Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 4171/04 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GRIDIN v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...
Wird zitiert von ... (42) Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 13.01.2005 - 5124/03
GIZZATOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 4171/04
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, § 35 et seq., 18 November 2004; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III). - EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 15021/02
WASSERMAN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 4171/04
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, § 35 et seq., 18 November 2004; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III).
- EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 58263/00
TIMOFEYEV AND 234 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
4171/04.4171/04.
- EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 31535/09
GORBULYA v. RUSSIA
The Court reiterates, firstly, that the applicant cannot be required to furnish any proof of the non-pecuniary damage he has sustained (see Gridin v. Russia, no. 4171/04, § 20, 1 June 2006). - EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 20075/03
SHILBERGS v. RUSSIA
The Court reiterates, firstly, that the applicant cannot be required to furnish any proof of the non-pecuniary damage he sustained (see Gridin v. Russia, no. 4171/04, § 20, 1 June 2006).
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 14146/02
[ENG]
The Court reiterates, firstly, that the applicant cannot be required to furnish any proof of the non-pecuniary damage he sustained (see Gridin v. Russia, no. 4171/04, § 20, 1 June 2006). - EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 41833/04
YEVGENIY ALEKSEYENKO v. RUSSIA
As to the non-pecuniary damage claim, the Court reiterates, firstly, that the applicant cannot be required to furnish any proof of the non-pecuniary damage he sustained (see Gridin v. Russia, no. 4171/04, § 20, 1 June 2006). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 33468/03
Verletzung der Unschuldsvermutung eines Verstorbenen durch gerichtliche …
55. As to non-pecuniary damage, the Court reiterates its constant position that an applicant cannot be required to furnish any proof of non-pecuniary damage he or she has sustained (see, among many others, Antipenkov v. Russia, no. 33470/03, § 82, 15 October 2009; Pshenichnyy v. Russia, no. 30422/03, § 35, 14 February 2008; Garabayev v. Russia, no. 38411/02, § 113, ECHR 2007"VII (extracts); and Gridin v. Russia, no. 4171/04, § 20, 1 June 2006). - EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 44973/04
PREMININY v. RUSSIA
The Court reiterates, firstly, that the first applicant cannot be required to furnish any proof of the non-pecuniary damage he sustained (see Gridin v. Russia, no. 4171/04, § 20, 1 June 2006). - EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 28957/02
PSHEVECHERSKIY v. RUSSIA
The Court reiterates, firstly, that an applicant cannot be required to exhaust domestic remedies to obtain compensation for his loss since this would prolong the procedure before the Court in a manner incompatible with the effective protection of human rights (see Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), judgment of 31 October 1995, Series A no. 330-B, § 40, and Gridin v. Russia, no. 4171/04, § 20, 1 June 2006). - EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 2974/05
VASYUKOV v. RUSSIA
The Court reiterates, firstly, that the applicant cannot be required to furnish any proof of the non-pecuniary damage he sustained (see Gridin v. Russia, no. 4171/04, § 20, 1 June 2006). - EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 24271/03
GEORGIY BYKOV v. RUSSIA
As regards the applicant's claims in respect of non-pecuniary damage, the Court reiterates, firstly, that the applicant cannot be required to furnish any proof of the non-pecuniary damage he sustained (see Gridin v. Russia, no. 4171/04, § 20, 1 June 2006). - EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 38411/02
GARABAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 16262/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 33470/03
ANTIPENKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 2807/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 36220/02
BARABANSHCHIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 36911/02
MISHKETKUL AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 49072/11
GORELOV (II) v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11
BUDANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 1900/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 07.05.2014 - 61510/09
[ENG]
- EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 17828/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 16264/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 13462/06
[ENG]
- EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 18541/04
KUZMENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 1748/02
BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 17472/04
BODROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 746/05
NINA KAZMINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 42255/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 38719/03
GLUSHAKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 38720/03
ALEKSANDR POPOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 42119/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 54872/08
[ENG]
- EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 16903/03
DENISOVA AND MOISEYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 11167/12
BAKANOVA v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 15578/03
YURIY LOBANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 34428/04
PORTNOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 36398/04
BAYGAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 14296/03
TIKHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 30422/03
PSHENICHNYY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 21268/04
KHARITICH v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 3906/06
SIVOLDAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 8564/02
STANISLAV VOLKOV v. RUSSIA
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".