Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SAYGI v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Saygi v. Turkey

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SAYGI v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (8)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11

  To that end, the Court reiterates that the obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 161, Series A no. 324; Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, § 105, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I).
• EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 77617/01

  MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11

  However, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 107, 26 January 2006 and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 32457/04

  BRECKNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11

  To that end, the Court considered in its judgment in the case of Brecknell v. the United Kingdom (no. 32457/04, § 71, 27 November 2007) that, where there is a plausible, or credible, allegation, piece of evidence or item of information relevant to the identification, and eventual prosecution or punishment of the perpetrator of an unlawful killing, the authorities are under an obligation to take further investigative measures.

• EGMR, 24.04.2003 - 24351/94

  AKTAS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11

  Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of death or the person responsible will risk falling foul of this standard (see Aktas v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, § 300, ECHR 2003-V (extracts) and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 6492/11

  Luzenko ./. Ukraine

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11

  However, in so far as the applicant's claim can be understood as relating to non-pecuniary damage, it is to be noted that the Court has in a number of judgments entertained similar requests where the applicant left the determination of the amount to the Court's discretion (see, inter alia, Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 6492/11, §§ 112-114, 3 July 2012 and Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, §§ 165-167, 25 June 2013).
• EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 27872/03

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11

  Such an investigation may in some cases reasonably be restricted to verifying the credibility of the source or of the purported new evidence (ibid., § 71; see also Gasyak and Others v. Turkey, no. 27872/03, §§ 61-63, 13 October 2009).
• EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 33192/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11

  However, in so far as the applicant's claim can be understood as relating to non-pecuniary damage, it is to be noted that the Court has in a number of judgments entertained similar requests where the applicant left the determination of the amount to the Court's discretion (see, inter alia, Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 6492/11, §§ 112-114, 3 July 2012 and Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, §§ 165-167, 25 June 2013).
• EGMR, 26.02.2013 - 24589/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11

  Moreover, the Court has already accepted that the more time that goes by without any news of the person who has disappeared, the greater the likelihood that he or she has died (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, § 226, ECHR 2004-III; see also Bozkır and Others v. Turkey, no. 24589/04, § 58, 26 February 2013).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 12938/07

  CERF v. TURKEY

  In light of the foregoing, the Court considers that the information submitted to the authorities in January 2000 led to significant new developments and that therefore the procedural obligation to investigate the killing of the applicant's husband was revived after that date (see Gasyak and Others v. Turkey, no. 27872/03, §§ 60-63, 13 October 2009; see also Sayğı v. Turkey, no. 37715/11, § 50, 27 January 2015).
• EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 520/12

  BESTAS c. TURQUIE

  Toutefois, l'écoulement du temps peut inévitablement être un obstacle quant à la détermination de l'endroit où se trouve un témoin ou à l'évaluation de la fiabilité du témoignage relatif à l'incident en cause (Treskavica c. Croatie, no 32036/13, § 62, 12 janvier 2016, et Sayğı c. Turquie, no 37715/11, § 48, 27 janvier 2015).