.; jüngst EGMR, Entscheidung vom 5. September 2023 - 31434/21 [Sharifi v. Denmark] -, abrufbar unter https://laweuro.com/?p=21042, Rn. 31).
• VG Berlin, 27.09.2023 - 38 K 618.21

  Visumserteilung zum Zwecke des Familiennachzugs: Voraussetzungen eines …

  Zu berücksichtigen sei überdies, ob das Familienleben zu einer Zeit begründet wurde, zu der den beteiligten Personen bekannt war, dass die Aufnahme wegen des Aufenthaltsstatus des Stammberechtigten von Beginn an unsicher war (BVerwG…, Urteil vom 27. April 2021 - BVerwG 1 C 45.20 -, NVwZ-RR 2021, 777 [778] Rn. 18 m. w. N.; jüngst EGMR, Entscheidung vom 5. September 2023 - 31434/21 [Sharifi v. Denmark] -, abrufbar unter https://laweuro.com/?p=21042, Rn. 31).
• EGMR, 12.11.2024 - 5199/23

  SHARAFANE v. DENMARK

  The Court is therefore called upon to examine whether "very serious reasons" of that kind were adequately adduced and examined by the national authorities when they assessed the applicant's case (see, also, Sarac v. Denmark, no. 19866/21, § 27, 9 April 2024; Nguyen v. Denmark, no. 2116/21, § 28, 9 April 2024; Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, § 25, 5 September 2023; and Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, § 25, 5 September 2023).

• EGMR, 12.11.2024 - 14171/23

  AL-HABEEB v. DENMARK

  The Court is therefore called upon to examine whether "very serious reasons" of that kind were adequately adduced and examined by the national authorities when they assessed the applicant's case (see also Sarac v. Denmark, no. 19866/21, § 27, 9 April 2024; Nguyen v. Denmark, no. 2116/21, § 28, 9 April 2024; Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, § 25, 5 September 2023; and Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, § 25, 5 September 2023).
• VG Berlin, 27.09.2023 - 38 K 897.21

  Visumserteilung zum Familiennachzug: Ausnahme von dem Regelausschlussgrund bei …

  Zu berücksichtigen sei überdies, ob das Familienleben zu einer Zeit begründet wurde, zu der den beteiligten Personen bekannt war, dass die Aufnahme wegen des Aufenthaltsstatus des Stammberechtigten von Beginn an unsicher war (BVerwG…, Urteil vom 27. April 2021 - BVerwG 1 C 45.20 - NVwZ-RR 2021, 777 [778] Rn. 18 m.w.N.; jüngst EGMR, Entscheidung vom 5. September 2023 - 31434/21 [Sharifi v. Denmark] -, abrufbar unter https://laweuro.com/?p=21042, Rn. 31).
• EGMR, 12.11.2024 - 3645/23

  SAVURAN v. DENMARK

  The Court is therefore called upon to examine whether "very serious reasons" of that kind were adequately adduced and examined by the national authorities when assessing the applicant's case (see also, Sarac v. Denmark, no. 19866/21, § 27, 9 April 2024; Nguyen v. Denmark, no. 2116/21, § 28, 9 April 2024; Noorzae, cited above, § 25, and Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, § 25, 5 September 2023).
• EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 19866/21

  SARAC v. DENMARK

  The Court is therefore called upon to examine whether "very serious reasons" of that kind were adequately adduced and examined by the national authorities when assessing the applicant's case (see Noorzae, cited above, § 25 and Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, § 25, 5 September 2023).
• EGMR, 19.03.2026 - 15860/22

  HUSSAIN v. DENMARK

  Rn. 7 The Court also notes the numerous cases against Denmark concerning the expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among other authorities, Miari v. Denmark, no. 2852/24, 15 July 2025; Sharafane v. Denmark, no. 5199/23, 12 November 2024; Al-Habeeb v. Denmark, no. 14171/23, 12 November 2024; Savuran v. Denmark, no. 3645/23, 12 November 2024; Winther v. Denmark, no. 9588/21, 12 November 2024; Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; and Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021), and concerning the expulsion of immigrants who entered the country as adults (see, for example, Assem Hassan Ali v. Denmark, no. 25593/14, 23 October 2018; Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, 1 December 2016; Hamesevic v. Denmark (dec.), no. 25748/15, 16 May 2017; Lagergren v. Denmark (dec.), no. 18668/03, 16 October 2006; and Bajrami v. Denmark (dec.) [Committee], no. 24379/20, 22 February 2022).
• EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 2116/21

  NGUYEN v. DENMARK

  The Court is therefore called upon to examine whether "very serious reasons" of that kind were adequately adduced and examined by the national authorities when assessing the applicant's case (see Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, § 25, 5 September 2023, and Sharifi v. Denmark, no.31434/21, § 2, 5 September 2023).
• EGMR, 12.11.2024 - 9588/21

  WINTHER v. DENMARK

  Rn. 38 With regard to the criterion of "the length of the applicant's stay in the country from which he or she is to be expelled", the Supreme Court duly took into account the fact that the applicant had entered Denmark as a 20-year-old adult, and that he had lawfully resided there for less than four years when the offences were committed (see, also mutatis mutandis, Sarac v. Denmark, no. 19866/21, § 30, 9 April 2024; Nguyen v. Denmark, no. 2116/21, § 30, 9 April 2024; Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, § 28, 5 September 2023; and Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, § 28, 5 September 2023).
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 21783/22

  CAKMAK v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 32739/21

  PAYAM v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 54157/21

  KURLAND v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 60766/19

  FATEH v. DENMARK and 1 other application
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 61126/19

  BELGACEM v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 11093/22

  DAVUD KIBAR v. DENMARK