Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HUSSAIN v. DENMARK

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 7841/14

  LEVAKOVIC v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 31572/19

  In addition, he had consistently demonstrated a lack of will to comply with Danish law, despite the fact that a suspended expulsion order had been issued against him in June 2016 (see, also, among others, Khan v. Denmark, cited above, § 73 and Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841/14, § 44, 23 October 2018).

  The Court points out in that regard that, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, although opinions may differ on the outcome of a judgment, "where the balancing exercise has been undertaken by the national authorities in conformity with the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts" (see, among many others, Ndidi v. the United Kingdom, no. 41215/14, § 76, 14 September 2017 and Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841/14, § 45, 23 October 2018).

• EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 40601/05

  Rechtssache M. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 31572/19

  In the present case, however, the Court does not call into question that the applicant's crimes leading to the expulsion order were of such a nature that he posed a serious threat to public order (see also, inter alia, Mutlag v Germany, no. 40601/05, §§ 61-62, 25 March 2010, and Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, § 53, 10 April 2012).
• EGMR, 27.10.2005 - 32231/02

  Ausweisung, Schutz von Ehe und Familie, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 31572/19

  Thus in, for example, Ezzouhdi v. France, no. 47160/99, § 34 13 February 2001, Keles v. Germany, no. 32231/02, § 66, 27 October 2005 and Bousarra v. France, no. 25672/07, § 53, 23 September 2010, given the specific circumstances in each case, the Court found the imposition of a definitive expulsion order to be in breach of Article 8 of the Convention.

 
• EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 41215/14

  NDIDI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 31572/19

  The Court points out in that regard that, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, although opinions may differ on the outcome of a judgment, "where the balancing exercise has been undertaken by the national authorities in conformity with the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts" (see, among many others, Ndidi v. the United Kingdom, no. 41215/14, § 76, 14 September 2017 and Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841/14, § 45, 23 October 2018).
• EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 77036/11

  SALEM v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 31572/19

  Relevant domestic law 18. The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion have been set out in detail, for example in Munir Johana v. Denmark (no. 56803/18, §§ 22-26, 12 January 2021) and Salem v. Denmark, (no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016).
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 60286/09

  BALOGUN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 31572/19

  In the present case, however, the Court does not call into question that the applicant's crimes leading to the expulsion order were of such a nature that he posed a serious threat to public order (see also, inter alia, Mutlag v Germany, no. 40601/05, §§ 61-62, 25 March 2010, and Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, § 53, 10 April 2012).
• EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 56803/18

  MUNIR JOHANA v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 31572/19

  Relevant domestic law 18. The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion have been set out in detail, for example in Munir Johana v. Denmark (no. 56803/18, §§ 22-26, 12 January 2021) and Salem v. Denmark, (no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016).
• EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 41643/19

  ABDI v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 31572/19

  Therefore, the Supreme Court could rightly assume that the applicant did not have a "family life" in Denmark, and deal only with the "private life" aspect (see also Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, § 31, 14 September 2021 [not final yet] and Mohammad v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no 16711/15, § 26, 20 November 2018).
• EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 26957/19

  KHAN v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 31572/19

  The Court finds reason to add that the crimes committed by the applicant, including the final ones leading to the unconditional expulsion order, were such as to have serious consequences for the lives of others (see, for example, Khan v. Denmark, no. 26957/19, § 72, 12 January 2021; Samsonnikov v. Estonia, no. 52178/10, § 89, 3 July 2012; and Salem v. Denmark, cited above, § 66).
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 16711/15

  MOHAMMAD v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 31572/19

  Therefore, the Supreme Court could rightly assume that the applicant did not have a "family life" in Denmark, and deal only with the "private life" aspect (see also Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, § 31, 14 September 2021 [not final yet] and Mohammad v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no 16711/15, § 26, 20 November 2018).
• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 52178/10

  SAMSONNIKOV v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 58363/10

  M.E. v. DENMARK

• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 32739/21

  PAYAM v. DENMARK

  It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 54157/21

  KURLAND v. DENMARK

  It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 11093/22

  DAVUD KIBAR v. DENMARK

  It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).

 
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 21783/22

  CAKMAK v. DENMARK

  It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 60766/19

  FATEH v. DENMARK

  It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 61126/19

  BELGACEM v. DENMARK

  It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).