Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HADJI v. MOLDOVA

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (12)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 12066/02

  CIORAP CONTRE LA RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET 26 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 32844/07

  The Court reiterates the general principles concerning conditions of detention set out in Ostrovar v. Moldova (no. 35207/03, §§ 76-79, 13 September 2005).
• EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 47203/06

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 32844/07

  In so far as the latter objection is concerned, the Court notes that a similar objection was examined and dismissed by the Court in I.D. v. Moldova (no. 47203/06, §§ 34-35, 30 November 2010) because the Government had not shown that an effective remedy had been available in theory and in practice.
• EKMR, 06.07.1988 - 12015/86

  HILTON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 32844/07

  The concept of a "continuing situation" refers to a state of affairs which operates by continuous activities by or on the part of the State so as to render the applicant a victim (see Montion v. France, no. 11192/84, Commission decision of 14 May 1987, DR 52, p. 227; and Hilton v. the United Kingdom, no. 12015/86, Commission decision of 6 July 1988, DR 57, p. 108).

• EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 15868/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 32844/07

  Nonetheless, in view of the significant gap between the two periods of detention with which the complaints are concerned, the Court cannot treat them as a part of a continuing situation as described above, even if the other conditions are met (see Haritonov v. Moldova, no. 15868/07, § 26, 5 July 2011).
• EKMR, 14.05.1987 - 11192/84

  MONTION contre la France

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 32844/07

  The concept of a "continuing situation" refers to a state of affairs which operates by continuous activities by or on the part of the State so as to render the applicant a victim (see Montion v. France, no. 11192/84, Commission decision of 14 May 1987, DR 52, p. 227; and Hilton v. the United Kingdom, no. 12015/86, Commission decision of 6 July 1988, DR 57, p. 108).
• EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 10809/06

  TURCAN v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 32844/07

  The Court observes that in Å¢urcan v. Moldova, no. 10809/06, §§ 35-39, 27 November 2007, it found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the poor conditions of the applicant's detention in Prison no. 13 between February and September 2006.
• EKMR, 13.10.1986 - 9303/81

  B. and D. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 32844/07

  In cases where there is a continuing situation, the six-month period runs from the cessation of the situation (see B. and D. v. the United Kingdom, no. 9303/81, Commission decision of 13 October 1986, Decisions and Reports (DR) 49, p. 44).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 11353/06

  [FRE]

  Elle a pu ainsi observer une série de problèmes récurrents au sujet des prisons de ce pays, dont la surpopulation, le manque d'hygiène et de conditions matérielles appropriées, la mauvaise qualité et la quantité insuffisante de la nourriture, et l'absence de soins médicaux adéquats (voir, parmi d'autres, Becciev c. Moldova, no 9190/03, §§ 41-48, 4 octobre 2005, Holomiov, précité, §§ 113-122, Istratii, précité, §§ 48-59 et 68-72, Modarca, précité, §§ 63-69, Ciorap c. Moldova, no 12066/02, §§ 65-71, 19 juin 2007, Popovici c. Moldova, nos 289/04 et 41194/04, §§ 56-57, 27 novembre 2007, Turcan c. Moldova, no 10809/06, §§ 35-39, 27 novembre 2007, Malai c. Moldova, no 7101/06, §§ 33-35, 13 novembre 2008, Valeriu et Nicolae Rosca c. Moldova, no 41704/02, §§ 78-79, 20 octobre 2009, Gavrilovici c. Moldova, no 25464/05, §§ 42-44, 15 décembre 2009, I.D., précité, §§ 44-46, Oprea c. Moldova, no 38055/06, §§ 39-42, 21 décembre 2010, Rotaru c. Moldova, no 51216/06, §§ 33-42, 15 février 2011, Feraru c. Moldova, no 55792/08, §§ 41-46, 24 janvier 2012, Hadji c. Moldova, nos 32844/07 et 41378/07, §§ 19-20, 14 février 2012, Constantin Modarca c. République de Moldova, no 37829/08, §§ 25-27, 13 novembre 2012, Ciorap c. République de Moldova (no 3), no 32896/07, §§ 35-37, 4 décembre 2012, Mitrofan, précité, §§ 37-41, Ipati, précité, §§ 64-65 ; et Segheti, §§ 30-33).
• EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 12066/02

  CIORAP CONTRE LA RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET 26 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  32844/07+.
• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 72238/14

  COTEÈš v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  The Court recalls that it has found the conditions of detention in Prison no. 13 to be in breach of Article 3 of the Convention in a number of cases examined by it (see, amongst many other authorities, Hadji v. Moldova, nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012; Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015).

• EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 61050/11

  MESCEREACOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  In such circumstances, the Court considers that there are no reasons to depart from the conclusions reached in its previous judgments (see among recent authorities Hadji v. Moldova, nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012; Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015).
• EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 21061/11

  PISAROGLU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  In such circumstances, the Court considers that there are no reasons to depart from the conclusions reached in Hadji v. Moldova (nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012).
• EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 17963/08

  [ENG]

  In such circumstances, the Court considers that there are no reasons to depart from the conclusions reached in its previous judgments (see among recent authorities Hadji v. Moldova, nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012; Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015).
• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 20546/16

  SECRIERU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  The Court recalls that it has found the conditions of detention in Prison no. 13 to be contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in numerous judgments (see, amongst many other authorities, Hadji v. Moldova, nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012; Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015).
• EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 30921/10

  GOREMICHIN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  In so far as the conditions of detention in Prison no. 13 are concerned, the Court recalls that it has found them to be contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in numerous judgments (see, among recent authorities, Hadji v. Moldova, nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012; Silvestru v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 28173/10, 13 January 2015; Pisaroglu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 21061/11, 3 March 2015).
• EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 28173/10

  SILVESTRU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  The Court observes that in Hadji v. Moldova (nos. 32844/07 and 41378/07, § 20, 14 February 2012), it found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the poor conditions of the applicant's detention in Prison no. 13 between March 2007 and April 2008.
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 40614/14

  VALENTIN BASTOVOI c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  Dans ces conditions, la Cour ne voit aucune raison de s'éloigner des constats opérés dans ses jugements précédents à l'égard de cette prison (voir, entre autres, Hadji c. Moldova, nos 32844/07 et 41378/07, § 20, 14 février 2012, Silvestru c. République de Moldova, no 28173/10, § 21, 13 janvier 2015, et Pisaroglu c. République de Moldova, no 21061/11, § 18, 3 mars 2015).
• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 36740/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 74497/13

  MIRON v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA