Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 14.03.2019

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,46490
EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,46490)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29.11.2007 - 25/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,46490)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29. November 2007 - 25/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,46490)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,46490) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Art. 3, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly ...

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (245)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

  • EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

    MARCKX v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
    The Court recalls in the first place that according to the Convention organs' constant approach, the word "victim" of a breach of rights or freedoms denotes the person directly affected by the act or omission which is in issue (see Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, § 27; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, § 41).
  • EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76

    DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
    The Court recalls in the first place that according to the Convention organs' constant approach, the word "victim" of a breach of rights or freedoms denotes the person directly affected by the act or omission which is in issue (see Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, § 27; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, § 41).
  • EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82

    Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
    Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society, the Court refers in the first place to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III; Piermont v. France, judgment of 27 April 1995, Series A no. 314, §§ 76-77; and Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139, p. 12, § 32).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
    Such proof may, however, follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
    However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1995 - 15773/89

    PIERMONT c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
    Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society, the Court refers in the first place to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III; Piermont v. France, judgment of 27 April 1995, Series A no. 314, §§ 76-77; and Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139, p. 12, § 32).
  • EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

    RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
    Further, where allegations are made under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32).
  • EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

    REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
    As a result, in the particular circumstances of the present case, it cannot be said that the security forces were called upon to react without prior preparation (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 29900/96

    SADAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (No. 1)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
    Having regard to the facts of the case and the submissions of the parties, the Court concludes that there is no need to give a separate ruling on these complaints (see Uzun v. Turkey, no. 37410/97, § 64, 10 May 2007; Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 73, ECHR 2001-VIII).
  • EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 74552/01

    OYA ATAMAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
    It is clear from this case-law that the authorities have a duty to take appropriate measures with regard to lawful demonstrations in order to ensure their peaceful conduct and the safety of all citizens (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 35, ECHR 2006-....).
  • EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

    DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 37410/97

    KAMIL UZUN c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR - 50374/21 (anhängig)

    BELOMESTNOV v. RUSSIA and 34 other applications

    25/02/2022.

    5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

    25/02/2022.

    5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention from 9 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 10 a.m. on 26/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

    25/02/2022.

    5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention from 7.45 p.m. o 25/02/2022 to 1.10 a.m. on 26/02/2022.

    5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 7.10 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 1 a.m. 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

    25/02/2022.

    5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention from 8.20 p.m. om 25/02/2022 to 6.32 a.m. on 26/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

    25/02/2022.

  • EGMR - 41895/22 (anhängig)

    ANASHKIN v. RUSSIA and 12 other applications

    5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 8.55 p.m. on 24/02/2022 p.m. to the evening of 25/02/2022, until court hearing, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,.

    5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 11.33 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 3.55 p.m. on 25/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,.

    5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7.55 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 12 p.m. on 25/02/2022, until court hearing, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,.

    25/02/2022.

    5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 8.50 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 3.30 a.m. on 26/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,.

    25/02/2022.

    5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 10 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 6.50 a.m. on 26/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,.

    25/02/2022.

    5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 10 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 5.30 a.m. on 26/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,.

    25/02/2022.

    5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on from 8.50 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 3.05 a.m. on 26/02/2022, in excess of 3 hours, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,.

  • EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 62864/09

    MECIAR AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

    25/02/1997 - 01/12/2003.

    25/02/1997 - 30/09/2004.

    25/02/1997 - 07/11/2012.

    25/02/1997 - 07/11/2012.

    25/02/1997 - 07/11/2012.

    25/02/1997 - 29/02/2012.

    25/02/1997 - 07/03/2011.

    25/02/1997 - 02/07/2012.

    (25/02/1997 - 12/04/2004).

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 14.03.2019 - 42899/11, 31451/03, 65126/09, 19620/12, 28495/06, 33245/05, 32124/02, 16408/10, 9829/07, 26730/05, 17561/04, 26656/04, 6758/05, 25/02, 30357/05, 26235/04, 36487/07, 17843/11, 38676/08, 34027/03, 44920/04, 29835/05, 17526/10, 29612/05, 12903/02, 8029/07, 4   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2019,5699
EGMR, 14.03.2019 - 42899/11, 31451/03, 65126/09, 19620/12, 28495/06, 33245/05, 32124/02, 16408/10, 9829/07, 26730/05, 17561/04, 26656/04, 6758/05, 25/02, 30357/05, 26235/04, 36487/07, 17843/11, 38676/08, 34027/03, 44920/04, 29835/05, 17526/10, 29612/05, 12903/02, 8029/07, 4 (https://dejure.org/2019,5699)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14.03.2019 - 42899/11, 31451/03, 65126/09, 19620/12, 28495/06, 33245/05, 32124/02, 16408/10, 9829/07, 26730/05, 17561/04, 26656/04, 6758/05, 25/02, 30357/05, 26235/04, 36487/07, 17843/11, 38676/08, 34027/03, 44920/04, 29835/05, 17526/10, 29612/05, 12903/02, 8029/07, 4 (https://dejure.org/2019,5699)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14. März 2019 - 42899/11, 31451/03, 65126/09, 19620/12, 28495/06, 33245/05, 32124/02, 16408/10, 9829/07, 26730/05, 17561/04, 26656/04, 6758/05, 25/02, 30357/05, 26235/04, 36487/07, 17843/11, 38676/08, 34027/03, 44920/04, 29835/05, 17526/10, 29612/05, 12903/02, 8029/07, 4 (https://dejure.org/2019,5699)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,5699) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN CONTRE LA TURQUIE ET 54 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN AGAINST TURKEY AND 54 OTHER CASES

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

  • EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 42899/11
  • EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 42899/11
  • EGMR, 14.03.2019 - 42899/11, 31451/03, 65126/09, 19620/12, 28495/06, 33245/05, 32124/02, 16408/10, 9829/07, 26730/05, 17561/04, 26656/04, 6758/05, 25/02, 30357/05, 26235/04, 36487/07, 17843/11, 38676/08, 34027/03, 44920/04, 29835/05, 17526/10, 29612/05, 12903/02, 8029/07, 4
 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (6)

  • EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 20502/05

    UMAR KARATEPE c. TURQUIE

    En effet, la Cour constate que les autorités nationales n'ont pas indiqué les circonstances exactes dans lesquelles le requérant a reçu des coups et ne donnent aucun élément factuel précis pour vérifier la proportionnalité de la force utilisée par les policiers contre le requérant (Ahmet Akman c. Turquie, no 33245/05, § 41, 13 octobre 2009).

    La Cour a constaté que les autorités nationales n'avaient pas indiqué les circonstances exactes dans lesquelles le requérant avait reçu des coups ni donné aucun élément factuel précis pour vérifier la proportionnalité de la force utilisée par les policiers contre le requérant (Ahmet Akman c. Turquie, no 33245/05, § 41, 13 octobre 2009).

  • EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 12503/06

    TIMTIK c. TURQUIE

    Elle constate que les autorités nationales n'ont pas indiqué les circonstances exactes dans lesquelles la requérante a reçu des coups et qu'elles n'ont donné aucun élément factuel précis permettant de vérifier la proportionnalité de la force utilisée par les policiers contre l'intéressée (Ahmet Akman c. Turquie, no 33245/05, § 41, 13 octobre 2009).
  • EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 74521/12

    YIGIT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Ces éléments sapant l'effectivité de l'enquête empêchent aussi de parvenir à une conclusion sur la question de savoir quand et comment les blessures des requérants ont pu se produire (voir, par exemple, pour un examen sur la nécessité et la proportionnalité du recours à la force, Ahmet Akman c. Turquie, no 33245/05, §§ 41-42, 13 octobre 2009).
  • EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 53100/11

    SARAÇ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Ainsi, l'argument du Gouvernement selon lequel les policiers se sont contentés de porter les requérants n'explique qu'insuffisamment la présence de ces multiples marques et lésions (voir, par exemple, pour un examen sur la nécessité et la proportionnalité du recours à la force, Ahmet Akman c. Turquie, no 33245/05, §§ 41-42, 13 octobre 2009).
  • EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 31714/10

    ISIK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Or ces éléments sapant l'effectivité de l'enquête empêchent aussi de parvenir à une conclusion sur la question de savoir quand et comment les blessures des requérants ont pu se produire (voir, par exemple, pour un examen sur la nécessité et la proportionnalité du recours à la force, Ahmet Akman c. Turquie, no 33245/05, §§ 41-42, 13 octobre 2009).
  • EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 6591/06

    GÜVEN c. TURQUIE

    Pour les principes pertinents en la matière, elle renvoie aux arrêts Ahmet Akman c. Turquie (no 33245/05, 13 octobre 2009), Mehmet Fidan c. Turquie (no 64969/10, §§ 40-41, 16 décembre 2014), et Sükrü Yildiz c. Turquie (no 4100/10, §§ 53, 56 et 59, 17 mars 2015).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht