Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SABEUR BEN ALI v. MALTA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 5-4 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.07.1999 - 35892/97
• EGMR, 29.06.2000 - 35892/97

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Zitiert selbst (1)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• OLG Hamburg, 18.01.2010 - 13 W 28/09

  Grundbucheintragung bei Zuerwerb von Wohnungseigentum: Nachverpfändung von …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.06.2000 - 35892/97

  29/09/2000.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 55352/12

  Verstoß Maltas gegen Art. 3 EMRK

  The Court notes, however, that it has held on numerous occasions that constitutional proceedings in Malta are rather cumbersome for Article 5 § 4 purposes, and that lodging a constitutional application does not ensure a speedy review of the lawfulness of an applicant's detention (see Sabeur Ben Ali v. Malta, no. 35892/97, § 40, 29 June 2000; Kadem, cited above, § 53; Stephens v. Malta (no. 2), no. 33740/06, § 90, 21 April 2009; and Louled Massoud, cited above, § 45).
• EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 33977/96

  ILIJKOV v. BULGARIA

  cit.; Musial v. Poland, 24557/94, ECHR 1999-II; Sabeur Ben Ali v. Malta, no. 35892/97; and Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/98, § 67, ECHR 2000-X), and ruling on an equitable basis, the Court awards the global sum of BGN 6, 000 under the head of non-pecuniary damage in respect of the violations of the Convention found in the present case.
• EGMR, 20.09.2001 - 55263/00

  KADEM v. MALTA

  He refers, on this point, to the judgment given by the Court (Second Section) on 29 June 2000 in the case of Sabeur Ben Ali v. Malta (application no. 35892/97).

  The Court considers that the question of the exhaustion of domestic remedies is linked to the substance of the applicant's complaint under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see Sabeur Ben Ali v. Malta, application n° 35892/97, decision of the Court (Second Section) of 6 July 1999, unpublished).

• EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 38884/97

  NIKOLOV v. BULGARIA

  cit.; Musial v. Poland, 24557/94, ECHR 1999-II; Sabeur Ben Ali v. Malta, no. 35892/97; Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/98, § 67, ECHR 2000-X; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, cited above, and Filiz and Kalkan v. Turkey, no. 34481/97, 20 June 2002, unreported), and deciding on an equitable basis the Court awards 2, 000 euros ("EUR") in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42337/12

  SUSO MUSA v. MALTA

  However, the Court has also held on numerous occasions that constitutional proceedings in Malta are rather cumbersome for Article 5 § 4 purposes, and that lodging a constitutional application does not ensure a speedy review of the lawfulness of an applicant's detention (see Sabeur Ben Ali v. Malta, no. 35892/97, § 40, 29 June 2000; Kadem, cited above § 53; Stephens v. Malta (no. 2), no. 33740/06, § 90, 21 April 2009; and Louled Massoud, cited above, § 45).
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 4458/10

  MIKALAUSKAS v. MALTA

  Moreover, while it is clear that, unlike the above-mentioned remedies, such jurisdictions would be competent to look at the lawfulness of the applicant's detention in the light of Article 5 § 3, the Court notes that it has held on numerous occasions that constitutional proceedings in Malta are rather cumbersome for Article 5 § 4 purposes, and that lodging a constitutional application could not ensure a speedy review of the lawfulness of an applicant's detention (see Sabeur Ben Ali v. Malta, no. 35892/97, § 40, 29 June 2000; Kadem, cited above § 53; Stephens (No. 2), cited above, § 90; and Louled Massoud, cited above § 45).
• EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 55263/00

  KADEM v. MALTA

  The Court therefore finds that the Government have not shown that the applicant could have obtained a review of the lawfulness of his detention by relying on Article 137 of the Criminal Code (see Sabeur Ben Ali v. Malta, no. 35892/97, § 39, 29 June 2000, unreported).
• EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 20287/10

  SALIBA AND OTHERS v. MALTA

  The Court has already held that this is a cumbersome procedure, especially since practice shows that appeals to the Constitutional Court are lodged as a matter of course (see Sabeur Ben Ali v. Malta, no. 35892/97, § 40, 29 June 2000 and Kadem v. Malta, no. 55263/00, § 53, 9 January 2003, where the Court held that the relevant proceedings are invariably longer than what would qualify as "speedy" for Article 5 § 4 purposes).
• EGMR, 01.04.2008 - 73957/01

  VARGA c. ROUMANIE

  La Cour observe que, si elle a conclu à la violation de l'article 5 § 3 de la Convention dans des affaires dans lesquelles, à défaut d'un contrôle automatique, les requérants n'ont pas été présentés « aussitôt'devant un « magistrat ", au sens de l'article susmentionné (Aquilina et Niedbala, précités, et Sabeur Ben Ali c. Malte, no 35892/97, 29 juin 2000), elle n'a pas examiné une affaire dans laquelle, comme en l'espèce, alors que le système légal respectif ne prévoyait pas un contrôle automatique, la régularité et le bien-fondé du placement en détention provisoire ont été néanmoins examinés « aussitôt'par un « magistrat'habilité à exercer des fonctions judiciaires, sur demande des requérants.
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 46575/09

  [ENG]

  The Court has already held that this is a cumbersome procedure, especially since practice shows that appeals to the Constitutional Court are lodged as a matter of course (see Sabeur Ben Ali v. Malta, no. 35892/97, § 40, 29 June 2000 and Kadem v. Malta, no. 55263/00, § 53, 9 January 2003, where the Court held that the relevant proceedings are invariably longer than what would qualify as "speedy" for Article 5 § 4 purposes).