Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  J.S. AND A.S. v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 6-1 inapplicable) Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 40732/98
• EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 40732/98

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 40732/98

  Given its jurisdiction ratione temporis, the Court can only consider the period which has elapsed since 1 May 1993, although it will have regard to the stage reached in the proceedings on that date (see, among other authorities, Zwierzynski v. Poland, no. 30210/96, § 123, ECHR 2000-XI).

• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

  BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)

  En même temps, dans plusieurs affaires la Cour a déclaré l'article 6 applicable à d'autres recours extraordinaires prévus dans certains États (voir notamment les arrêts Melis c. Grèce, no 30604/07, § 19, 22 juillet 2010 ; San Leonard Band Club c. Malte, no 77562/01, CEDH 2004-IX ; Maresti c. Croatie, no 55759/07, 25 juin 2009, et J.S. et A.S. c. Pologne, no 40732/98, 24 mai 2005).
• EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 38016/07

  SIERPINSKI v. POLAND

  The Court reiterates that there is no necessary interrelation between the existence of claims covered by the notion of "possessions" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and the applicability of Article 6 § 1 (see Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII; Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 52, ECHR 2004-IX; J.S. and A.S. v. Poland, no. 40732/98, § 51, 24 May 2005).
• EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 37169/03

  WEISS v. SLOVENIA

  Since the latter concern the restitution of property, the proceedings as a whole concern the determination of the applicant's "civil rights" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see J.S. and A.S. v. Poland, no. 40732/98, §§ 49-54, 24 May 2005; and Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR-XII).