Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  M.D. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-general;(Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Violation of Article 2+3 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion;Article 2-1 - Life) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  M.D. v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (14)Zitiert selbst (20)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 16868/19 (anhängig)

  M.A. v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

  The cases of K.A., Z.A., O.S., M.A., R.K., A.A. and A.K.A. (applications nos. 58858/18, 60000/18, 60001/18, 16868/19, 41174/19, 41176/19 and 41179/19).

  (i) The cases of K.A., Z.A., O.S., and M.A. (applications nos. 58858/18, 60000/18, 60001/18 and 16868/19).

  (b) The cases of K.A., Z.A., O.S., M.A., R.K., A.A. and A.K.A. (applications nos. 58858/18, 60000/18, 60001/18, 16868/19, 41174/19, 41176/19 and 41179/19).

  (b) The cases of K.A., Z.A., O.S., M.A., R.K., A.A. and A.K.A. (applications nos. 58858/18, 60000/18, 60001/18, 16868/19, 41174/19, 41176/19, and 41179/19).

  16868/19.

• EGMR - 41174/19 (anhängig)

  R.K. v. RUSSIA and 2 other applicaitons

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

  The cases of K.A., Z.A., O.S., M.A., R.K., A.A. and A.K.A. (applications nos. 58858/18, 60000/18, 60001/18, 16868/19, 41174/19, 41176/19 and 41179/19).

  (ii) The case of R.K. (application no. 41174/19).

  (b) The cases of K.A., Z.A., O.S., M.A., R.K., A.A. and A.K.A. (applications nos. 58858/18, 60000/18, 60001/18, 16868/19, 41174/19, 41176/19 and 41179/19).

  (b) The cases of K.A., Z.A., O.S., M.A., R.K., A.A. and A.K.A. (applications nos. 58858/18, 60000/18, 60001/18, 16868/19, 41174/19, 41176/19, and 41179/19).

  41174/19.

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  KIM v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

  A summary of domestic law provisions concerning the detention of foreign nationals pending expulsion is contained in the judgments in the cases of Kim v. Russia (no. 44260/13, §§ 41-57 and 68-74, 17 July 2014), and Azimov v. Russia (no. 67474/11, §§ 75-81 and 83, 18 April 2013).

  Execution proceedings relating to the judgment in the case of Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, 17 July 2014.

• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 40081/14

  Russland verurteilt - Keine Zwangsausweisung nach Syrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

  The relevant domestic law and practice relating to the expulsion and detention of foreign nationals in Russia, refugee status and temporary asylum is summarised in the Court's judgment concerning expulsion of Syrian nationals from Russia in the case of L.M. and Others v. Russia (nos. 40081/14 and two others, §§ 61-75, 15 October 2015) and in the follow-up case of S.K. v. Russia, no. 52722/15, §§ 23-41, 14 February 2017.

  It has found that while ruling on the question of the possibility of removal, the scope of review by the domestic authorities, including the courts, should include relevant arguments regarding ill-treatment raised by the applicants, in view of the absolute nature of Article 3 of the Convention (see L.M. and Others v. Russia, nos. 40081/14 and 2 others, §§ 100-02, 15 October 2015).

• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15

  Asyl: Russland darf Syrer nicht abschieben

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

  The relevant domestic law and practice relating to the expulsion and detention of foreign nationals in Russia, refugee status and temporary asylum is summarised in the Court's judgment concerning expulsion of Syrian nationals from Russia in the case of L.M. and Others v. Russia (nos. 40081/14 and two others, §§ 61-75, 15 October 2015) and in the follow-up case of S.K. v. Russia, no. 52722/15, §§ 23-41, 14 February 2017.

  Accordingly, in the light of these considerations, and given the Court's recurrent findings of violations of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention in respect of foreigners detained virtually indefinitely in Russia with a view to administrative expulsion, the Court finds that the length of the detention of M.D. and M.O. exceeded what was reasonably required for the purpose pursued (see the above-cited cases of L.M. and Others v. Russia, §§ 141-42 and 149-52, with further references, and S.K. v. Russia, no. 52722/15, §§ 108-09 and § 116, 14 February 2017; see also M.S.A. and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 29957/14 and 9 others, 12 December 2017, in which the Court found that the detention of Syrian nationals pending expulsion was in violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention).

• EGMR, 10.10.2019 - 34016/18

  O.D. ./. Bulgarien - Abschiebung nach Syrien würde gegen Folterverbot verstoßen

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

  A review of international reports covering the period 2017-2019 concerning the security and humanitarian situation in Syria was carried out by the Court in the case of O.D. v. Bulgaria (no. 34016/18, § 23, 10 October 2019).

  The Court notes that all those reports are consistent with its findings in respect of the general security situation over the whole of Syria in the recent case of O.D. v. Bulgaria (no. 34016/18, §§ 53-54, 10 October 2019).

• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

  In such circumstances, the Court considers that the applicants' complaint about the length of judicial review falls outside the scope of its examination in the present case (ibid.; and Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 109, 20 March 2018).
• EGMR, 17.11.2016 - 60125/11

  V.M. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

  Such contact is essential, both in order to learn more about the applicant's particular situation and to confirm the applicant's continuing interest in pursuing the examination of his or her application (see V.M. and Others v. Belgium [GC], no. 60125/11, § 35, 17 November 2016).
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 46390/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

  This approach cannot be considered compatible with the need for independent and rigorous scrutiny that is required in cases concerning expulsion (see Chahal v. the United Kingdom, no. 22414/93, § 80, 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, and Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140/10, § 118, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), where the Court held that the activities of the individual in question, however undesirable or dangerous, cannot be a material consideration when substantial grounds have been shown for believing that that individual would face a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention if removed to another State; see also Auad v. Bulgaria, no. 46390/10, § 101, 11 October 2011).
• EGMR, 23.10.2014 - 17239/13

  MAMAZHONOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 71321/17

  However it is the Court's settled case-law that expulsion or extradition by a Contracting State may give rise to an issue under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention) where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the individual concerned, if deported, faces a real risk of being killed or subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (see Headley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39642/03, 1 March 2005 (with further references), and Mamazhonov v. Russia, no. 17239/13, §§ 127-28, 23 October 2014).
• EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 67474/11

  AZIMOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 45875/06

  RAFIG ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 10.07.2014 - 50552/13

  RAKHIMOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 59727/13

  AHMED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• RG, 31.03.1903 - 28/03

  Zur Bestimmung des Begriffs "Standesherr" in § 7 des zum …
• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 29957/14

  SHEYKH ALI v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 30261/17

  R.K. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 11673/15

  RAKHMONOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 39642/03

  HEADLEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EuGH, 13.07.1961 - 27/60

  Anforderungen an das Vorliegen eines von der Hohen Behörde zu vertretenden …

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 41174/19 (anhängig)

  R.K. v. RUSSIA and 2 other applicaitons

  41176/19 and 41179/19 complain that their detention pending expulsion has been in breach of Article 5 § 1 (f) of the Convention.

  41176/19 and 41179/19.

  41176/19.

  41179/19.

• EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 1557/19

  AKKAD v. TURKEY

  Un résumé des informations pertinentes sur la situation en Syrie et celle des réfugiés syriens au cours de la période 2017-2019 peut être consulté dans l'arrêt M.D. et autres c. Russie (nos 71321/17 et 8 autres, §§ 34-37, 14 septembre 2021).

  En effet, les informations publiées à cette époque par les organes des Nations unies, qui couvraient aussi le moment où le requérant a été refoulé, révélaient clairement que le retour forcé des Syriens dans leur pays n'était pas recommandé en raison de la poursuite des hostilités, ainsi que des violences et des détentions arbitraires dont les civils étaient victimes (voir, dans le même sens, M.D. et autres c. Russie, nos 71321/17 et 8 autres, § 95, 14 septembre 2021, et les références citées dans cet arrêt aux constats des organes des Nations Unies).

• EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 31147/20

  GASHKOV v. RUSSIA

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see L.M. and Others v. Russia, nos. 40081/14 and 2 others, §§ 149-52, 15 October 2015, and M.D. and Others v. Russia, nos. 71321/17 and 8 others, §§ 124-27, 14 September 2021, concerning detention pending expulsion ordered under the CAO, that exceeded the duration reasonably required for the purpose pursued).

  71321/17 and 8 others, §§ 124-27, 14 September 2021).

• EGMR, 12.11.2024 - 56390/21

  M.I. c. SUISSE

  Rn. 44 The Court has held that, in the context of applications for asylum based on a known general risk, where information on that risk is freely available from a wide range of sources, it is for the authorities, in order to comply with the obligation under Article 3 of the Convention, to carry out an assessment of that risk of their own motion (see F.G. v. Sweden, cited above, § 126, and the references cited therein, and M.D. and Others v. Russia, nos. 71321/17 and 8 others, § 97, 14 September 2021).
• EGMR, 14.01.2025 - 60811/15

  KUNSHUGAROV v. TURKEY and 1 other application

  Rn. 161 The Court further reiterates that the fact that expulsion proceedings have been provisionally suspended as a result of the application of an interim measure does not in itself render the detention of the person concerned unlawful, (i) provided that the authorities still envisage expulsion at a later stage (so that "action is being taken" - even though the proceedings are suspended), and (ii) on condition that the detention will not be unreasonably prolonged (see M.D. and Others v. Russia, nos. 71321/17 and 8 others, § 125, 14 September 2021, with further references).
• EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 19124/21

  MATTHEWS v. ROMANIA and 2 other applications

  71321/17 and 8 others, § 125, 14 September 2021).
• EGMR, 06.02.2024 - 80206/17

  AWAD v. TURKEY

  Within the context of expulsion - where there are substantial grounds to believe that the person in question, if expelled, would face a real risk of capital punishment, torture, or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in the destination country - both Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention imply that the Contracting State must not expel that person (M.D. and Others v. Russia, nos. 71321/17 and 8 others, § 89, 14 September 2021).
• VG Köln, 12.01.2023 - 20 K 6400/20
  Rn. 82 vgl. EGMR, Urteile vom 14.09.2021 - Nr. 71321/17 u.a. - M.D. and others v. Russia, vom 19.10.2019 - Nr. 34016/18 - O.D. v. Bulgaria - und vom 14.02.2017 - Nr. 52722/15 - S.K vs. Russland -,.
• EGMR, 19.03.2024 - 27584/20

  K.J. AND C.C. v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications

  71321/17 and 8 others, § 56, 14 September 2021).
• VG Köln, 29.12.2022 - 20 K 5666/21
  Rn. 82 vgl. EGMR, Urteile vom 14.09.2021 - Nr. 71321/17 u.a. - M.D. and others v. Russia, vom 19.10.2019 - Nr. 34016/18 - O.D. v. Bulgaria - und vom 14.02.2017 - Nr. 52722/15 - S.K vs. Russland -,.
• EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 13927/21

  DALABAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 59387/18

  RASULOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.05.2023 - 21971/21

  KAMAL c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 12120/20

  A.J. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA