Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17, 9167/18, 48372/18, 38097/19, 45985/19, 58880/19 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
K.F. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
K.F. AND A.F. v. NORWAY
Wird zitiert von ... Zitiert selbst (25)
- EGMR - 48372/18 (anhängig)
M.A. AND M.A. v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17
the decisions to give notice of the complaints concerning Article 8 of the Convention in all applications, of the complaint concerning Article 9 of the Convention in application no. 48372/18 and of the complaint concerning Article 6 of the Convention in application no. 38097/19 to the Norwegian Government ("the Government") represented by their Agent, Mr M. Emberland, of the Attorney General's Office (Civil Matters) and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application no. 45985/19;.39769/17, 9167/18 and 48372/18 by the Government of the Czech Republic, the Government of the Slovak Republic and the Ordo Iuris Institute for Legal Culture, who were granted leave to intervene by the President of the Section under Article 36 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 44 § 3 of the Rules of Court;.
In application no. 48372/18 the applicants additionally maintained that the replacement of foster care with adoption had violated their rights under Article 9 of the Convention.
Rn. 5 The Court considers that the complaint under Article 9 of the applicants in application no. 48372/18 is an integral part of their complaints under Article 8, interpreted and applied in the light of Article 9 (see, for a similar approach, Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway [GC], no. 15379/16, §§ 141-42, 10 December 2021).
Where both parents have applied to the Court (applications nos. 39769/17, 9167/18 and 48372/18), the award of that sum is made jointly (see the appended table).
39769/17, 48372/18, 38097/19 and 58880/19 did not submit any claims in respect of costs and expenses.
39769/17, 9167/18, 48372/18 and 45985/19, the respondent State is to pay to the applicant parents, within three months, the amount indicated in the appended table (jointly to the parent applicants where so indicated), plus any tax that may be chargeable in respect of non-pecuniary damage, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;.
48372/18.
- EGMR - 38097/19 (anhängig)
G.B. v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17
the decisions to give notice of the complaints concerning Article 8 of the Convention in all applications, of the complaint concerning Article 9 of the Convention in application no. 48372/18 and of the complaint concerning Article 6 of the Convention in application no. 38097/19 to the Norwegian Government ("the Government") represented by their Agent, Mr M. Emberland, of the Attorney General's Office (Civil Matters) and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application no. 45985/19;.Rn. 15 The applicant in application no. 38097/19 additionally complained of a violation of Article 6 of the Convention on grounds that one of the judges (an expert lay judge) who had participated in the impugned proceedings in 2018 regarding the removal of parental responsibilities and adoption had been biased, as that judge had also sat on the bench of the same court (City Court) in 2015 when that court had reviewed the care order made in respect of the applicant's son.
This part of application no. 38097/19 is thus manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4.
38097/19 and 58880/19 did not submit any claims in respect of damage.
39769/17, 48372/18, 38097/19 and 58880/19 did not submit any claims in respect of costs and expenses.
Declares the complaints under Article 8 of the Convention admissible and the remainder of application no. 38097/19 inadmissible;.
38097/19.
- EGMR - 45985/19 (anhängig)
G.G. v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17
the decision to grant legal aid to the applicant in application no. 45985/19;.the decisions to give notice of the complaints concerning Article 8 of the Convention in all applications, of the complaint concerning Article 9 of the Convention in application no. 48372/18 and of the complaint concerning Article 6 of the Convention in application no. 38097/19 to the Norwegian Government ("the Government") represented by their Agent, Mr M. Emberland, of the Attorney General's Office (Civil Matters) and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application no. 45985/19;.
9167/18 and 45985/19 claimed EUR 30, 378.30 and EUR 15, 000 respectively for costs and expenses.
Rn. 24 In respect of application no. 45985/19, the applicant did not submit any documents showing that she paid or was under a legal obligation to pay fees charged by her representative.
39769/17, 9167/18, 48372/18 and 45985/19, the respondent State is to pay to the applicant parents, within three months, the amount indicated in the appended table (jointly to the parent applicants where so indicated), plus any tax that may be chargeable in respect of non-pecuniary damage, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;.
45985/19.
- EGMR - 58880/19 (anhängig)
L.S. AND O.v. v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17
the observations submitted by the Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants in respect of all applications except application no. 58880/19;.the interest expressed by the applicant in pursuing application no. 58880/19;.
38097/19 and 58880/19 did not submit any claims in respect of damage.
39769/17, 48372/18, 38097/19 and 58880/19 did not submit any claims in respect of costs and expenses.
58880/19.
- BGH, 22.12.2011 - AK 22/11
Fortdauer der Untersuchungshaft über sechs Monate hinaus (dringender Tatverdacht; …
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17
On 23/11/17 the Supreme Court refused the applicant parents leave to appeal against the High Court's judgment. - KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 15/06
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17
The DC concurred with the Board's decision on 15/06/16, finding that the child was vulnerable and had a particular need for stability, and noted that the risk of future proceedings being instituted by the applicants might create uncertainty for X and her foster parents. - EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 15/02
DURUK ET YÜCEDAG c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17
On 15/02/19 the High Court refused the applicant and A leave to appeal against the DC judgment. - RG, 31.03.1903 - 28/03
Zur Bestimmung des Begriffs "Standesherr" in § 7 des zum …
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17
The Supreme Court's decision was served on the applicants on 28/03/18. - EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
Denisov v. Ukraine
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17
Rn. 16 The Court has examined the applicant's arguments in view of its relevant, well-established case-law on the requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal (see, for example, Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, §§ 60-65, 25 September 2018). - VerfGH Berlin, 20.12.2011 - VerfGH 28/11
Verfassungsbeschwerde: Verletzung des Anspruchs auf effektiven Rechtsschutz iSv …
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17
On 28/11/12 the DC upheld the Board's decision and the High Court refused the applicants leave to appeal on 25/02/13. On 29/11/13 the Board withdrew the applicants' contact rights, as the contact sessions had appeared to have a negative effect on X. The second applicant contested the Board's decision. - EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- VGH der UEK, 29.03.2005 - 29/01
- KAG Mainz, 11.12.2012 - M 29/12
Stufenzuordnung
- KAG Münster, 12.07.2010 - 28/09
Einführung einer Verteilung der Dienstzeiten auf 5,5 Tage-Woche; Verstoß gegen §§ …
- KAG Mainz, 12.01.2012 - M 28/11
"Einkehrtag" als beteiligungspflichtige Veranstaltung
- KAG Freiburg, 10.12.2010 - 10/09
Kostentragungspflicht der DCV als Dienstgeber für die durch die Teilnahme an …
- KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 18/06
- EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 64639/16
M.L. v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 10.03.2020 - 39710/15
PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 64808/16
K.O. AND v.M. v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 10.03.2020 - 14652/16
HERNEHULT v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 20.01.2022 - 45889/18
A.L. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 17.12.2019 - 60371/15
Polin gegen Norwegen: Recht auf Familienleben verletzt
- EGMR, 20.01.2022 - 53471/17
E.M. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 19.05.2022 - 21574/16
ROENGKASETTAKORN ERIKSSON v. SWEDEN
- EGMR, 30.01.2025 - 63625/19
MON c. FRANCE
Concernant les principes généraux applicables, il est en outre renvoyé aux développements de l'arrêt Strand Lobben et autres c. Norvège ([GC], no 37283/13, §§ 202-213, 10 septembre 2019, et pour l'application de ces principes dans des affaires similaires au regard du maintien des liens parents-enfants, voir les décisions de comité du 11 juillet 2023, A.G. c. Norvège, no 14301/19, A.H. c. Norvège, no 39771/19, A.N. c. Norvège, no 12825/20, F.K. c. Norvège, no 51860/19, H.L. c. Norvège, no 59747/19, I.M. c. Norvège, no 16998/20, J.B. et E.M. c. Norvège, no 277/20, M.A. et autres c. Norvège, no 41172/20, R.A. c. Norvège, no 44598/19, R.I. c. Norvège, no 7692/20, R.K. et autres c. Norvège, no 45413/20, T.H. c. Norvège, no 42796/20, et comparer les arrêts de comité du 12 septembre 2023, D.R. et autres c. Norvège, no 63307/17 et 38105/19, K.F. et autres c. Norvège, no 39769/17 et 5 autres, et S.S. et J.H. c. Norvège, no 15784/19).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 38097/19 |
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
G.B. v. NORWAY
Wird zitiert von ...
- EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 39769/17
K.F. AND A.F. v. NORWAY
the decisions to give notice of the complaints concerning Article 8 of the Convention in all applications, of the complaint concerning Article 9 of the Convention in application no. 48372/18 and of the complaint concerning Article 6 of the Convention in application no. 38097/19 to the Norwegian Government ("the Government") represented by their Agent, Mr M. Emberland, of the Attorney General's Office (Civil Matters) and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application no. 45985/19;.Rn. 15 The applicant in application no. 38097/19 additionally complained of a violation of Article 6 of the Convention on grounds that one of the judges (an expert lay judge) who had participated in the impugned proceedings in 2018 regarding the removal of parental responsibilities and adoption had been biased, as that judge had also sat on the bench of the same court (City Court) in 2015 when that court had reviewed the care order made in respect of the applicant's son.
This part of application no. 38097/19 is thus manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4.
38097/19 and 58880/19 did not submit any claims in respect of damage.
39769/17, 48372/18, 38097/19 and 58880/19 did not submit any claims in respect of costs and expenses.
Declares the complaints under Article 8 of the Convention admissible and the remainder of application no. 38097/19 inadmissible;.
38097/19.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".