Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MIHOV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 5-4 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.09.2000 - 35519/97
• EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 35519/97
• EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35519/97

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35519/97

  Where such grounds were "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 152 and 153, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

  JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35519/97

  Any system of mandatory detention on remand is per se incompatible with Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see the Letellier v. France judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, §§ 35-53; the Clooth v. Belgium judgment of 12 December 1991, Series A no. 225, § 44; the Muller v. France judgment of 17 March 1997, Reports 1997-II, §§ 35-45; the above cited Labita judgment, §§ 152 and 162-165; and Ječius v. Lithuania, [no. 34578/97, ECHR 2000-IX] §§ 93 and 94).
• EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 33977/96

  ILIJKOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35519/97

  All of them later submitted applications raising complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention (see, Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, 26 July 2001, and the cases of Hristov v. Bulgaria, no. 35436/97 and Al Akidi v. Bulgaria, no. 35825/97).

• EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86

  LETELLIER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35519/97

  Any system of mandatory detention on remand is per se incompatible with Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see the Letellier v. France judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, §§ 35-53; the Clooth v. Belgium judgment of 12 December 1991, Series A no. 225, § 44; the Muller v. France judgment of 17 March 1997, Reports 1997-II, §§ 35-45; the above cited Labita judgment, §§ 152 and 162-165; and Ječius v. Lithuania, [no. 34578/97, ECHR 2000-IX] §§ 93 and 94).
• EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 12718/87

  CLOOTH v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35519/97

  Any system of mandatory detention on remand is per se incompatible with Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see the Letellier v. France judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, §§ 35-53; the Clooth v. Belgium judgment of 12 December 1991, Series A no. 225, § 44; the Muller v. France judgment of 17 March 1997, Reports 1997-II, §§ 35-45; the above cited Labita judgment, §§ 152 and 162-165; and Ječius v. Lithuania, [no. 34578/97, ECHR 2000-IX] §§ 93 and 94).
• EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35436/97

  HRISTOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35519/97

  All of them later submitted applications raising complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention (see, Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, 26 July 2001, and the cases of Hristov v. Bulgaria, no. 35436/97 and Al Akidi v. Bulgaria, no. 35825/97).
• EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35825/97

  AL AKIDI v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35519/97

  All of them later submitted applications raising complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention (see, Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, 26 July 2001, and the cases of Hristov v. Bulgaria, no. 35436/97 and Al Akidi v. Bulgaria, no. 35825/97).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 50326/99

  KOLEV v. BULGARIA

  The Court, having regard to awards made in similar cases (see Mihov v. Bulgaria, no. 35519/97, 31 July 2003, and Ilijkov, cited above), considers that the applicant's claim is excessive.
• EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01

  BOCHEV v. BULGARIA

  The applicant's grievance about the lack of equality of arms in the proceedings before the Sofia Court of Appeal is the same as those in several cases against Bulgaria in which the Court found breaches of Article 5 § 4 (see Nikolova, cited above, §§ 54, 58, 62 and 63; Ilijkov, cited above, §§ 101-04; Mihov v. Bulgaria, no. 35519/97, §§ 99-104, 31 July 2003; Hristov, cited above, § 118; Kuibishev v. Bulgaria, no. 39271/98, § 76, 30 September 2004; E.M.K., cited above, § 132; and Kolev v. Bulgaria, no. 50326/99, § 79, 28 April 2005).
• EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 39271/98

  KUIBISHEV v. BULGARIA

  The Court observes that in the present case, as in previous Bulgarian cases (see, among others, Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, cited above, §§ 101-104 and Mihov v. Bulgaria, no. 35519/97, §§ 99-104, 31 July 2003), the parties to the proceedings before the Supreme Court of Cassation on 23 October 1997, 15 January 1998 and 11 March 1998 were not on equal footing.

• EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35436/97

  HRISTOV v. BULGARIA

  The applicant had acted in concert with three other persons all of whom later submitted applications raising complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention (see Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, 26 July 2001, and the cases of Mihov v. Bulgaria, no. 35519/97, and Al Akidi v. Bulgaria, no. 35825/97).
• EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 35825/97

  AL AKIDI v. BULGARIA

  The applicant had acted in concert with three other persons all of whom later submitted applications under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention (see Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, 26 July 2001, and the cases of Hristov v. Bulgaria, no. 35346/97, and Mihov v. Bulgaria, no. 35519/97).
• EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 35436/97

  HRISTOV v. BULGARIA

  The applicant had acted in concert with three other persons all of whom later submitted applications to the European Commission of Human Rights raising complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention (see Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, 26 July 2001, unreported, and the pending cases of Mihov v. Bulgaria, no. 35519/97, and Al Akidi v. Bulgaria, no. 35825/97).
• EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 35825/97

  AL AKIDI v. BULGARIA

  The applicant had acted in concert with three other persons all of whom later submitted applications to the European Commission of Human Rights raising complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention (see Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, 26 July 2001, unreported, and the pending cases of Hristov v. Bulgaria, no. 35346/97, and Mihov v. Bulgaria, no. 35519/97).
• EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 52389/99

  EMIL HRISTOV v. BULGARIA

  The Court, having regard to awards made in similar cases (see Mihov v. Bulgaria, no. 35519/97, §§ 106-108, 31 July 2003 and Ilijkov, cited above, §§ 120-124), on an equitable basis awards to the applicant the sum of EUR 500 for non-pecuniary damage.
• EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 41171/98

  ZAPRIANOV v. BULGARIA

  The Court, having regard to awards made in previous similar cases (see Mihov v. Bulgaria, no. 35519/97, 31 July 2003, Hristov v. Bulgaria, no. 35436/97, 31 July 2003, Al Akidi v. Bulgaria, no. 35825/97, 31 July 2003, Belchev v. Bulgaria, no. 39270/98, 8 April 2004 and, Hamanov v. Bulgaria, no. 44062/98, 8 April 2004) and deciding on an equitable basis, awards EUR 3, 500 under this head.