Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MICHAEL THEODOSSIOU LTD. v. CYPRUS

  Art. 41 MRK
  Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction) (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04
• EGMR, 14.04.2015 - 31811/04
• EGMR, 03.02.2016 - 31811/04

Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MICHAEL THEODOSSIOU LTD. v. CYPRUS

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04
• EGMR, 14.04.2015 - 31811/04
• EGMR, 03.02.2016 - 31811/04

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (11)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04

  The principle of lawfulness also presupposes that the applicable provisions of domestic law be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in their application (see, among other authorities, Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, § 42, Series A no. 296-A, and Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, § 110, Series A no. 102).
• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04

  Nevertheless, in the exercise of its power of review, the Court must determine whether the requisite balance was maintained in a manner consonant with the applicant company's right of property (see, mutatis mutandis, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 69, Series A no. 52).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 22774/93

  IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04

  The Court will generally respect the domestic authorities" judgment as to what is in the general interest unless that judgment is manifestly without reasonable foundation (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 49, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88

  HENTRICH v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04

  The principle of lawfulness also presupposes that the applicable provisions of domestic law be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in their application (see, among other authorities, Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, § 42, Series A no. 296-A, and Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, § 110, Series A no. 102).
• EGMR, 28.04.2004 - 56679/00

  AZINAS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04

  Relying on Azinas v. Cyprus ([GC], no. 56679/00, ECHR 2004-III), they contended that the Convention formed an integral part of the Cyprus legal system and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 was directly applicable in Cyprus.
• EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 72203/01

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04

  In this connection the Court reiterates that it is in the first place for the domestic authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC] nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, § 86, ECHR 2005 - ).
• EGMR, 03.12.2020 - 37710/97

  ELIA SRL AGAINST ITALY AND 2 OTHER CASES

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04

  Under the system of protection established by the Convention, it is thus for the national authorities to make the initial assessment as to the existence of public concern warranting measures interfering with the peaceful enjoyment of possessions (see Terazzi S.r.l. v. Italy, 17 October 2002, § 85, and Elia S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 37710/97, § 77, ECHR 2001-IX).
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 19.07.2007 - 15/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04

  15/04/2009.
• RG, 13.11.1889 - I 229/89

  Kontokorrentvertrag. Genossenschaft.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 31811/04

  On 30 March 1989 the applicant company lodged application for judicial review no. 229/89 contesting the municipality's failure to reply.
• EuGH, 14.12.1962 - 21/62

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen