Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOLONSKIY AND PETROVA v. RUSSIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• KAG Freiburg, 19.06.2009 - 11/09

  Anspruch auf Freistellung und Kostenübernahme für eine beabsichtigte …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 3752/08

  On 11/09/2007 the bailiffs service informed the applicant, in particular, that if a debtor institution lacked funds, the owner of the property assigned to it was vicariously liable for the debt.
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 21965/10

  VLACHOS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 3752/08

  [1] See the decision by the Moscow Regional Court of 2 November 2010, in case no 33-21045, concerning a claim in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage against a recreational municipal institution and the Kolomna municipal authority, and the decision of 5 July 2011, in case no 33-10216, concerning a claim in respect of non-pecuniary damage and for a certain refund as regards an educational institution and the Klimovsk municipal authority See the ruling by the 10th Commercial Court of Appeal of 16 June 2011, in case no A41-8359/11, concerning the financial obligations (payment of arrears for certain services) of a municipal educational institution and the relevant authority, as well as the ruling of the same court of 25 April 2011, in case no A41-21965/10, concerning an electricity bill of a municipal institution and the relevant authority.
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 3752/08

  It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible, was one which was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see, mutatis mutandis, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V and Liseytseva and Maslov v. Russia, nos.

• KAG Mainz, 26.06.2012 - M 21/11

  Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 3752/08

  21/11/2007.
• KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 15/06

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 3752/08

  15/06/2006,.
• EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 39483/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 3752/08

  39483/05 and 40527/10, § 156, 9 October 2014).
• EGMR, 30.01.2018 - 77056/14

  SHTOLTS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 3752/08

  For a summary of the provisions of the new Law, see Shtolts and Others v. Russia (dec.) (nos. 77056/14 and 2 others, §§ 31-41, 30 January 2018).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 29.06.2021 - 26691/18

  BRODA c. POLOGNE et 1 autre affaire

  Or, selon la jurisprudence bien établie de la Cour, en cas de doute concernant l'effectivité d'une voie de recours, le requérant a l'obligation d'essayer de faire valoir ses droits (voir, par exemple, Lienhardt c. France (déc.), no 12139/10, 13 septembre 2011, Rhazali et autres c. France (déc.), no 37568/09, 10 avril 2012, Ignats c. Lettonie (déc.), no 38494/05, 24 septembre 2013, Vučković et autres c. Serbie [GC], no 17153/11 et 29 autres, 25 mars 2014, et Solonskiy et Petrova c. Russie (déc.), no 3752/08 et 22723/09, 17 mars 2020).
• EGMR, 09.11.2021 - 39011/11

  TEKHNOLOGII XXI VEKA v. RUSSIA

  3752/08 and 22723/09, §§ 17-18, 17 March 2020).

  3752/08 and 22723/09, §§ 34-40, 17 March 2020).

• EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 46472/19

  ÖZTiRAK c. TURQUIE

  3752/08 and 22723/09, § 33, 17 March 2020, with further references).